• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A woman will appear on redesigned $10 bill in 2020

Yea that racist piece of DEMOCRAT FECES Woodrow Wilson ****ed us over with both the IRS and FED. Thanks a lot, Democrats.


He ran that BS through on Christmas Eve IIRC. Scumbag move, typical though.

Good thing President Theodore Roosevelt ran on the third-party Bull Moose so Wilson could win huh?

Just another great reason to have TR on Mt. Rushmore, eh ?
 
I am quite okay with putting a woman on a new denomination of currency....as long as it is a woman deserving of the honor.
I would rule out spouses of presidents.

Unless Hillary becomes President .
 
Good thing President Theodore Roosevelt ran on the third-party Bull Moose so Wilson could win huh?

Just another great reason to have TR on Mt. Rushmore, eh ?

Why would that be a good reason?
 
Unless Hillary becomes President .

Shes an absolutely ****ing atrocious unbearable C WORD....but yea, her buying the Presidency would be worthy of consideration unfortunately. Bitches like her are why there are so many divorces.

Since Jefferson's on the $2 bill, how about Sally Hemings on the $10 bill ?

Speaking of hemming, how about Betsy Ross?
 
Shes an absolutely ****ing atrocious unbearable C WORD....but yea, her buying the Presidency would be worthy of consideration unfortunately. Bitches like her are why there are so many divorces.



Speaking of hemming, how about Betsy Ross?

What do you think the reason is that women haven't accomplished as much as men in American history?
 
Is that a real question?

I wanted to know what action was taken that you think no woman in the history of this country can top. Clearly you have no answer. Nobody is shocked.

Wild guess. You're not married, are you?
 
Yea that racist piece of DEMOCRAT FECES Woodrow Wilson ****ed us over with both the IRS and FED. Thanks a lot, Democrats.


He ran that BS through on Christmas Eve IIRC. Scumbag move, typical though.

Wilson was a puppet for the Money Trust. He never would have even won that election if the Money Trust had not financed the campaign of Teddy Roosevelt - thus splitting the Republican vote and dooming Taft.

Harding and Coolidge weren't puppets for the Establishment, but they didn't do anything to end the Fed. Then Hoover, though somewhat reluctant, began to implement the New Deal before FDR ever got in there. It was under FDR though, fully under the control of the Establishment, and fully committed to destroying America's foundation, that the Establishment was able to rewrite the Constitution and transform America from a Republic to a Democracy.

Every President since FDR has been an Establishment puppet. The only one to stand up to them at all was JFK, and he paid for that with his life.

The 20th century is a sad tale of deception, takeover, and decline for the United States of America. Most Americans would disagree with that, but then again most Americans have been indoctrinated in government schools who teach a curriculum fashioned by the Establishment - it is no wonder most Americans haven't the foggiest notion about the principles of freedom and the importance of our founding.
 
Wilson was a puppet for the Money Trust. He never would have even won that election if the Money Trust had not financed the campaign of Teddy Roosevelt - thus splitting the Republican vote and dooming Taft.

Harding and Coolidge weren't puppets for the Establishment, but they didn't do anything to end the Fed. Then Hoover, though somewhat reluctant, began to implement the New Deal before FDR ever got in there. It was under FDR though, fully under the control of the Establishment, and fully committed to destroying America's foundation, that the Establishment was able to rewrite the Constitution and transform America from a Republic to a Democracy.

Every President since FDR has been an Establishment puppet. The only one to stand up to them at all was JFK, and he paid for that with his life.

The 20th century is a sad tale of deception, takeover, and decline for the United States of America. Most Americans would disagree with that, but then again most Americans have been indoctrinated in government schools who teach a curriculum fashioned by the Establishment - it is no wonder most Americans haven't the foggiest notion about the principles of freedom and the importance of our founding.

Kind of going OT here but based on what you said, why in the hell would the money trust have funded Teddy Roosevelt, the preeminent destroyer of monopolies.
 
This is silly. No woman has ever really accomplished anything noteworthy in the history of the country. Rosa Parks?? HAHAHA. There are thousands of men more deserving.

Years ago when I used to frequent the campus of West Point, I came across the monument of Margaret Corbin, someone my grandmother (a mucky muck with the DAR) told me about many times as the only woman to fight alongside the men in battle during the war of independence.

Margaret (née Cochran) Corbin (November 12, 1751 – January 16, 1800) was a woman who fought in the American Revolutionary War.[1] On November 16, 1776, she and her husband, John Corbin, both from Philadelphia, along with some 600 American soldiers, were defending Fort Washington in northern Manhattan from 4,000 attacking Hessian troops under British command. John and Margaret crewed one of two cannons the defenders possessed. When her husband fell, Margaret took his place at his cannon and continued firing until she, herself, was seriously wounded. She later became the first woman in U.S. history to receive a pension from Congress for military service.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if states like Texas actually came out with textbooks declaring that there weren't even people living in this continent before Europeans showed up. It was just a barren wasteland that had waited on the arrival of the British for 5607 years... you know, seeing that the earth is only 6K years old.

An American "pioneer" goes into the "wilderness" and says, "my God..look at all of this untouched land!" and proceeds to ignore the nice pathways and trails established by Native American traders that he's walking on.

The textbooks may not be willing to say it, but a lot of people kind of reference those tropes. Anytime they conflate American emigration westward with development or taming of the west it's basically an old adage of Frederick Jackson Turner and those like him who had the gift of ignoring Native Americans by turning off their mental light switches. Americans moving West: light switch turns on. Americans walking in front of vast infrastructure developed over centuries of geopolitical conflict and trade: light switch turns off.
 
Last edited:
I think Margaret Chase Smith (First woman to serve in both houses of Congress and first woman to be placed in nomination for the presidency at a major party convention) should be put on the $10 bill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Chase_Smith
 
I think Margaret Chase Smith (First woman to serve in both houses of Congress and first woman to be placed in nomination for the presidency at a major party convention) should be put on the $10 bill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Chase_Smith

Not knocking your suggestions or reasons, I'd bet no woman representing a modern political party will make the cut considering how polarized the country is at the moment.
 
I'm just kind of a fan of Harriet Tubman. To be a woman in that era plus being black in that era and bucking the system they way she did... quintessentially American to be on the right side of history thumbing her nose at America itself only to be proven right by history. She went against America and ended up having America change to be more like her.
 
Kind of going OT here but based on what you said, why in the hell would the money trust have funded Teddy Roosevelt, the preeminent destroyer of monopolies.

Because Roosevelt would steal votes from Taft... it's that simple.

Morgan was the principle backer of Roosevelt - the whole time his intent, and the intent of his Wall Street buddies, was to make sure their puppet (Wilson) would win.

Once Wilson was elected, he did everything they wanted - the two most important things being The Federal Reserve Act, formerly known as the Aldrich Act (Remember Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller?? Aldrich was his grandfather), and his committed entrance into WW I.

WW I provided the Establishment the cover they needed to overthrow Czar Nicholas and establishment a communist (antithesis) foothold in Russia.

P.S. It is worth noting that Wilson wrote after he left office, "... I have unwittingly ruined my country" - he should have thought of that before he agreed to do the bidding of those monsters.
 
Years ago when I used to frequent the campus of West Point, I came across the monument of Margaret Corbin, someone my grandmother (a mucky muck with the DAR) told me about many times as the only woman to fight alongside the men in battle during the war of independence.

wasn't she the one they called Molly Pitcher or something like that
 
This is silly. No woman has ever really accomplished anything noteworthy in the history of the country.

No woman has ever really accomplished anything noteworthy in the history of this country.... Hmm. Well, Lincoln's mother gave birth to Lincoln. That's noteworthy. Maybe we should put her mug on the $5 bill.
 
No woman has ever really accomplished anything noteworthy in the history of this country.... Hmm. Well, Lincoln's mother gave birth to Lincoln. That's noteworthy. Maybe we should put her mug on the $5 bill.

Not sure which is worse in that post, the abject stupidity of it, or the complete insecurity of the poster.
 
wasn't she the one they called Molly Pitcher or something like that

No, but you've corrected a rusty memory. Molly Pitcher was Mary Hayes, who also loaded cannon in battle.

The distinction Maggie had was she was the only woman wounded in active fighting.

Both cool stories though.
 
Not sure which is worse in that post, the abject stupidity of it, or the complete insecurity of the poster.

Or the complete accuracy? You are just mad cuz yuh wittow feewings wuh huut.
 
No, but you've corrected a rusty memory. Molly Pitcher was Mary Hayes, who also loaded cannon in battle.

The distinction Maggie had was she was the only woman wounded in active fighting.

Both cool stories though.

I didn't google it. I recall Molly pitcher in a painting where she was swabbing the cannon (practice was to swab the cannon after firing to prevent remaining sparks from blowing up the charge-the heat of the barrel evaporated the water before the next charge was put into the cannon. after her husband fell to the enemy
 
Or the complete accuracy? You are just mad cuz yuh wittow feewings wuh huut.

Thanks for living down to the stereotype we have of you.
 
Back
Top Bottom