• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

What's this "our" bullcrap? Your deity is not my deity.I am not bound one iota by your religious beliefs. I am bound by my own. If your deity has a problem with me,he knows where to find me.As It stands I am healthy,have a great wife,wonderful kids,beautiful grandchildren,a successful career,great friends,and plenty of wealth. I believe that I am,what you might called,blessed. And I am thankful for it. I don't need to thank you or your "Lord" for that.

Yeh...you gave that impression.

Let's hope you don't become poor, divorced and unhappy for mocking the Lord.
 
Go read the bible and get back to me on what it says. I can tell you that there is only one way to read it.

That is an incredibly ironic and untenable position...especially when you consider that there are what? Some eighteen different translations of the Bible for the Modern English language, alone? Bible Versions and Types - Word for Word (Literal), Thought for Thought, and Paraphrase

And this is not even close to coming to the innumberable amount of Biblical translations for the other languages.
 
The Supreme Court interpreted the constitution. This was already in the constitution. No vote required, unless you want to vote to amend the constitution. Good luck!

5 lawyers just changes the definition of marriage. you can dodge that obvious fact all you want. It happened. That does not mean it is right, it's just what happened. and the liberals vote in a sheep-like block on all this issues anyway. \
they ignored the words in the constitution in the Obamacare ruling, yet today they are defend it, is that your warped theory?
 
Oh you mean exactly the same thing they did today, then? Exactly the sort of thing I'm talking about?

It doesn't matter if you're talking about Dred Scott, Roe, or this newest abomination.


Maintaining the integrity of the Constitution is their job. When they not only fail to do that, but they directly violate the Constitution themselves and make up new "rights" willy nilly and force them against the states appropriate of nothing, that is tyranny.

When the foxes rule the henhouse, it's game over.

Except that this ruling did not make up any new rights. Marriage has been considered a right by the courts for decades in, I believe it was, 3 other separate court decisions. Loving v Virginia being one of them.
 
Your magic book has no authority over the United States or any of it's citizens. It shouldn't therefore be used to enact laws.

God rules, not ungodly men.

"Supreme Court Justices, can you judge the ways of God? Can you, with manmade verdicts, overrule the eternal laws of God? There is another court, and there is another Judge. And before Him, all men and all judges will give account. If a nation's high court should pass judgment on the Almighty, should you then be surprised if the Almighty should pass judgment on that court and that nation?"

Rabbi Jonathan Cahn Gives America a Final Warning - Freedom Outpost
 
That would be some bitter wine I bet!

It'd be for cooking and marinating, not actually drinking. There's enough whine going around for that reason. I like puns. Did I mention I liked puns? :lol:
 
5 lawyers just changes the definition of marriage. you can dodge that obvious fact all you want. It happened. That does not mean it is right, it's just what happened. and the liberals vote in a sheep-like block on all this issues anyway. \
they ignored the words in the constitution in the Obamacare ruling, yet today they are defend it, is that your warped theory?

5 lawyers interpreted that marriage cannot discriminate, the same that they did for interracial marriage. Nothing new.
 
I'm in agreement with God that gay marriage is bad. ISIS is apparently in agreement with Muhammad / Allah, who isn't God.

Got it?

Why would god create people with the ability to piss him off so badly he punishes them for eternity. Yea, sounds like love to me. :roll:
 
And you know what an alleged being from an alleged different universe is doing right now how? Sorry,WHC,you can keep your fairy tales and your boogeyman to yourself. Your beliefs are inconsequential to me. If all you have are scare tactics,you might as well give up right now. I don't scare easily.

Not trying to scare only notify.
 
shouldn't we put that up to vote? isn't this a democracy? or do you only give a crap about that when it's NOT in your favor?

Democracy is the masses oppressing the minority. If we put civil liberties up to democratic vote, minorities like myself, minorities like Hatuey, and minorities here on the forum that are in the LGBTQ community would never have the basic freedoms and ability to join the commonwealth.
 
shouldn't we put that up to vote? isn't this a democracy? or do you only give a crap about that when it's NOT in your favor?

Actually we live in a republic. Democracy was considered mob rule by the founding fathers. And rightfully so. If we were purely a democracy then all of our rights could quite easily be voted out by simple majority vote.
 
5 lawyers just changes the definition of marriage. you can dodge that obvious fact all you want. It happened. That does not mean it is right, it's just what happened. and the liberals vote in a sheep-like block on all this issues anyway. \
they ignored the words in the constitution in the Obamacare ruling, yet today they are defend it, is that your warped theory?

Unless you want to bring back the notion of the wife as property to be exchanged for a dowry, you should recognize that the "definition of marriage" changed a long time ago.
 
I probably wouldn't WANT to fight it if I thought this would be the end of it and the gay groups would now just go live their lives and stop calling me names. but it won't happen. a year from now we will STILL be arguing about how unfair the rest of the country is toward gay people for one reason or another. you watch. it will NEVER end.

Yep that chip won't be easily knocked off their shoulders.
 
it's not just this issue
if you don't agree with the liberal agenda you are not only wrong, you are evil. that is their mindset. it also happens to be the mindset of a small child.

We're just following the example set by the christian god.
 
Except that this ruling did not make up any new rights. Marriage has been considered a right by the courts for decades in, I believe it was, 3 other separate court decisions. Loving v Virginia being one of them.

Correct, but the regulation of that right was left to the states, and the states alone.

Tim-
 
Except that this ruling did not make up any new rights. Marriage has been considered a right by the courts for decades in, I believe it was, 3 other separate court decisions. Loving v Virginia being one of them.

Fourteen Supreme Court Cases (15 when you count today's decision) have previously ruled Marriage to be a fundamental right.
 
Thank the Aliens!!!!! Republicans will be more legally and socially undermined thanks to this Supreme Court ruling than any other ruling or law in the history of the country!!!

The illogical Conservative darkness is finally leaving the land! Progression is at hand.
 
It's becoming more and more obvious that some Conservatives aren't really against gay marriage because they believe it should be up to the states... they're against it because of their religion. They're using the legal arguments as a front. Even some people who pretended for so long to be against it based on some legal premise have given up all pretense and just admitted that they're against it because they're fundies through their own actions in this forum. Oh... the sweet deliciousness of politics. :lol:
 
Democracy is the masses oppressing the minority. If we put civil liberties up to democratic vote, minorities like myself, minorities like Hatuey, and minorities here on the forum that are in the LGBTQ community would never have the basic freedoms and ability to join the commonwealth.

BULL DOOKY y'all keep asking for things you don't deserve the the activist SCOTUS keep giving them to you.
 
Back
Top Bottom