• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breaking: US S.Ct. Rules Same Sex Marriage Constitutionally Protected[W:320]

Well now, you can leave your millions to your cat. :mrgreen:

6 Cats Who Inherited Fortunes - Catster

And had to have an executor/caretaker to make decisions for the cat on how that money was used. It is still adult humans who actually control the money, even if it is in a way being done as a combination of posthumously by the will of the owner of the cat and currently in how the executor of that will or caretaker(s) of that cat feel is best to care for the cat. No cat can be claimed legitimately on tax documents. No cat could legitimately become a person's legal spouse, not in the US.
 
Right, like your obama wasn't a total screw up.
You certainly do live up to your name. Because, you're living in a fantasy world if you think obama has done any good to my country.

Obama isn't MY Obama....sorry. And compared to the previous clown who left a huge mess for the next guy to clean up....Obama has done ok.....not great...but certainly better.

But besides that....which of the current Wackos running for the GOP nomination do you think even stands half a chance of getting elected President?
 
Yeah, because Obama is doing such a great job! And Hillary is so loved. LOL!

If the GOP had a viable candidate you might have a point....the problem is...they are falling over each other seeing who can out wacko the next. This election isn't even going to be close....and once Hillary is in and Julian Castro serves the next 8 years after her....perhaps the GOP will recover enough to find a decent candidate to put up.
 
You believe that 4 is bigger than 5? Do you believe that the Chief Justice has more sway/authority than the other Justice? Do you know how someone becomes a Chief Justice?

Lets see if you can answer these three questions....and then tell me what is incorrect about my post you are referring to. (Somehow...I suspect all we will see is shuffle and dodge.....surprise us)

No, I'd rather you continue on displaying your lack of knowledge on the subject as you trumpet how much you know about it. It's far funnier that way. Do your own research.
 
And had to have an executor/caretaker to make decisions for the cat on how that money was used. It is still adult humans who actually control the money, even if it is in a way being done as a combination of posthumously by the will of the owner of the cat and currently in how the executor of that will or caretaker(s) of that cat feel is best to care for the cat. No cat can be claimed legitimately on tax documents. No cat could legitimately become a person's legal spouse, not in the US.

You mean not yet. :mrgreen:
 
Nope, and if you knew as much about the constitution as you claim you'd know better than to ask that question.

What do you believe Loving v. Virginia was based on. What was the holding of the court? What analysis did the court undertake to reach its holding?
Do you know?
 
No, I'd rather you continue on displaying your lack of knowledge on the subject as you trumpet how much you know about it. It's far funnier that way. Do your own research.

LOL....just like I predicted. Shuffle and Dodge. Dude....you haven't a clue what you are talking about and your continual dodges put your ignorance on display for all to see. I'll give you another chance and then I will answer it for you.
 
Obama isn't MY Obama....sorry. And compared to the previous clown who left a huge mess for the next guy to clean up...

Let me wake you up right there. I'm sure by "clown" you mean our last legitimate President, Bush. But, he didn't leave your obama anything. The mess pResident obama inherited he got from senator obama and his fellow democrats in congress.
 
What do you believe Loving v. Virginia was based on. What was the holding of the court? What analysis did the court undertake to reach its holding?
Do you know?

Do you? Do your own research. Interracial marriage does not equal homosexual marriage. Perhaps as you're desperately combing through your searches to appear as if you knew the answers all along you'll discover why. Could be a learning experience for you.
 
You mean not yet. :mrgreen:

Not likely anytime in the foreseeable future. The only push to even give animals rights is for very limited rights, nothing really like that humans have. There is no way that the next 100 or so years is likely to see us giving up cats or dogs, our pets, which would be required to even consider such a change. There is no way that you could legitimately consider a cat either a spouse or an owned pet, nor could you consider them both at the same time.
 
Let me wake you up right there. I'm sure by "clown" you mean our last legitimate President, Bush. But, he didn't leave your obama anything. The mess pResident obama inherited he got from senator obama and his fellow democrats in congress.

LOL.....you are in serious denial if you don't believe that GWB left a mess when he left the whitehouse. He will forever be known as the "Herbert Hoover of the 21st Century"
 
LOL....just like I predicted. Shuffle and Dodge. Dude....you haven't a clue what you are talking about and your continual dodges put your ignorance on display for all to see. I'll give you another chance and then I will answer it for you.

You didn't predict anything. You have continually demonstrated you don't know dick about the constitution or constitutional law, that is what's on display. I don't need another chance to tell you to do your own research.
 
Do you? Do your own research. Interracial marriage does not equal homosexual marriage. Perhaps as you're desperately combing through your searches to appear as if you knew the answers all along you'll discover why. Could be a learning experience for you.

I'm asking you if you know what the courts analysis was based on. I suspect that you haven't a clue.
 
You didn't predict anything. You have continually demonstrated you don't know dick about the constitution or constitutional law, that is what's on display. I don't need another chance to tell you to do your own research.

Says the person who cannot answer a single question about conlaw......just shuffle and dodge.....shuffle and dodge.
 
Not likely anytime in the foreseeable future. The only push to even give animals rights is for very limited rights, nothing really like that humans have. There is no way that the next 100 or so years is likely to see us giving up cats or dogs, our pets, which would be required to even consider such a change. There is no way that you could legitimately consider a cat either a spouse or an owned pet, nor could you consider them both at the same time.

You're right, sex bots will get there first. :mrgreen:
 
LOL.....you are in serious denial if you don't believe that GWB left a mess when he left the whitehouse.

You are in serious denial if you think that he did.
Or, did you forget how good you had it before the country went crazy and put democrats in charge of congress?

People still had houses and cars. Gasoline was selling at $2.34 a gallon. Unemployment was at 4.6% and falling. The Dow was at 12,400 (without quantitative easing) and rising. And our national debt was around $8.5 trillion. Well below our GDP.
Things were pretty good back then compared to now. Well, gasoline is still pretty low. But, that's in spite of obama and not because of him.
 
Says the person who cannot answer a single question about conlaw......just shuffle and dodge.....shuffle and dodge.

Sorry, your failed attempts at playing professor on a subject you've a demonstrated lack of knowledge with grow funnier by the moment.
 
Right, like your obama wasn't a total screw up.
You certainly do live up to your name. Because, you're living in a fantasy world if you think obama has done any good to my country.

I'm no huge fan of Obama at this point because of the ACA, but you're living in LaLaLand if you don't recognize a legacy right in front of your face.

Obama has racked up quite a list of historical accomplishments during his 7 years in office. And he did it in the face of almost total obstruction by the other party, whose primary goal was not to let Obama accomplish anything (rather than helping we, the people, or the country - sounds almost traitorous, doesn't it?).

Whether one likes the accomplishments or not, this last week alone was historical among presidencies: a huge trade deal; a win fighting terminology in the ACA for subsidies in exchanges; and a gay marriage Supreme Court decision. Add that to the killing of Osama bin Laden, signing into law the Lilly Ledbetter Act (equal wages for women), anda host of other accomplishments. It's really remarkable. Starting with his election and re-election, as a black man.

Historically, it'll be Washington, Lincoln, FDR, Reagan, Obama.
 
Let me educate you a little.......clownboy.



The Court in Loving v. Virginia found that the right to marry was a "Fundamental Right" under the substantive due process clause of the 14th Amendment. It then engaged in what is called "Strict Scrutiny"...which the Court applies whenever a suspect class or fundamental right is involved. In order for the governmental restriction to prevail, the government must show a compelling governmental interest to justify the action.

The Court in the recent marriage equality case engaged in the same exact analysis.


Sorry dude.....but you lose.


Try picking up a textbook and reading a little before you come to the table next time.
 
You didn't predict anything. You have continually demonstrated you don't know dick about the constitution or constitutional law, that is what's on display. I don't need another chance to tell you to do your own research.

Same sex marriage rules law of the land.

Bonus points: Canada, Mexico, USA. All legal.

Learn it, Live it , Love it
 
Same sex marriage rules law of the land.

Bonus points: Canada, Mexico, USA. All legal.

Learn it, Live it , Love it

So is corporate personhood and that right there is outside the constitution as well.

I'll never love the announcement that our Judicial system has abandoned their oaths and unmoored themselves from the constitution. You go right ahead and celebrate that.
 
I'm no huge fan of Obama at this point because of the ACA, but you're living in LaLaLand if you don't recognize a legacy right in front of your face.

Obama has racked up quite a list of historical accomplishments during his 7 years in office. And he did it in the face of almost total obstruction by the other party, whose primary goal was not to let Obama accomplish anything (rather than helping we, the people, or the country - sounds almost traitorous, doesn't it?).

Whether one likes the accomplishments or not, this last week alone was historical among presidencies: a huge trade deal; a win fighting terminology in the ACA for subsidies in exchanges; and a gay marriage Supreme Court decision. Add that to the killing of Osama bin Laden, signing into law the Lilly Ledbetter Act (equal wages for women), anda host of other accomplishments. It's really remarkable. Starting with his election and re-election, as a black man.

Historically, it'll be Washington, Lincoln, FDR, Reagan, Obama.

ACA is a disaster, anyone would have gone after binladen and not hesitated like obama did, the lilly ledbetter act wasn't needed (and neither obama or hillary abides by it in the first place), etc,etc,etc...
What you call accomplishments are a pumped up list of fluff, failures and soon to be failures.
And, obama isn't black. He just plays one on TV.
 
Back
Top Bottom