• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

SCOTUS got it wrong?
 
SCOTUS got it wrong?

SCOTUS legalized incest marriage in 1967. In a court ruling addressing a controversy related to heterosexual marriage. According to you and your strict adherence to words used in a decision made.
 
No, they literally did not.

Sure, they did.

And if not there then the original definition of "between one man and one woman" allows incest between opposite sex family members.

You must have been confused. :cool:
 
SCOTUS disagrees with your claim that Loving refers to incest.
 
No, they don't. According to you because the Loving ruling does not specifically rule out incest it legalized it.

Are you feeling the futility of existence yet?
 
You think Loving legalizes incest marriage?

I don't. You do. You made that clear early in the thread when you insisted that the recent ruling legalized incest because it does not specifically rule it out.
 
Why do you keep insisting that the absence of a limitation is the legalization of an unrelated issue?

That is literally how U.S. law works. It is not illegal until specified as illegal.
 
That is literally how U.S. law works. It is not illegal until specified as illegal.

Well then according to you incest was legalized long ago. Because that's "literally how U.S law works".
 
Incest is illegal in several states.
 
Incest is illegal in several states.

Yeap. The was a fact presented to you earlier in the thread. But you insisted if marriage decisions do not specifically rule out incest then those laws that prohibit incest are overturned. Which means they were overturned when the SCOTUS determined that you can marry anyone of any race without setting limitations.

I mean according to you we can marry toddlers as well.
 
Last edited:
Literally several.
 
Back
Top Bottom