• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Virginia governor orders Confederate flag removed from license plates

Well, the obvious answer is for everyone to go armed at all times in every place including obviously church services, so we can prevent shootings with a 0.00000001% chance of happening. WWJD? Pack his Glock!

No, that's not the obvious answer.

You don't need "everyone" to go armed...just enough to go armed to protect the others.

In any case, are you willing to let people die just because you see such an attack as having a low chance of happening? Do you think the people who died would agree with you? Or what about the more than 300 people that Jeanne Assan protected? She wasn't the only one armed at the time, but she was the only one who fired on the nut-job. Maybe those 300+ people would agree with you that the chances are too low? Or, maybe you don't care that more than 300 people were likely to die...as long as it keeps guns out of law-abiding people's hands?
 
Never said I flew it or even condoned flying it, I'm a Unionist. I am only pointing out that Slavery, segregation, Jim Crow laws, Japanese internment camps and racially targeted abortions are all the proud history of the Democratic Party.

I think most Democrats know the Democratic Party was once racist and the Republicans were once the progressive party. I don't think most Democrats are proud of the history. When LBJ signed the CRA of 1964 things started happening.
 
I think most Democrats know the Democratic Party was once racist and the Republicans were once the progressive party. I don't think most Democrats are proud of the history. When LBJ signed the CRA of 1964 things started happening.

LBJ and Democrats including Al Gore the Science Whore's dad fought AGAINST the Civil Rights Act....they filibustered it in Congress.


After LBJ signed it he said "Ill have those NIGGERS voting Democratic for the next 200 years". Only 150 years of the poverty plantation left for blacks to suffer with....
 
I wouldn't balk at the notion.... that's better than making it disappear altogether like so many idiots want.

it's a cool flag.. a cool symbol....
no need for it to disappear...well, except to calm the hypersensitive PC sissies who can't stop crying about it.

It does need to stop being upheld by the government, because it's a symbol of rebellion and treason against that government.
 
LBJ and Democrats including Al Gore the Science Whore's dad fought AGAINST the Civil Rights Act....they filibustered it in Congress.


After LBJ signed it he said "Ill have those NIGGERS voting Democratic for the next 200 years". Only 150 years of the poverty plantation left for blacks to suffer with....

So, Democrats fought against a bill that they thought would get black people toe vote Democrat? That's what you are saying?
 
It does need to stop being upheld by the government, because it's a symbol of rebellion and treason against that government.

both the US flag and the Confederate flag are symbols of rebellions and treason when you really think about it...though i'm sure you're going to tell me it's magically different.
 
Well, no duh. The Democrats are Evil. We all know that, and are single handedly responsible for all the ills of this great country. And it is the same party now as it was then which is why blacks vote 90% or more for the racist party, because they're too stupid to know that the party they align with is racist. Good points all.

BTW, slavery, segregation, and Jim Crow was ultimately the proud history of white southern conservatives. Nearly 100% of democrats in the non-CSA states voted for the CRA and VRA. Nearly 100% of racist white southern democrats (that is nearly all those elected to national offices) voted against.

Ah, that old falsehood. The racist southern Democrats stuck with the Democrats because that was the party of subversive social programs and culling black folk in the womb. They never stopped thinking that blacks are inferior they just adopted the progressive ideal that white people need to fix black people. Their programs destroyed the black family and dismembered many millions of unborn black babies ensuring a dependent minority.
 
I think most Democrats know the Democratic Party was once racist and the Republicans were once the progressive party. I don't think most Democrats are proud of the history. When LBJ signed the CRA of 1964 things started happening.

No, Republicans were classic liberals until progressives ruined the word. Democrats believe blacks can't succeed without white people holding their hand, Conservatives know that blacks are just as capable as whites. Democrats see skin color and think they know the person. Democrats are still the party of racism.
 
No, Republicans were classic liberals until progressives ruined the word. Democrats believe blacks can't succeed without white people holding their hand, Conservatives know that blacks are just as capable as whites. Democrats see skin color and think they know the person. Democrats are still the party of racism.

Sure, that's why most blacks in Congress are Democrats; Republicans try to suppress the black vote; Why Democrats JFK/LBJ wanted public accommodation as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; voting rights; etc
 
both the US flag and the Confederate flag are symbols of rebellions and treason when you really think about it...though i'm sure you're going to tell me it's magically different.

You can tell me it's the same when the UK starts flying US flags over capital buildings ;)
 
both the US flag and the Confederate flag are symbols of rebellions and treason when you really think about it...though i'm sure you're going to tell me it's magically different.

One represents the entire country and the other one doesn't. As you should know, the entire country did not fight for slavery.
 
One represents the entire country and the other one doesn't. As you should know, the entire country did not fight for slavery.

which has nothing to do with my point.

the slavery issue is dead and gone... nobody today is fighting for slavery or racism.... but folks are surely fighting to ban thing like flags and movies( while simultaneously saying they actually support free speech/expression)

yes.. there's even people who want to ban "Gone with the Wind" now.... because once idiots start movements like this, there's always another idiot waiting to up the ante.
‘Gone with the Wind’ should go the way of the Confederate flag | New York Post
 
This frenzied overreaction is just insane.
 
This frenzied overreaction is just insane.

That is liberals for you. Tragedy always results in a liberal freakout to ban something. They already tried guns and failed...so they will go for an even lower hanging fruit.

Liberals will soon be rooting in the dirt for the next thing to ban....I assume it will be tied to global warming/climate change/whatever they are calling it this week.
 
which has nothing to do with my point.

the slavery issue is dead and gone... nobody today is fighting for slavery or racism.... but folks are surely fighting to ban thing like flags and movies( while simultaneously saying they actually support free speech/expression)

yes.. there's even people who want to ban "Gone with the Wind" now.... because once idiots start movements like this, there's always another idiot waiting to up the ante.
‘Gone with the Wind’ should go the way of the Confederate flag | New York Post
Banning by public opinion is free speech and so is protesting.

If slavery is such a dead issue then it shouldn't a problem to take down the flag that pro-slavery was fought under, should it?
 
Sure, that's why most blacks in Congress are Democrats; Republicans try to suppress the black vote; Why Democrats JFK/LBJ wanted public accommodation as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; voting rights; etc

JFK would have been bounced out of today's Democrat party, a party who today has more in common with the ideology of his assassin than they do with JFK.

And LBJ, well...

“I’ll have those n**** voting Democratic for the next 200 years.”
- Lyndon B. Johnson

And then there was Carter, since we are on the topic of the Confederate Flag..

CIE2HBhUcAAt22e.jpg

The objection by the Republican to the wording of the Public Accommodations section of the Civil Rights Act (again, pushed by the classic liberal Kennedy and Republicans, not by the DNC) was that it ran afoul of existing SCOTUS precedent and could scuttle the Civil Rights act in a Supreme Court challenge. Of the 117 Democrats that voted against the Civil Rights act of 1964 only a handful, 5 by my count (Iris Blitch, Arlen Specter, Strom Thurmond, Howard Callaway and Charles Pickering), switched parties to become Republican, the rest of those racists stuck with the Democrats. That is a conversion rate of... 4.3%

Sooooo.. 95.7% of Democrat Congressmen who voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stayed Democrat.

Hmmmmmm...
 
Banning by public opinion is free speech and so is protesting.
oh looky.. lefties have finally come up with a way to ban speech while pretending to support free speech...
I expect such nonsense from far right wingers... I never expected to see a day when lefties were calling for bans ... but here we are.. flags, movies, large sodas, etc etc etc etc ....etc...etc........etc.

If slavery is such a dead issue then it shouldn't a problem to take down the flag that pro-slavery was fought under, should it?
I know it's asking alot, but maybe you should reconsider your belief over why it's still around....it's obviously not an endorsement of slavery or racism, so I wonder what it could be?

oh never mind,I'm being silly asking lefties to think... we all know there is only one reason and one reason only that flag still exists... support for slavery and nothign else....derp derp.
 
oh looky.. lefties have finally come up with a way to ban speech while pretending to support free speech...
I expect such nonsense from far right wingers... I never expected to see a day when lefties were calling for bans ... but here we are.. flags, movies, large sodas, etc etc etc etc ....etc...etc........etc.

I know it's asking alot, but maybe you should reconsider your belief over why it's still around....it's obviously not an endorsement of slavery or racism, so I wonder what it could be?

oh never mind,I'm being silly asking lefties to think... we all know there is only one reason and one reason only that flag still exists... support for slavery and nothign else....derp derp.


Do you think willful ignorance and insults is helping your argument much?
 
oh looky.. lefties have finally come up with a way to ban speech while pretending to support free speech...
I expect such nonsense from far right wingers... I never expected to see a day when lefties were calling for bans ... but here we are.. flags, movies, large sodas, etc etc etc etc ....etc...etc........etc.

I know it's asking alot, but maybe you should reconsider your belief over why it's still around....it's obviously not an endorsement of slavery or racism, so I wonder what it could be?

oh never mind,I'm being silly asking lefties to think... we all know there is only one reason and one reason only that flag still exists... support for slavery and nothign else....derp derp.

Oh dear god it's another one of these people who thinks banning confederate flags is the discussion.

Who keeps telling you guys this? What right-wing ****rag has been telling all of you "LIBRULS WANT TO BAN CONFEDERATE FLAGS," and why did you believe them?
 
Back
Top Bottom