• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224:1119]

Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Unfortunately, you are discussing an ex post facto (after the event) evaluation. Mental health specialists have warned us for years about signs indicating the potential for violence to be found in some individuals, unfortunately not every person who exhibits the signs goes on to commit violence against others. Who picks the ones who are to be refused a gun?
That's the problem. Little can be done until after the crime has been committed.

However the price for freedom can sometimes be quite high and this is the occasional price, sad though it is, that is often paid.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Of course we have a pathological rage problem.

So does every nation in the world.

Only in this country does that rage problem progress to regular, periodic mass murders.

That's mostly thanks to our lax gun laws, compounded with a pathological gun culture.

BS and stop pretending that what motivates the "anti gun culture" is public safety
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

That's the problem. Little can be done until after the crime has been committed.

However the price for freedom can sometimes be quite high and this is the occasional price, sad though it is, that is often paid.

and any attempts at prior restraint disarm a million honest victims for every kamikaze killer it slightly inconveniences.

the people most likely to get a gun are those willing to die using one

most gun banners have never figured out the difference between elastic and inelastic demand
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

duh, why clutter up the thread with this sort of nonsense? by definition a GUN SHOT would involves guns. So I ask-so what?

We are Discussing the causes of why an obviously mentally deranged guy killed multiple people and had easy access to a gun.

Not sure how bringing in discussion of how a guy like this got a gun, and why the culture around him was obviously OK with it could be considered 'clutter'.

But then again, a rabid partisan would think that.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

BS and stop pretending that what motivates the "anti gun culture" is public safety

Yes. My entire point is to take your toys away and sentence you to an existence devoid of freedom. Like Europeans.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

We are Discussing the causes of why an obviously mentally deranged guy killed multiple people and had easy access to a gun.

Not sure how bringing in discussion of how a guy like this got a gun, and why the culture around him was obviously OK with it could be considered 'clutter'.

But then again, a rabid partisan would think that.

your major fail is claiming that he wouldn't have obtained a gun if some laws you are unwilling to suggest-had been in place

rabid partisan-whining about guns when this guy was a premeditated murderer. yeah, your desired gun laws would keep him from getting guns just like laws banning crack means we have no crack addicts
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Yes. My entire point is to take your toys away and sentence you to an existence devoid of freedom. Like Europeans.

yeah I know-your goal is to harass gun owners because we don't buy into your leftwing agenda. but we already knew that long before you admitted it.

I don't believe anyone who actually spends time arguing this issue is stupid to the point of believing that their desired gun bans or gun restrictions are really going to have much impact on people willing to die to kill others. So the only rational conclusion is the desire is to harass honest gun owners
 
Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

He didn't just develop these views. He was taught these views. Not at a young age (best we can tell) but after becoming an adult. I don't think it is a coincidence that he started looking to murder when he started reading up on racist propaganda. I suppose there is a very very very slim chance that he happened to develop a disorder that made him suddenly prone to violence right when he started reading this crap, but more likely he read this crap and it grow hate. And hate for many turns to violence.

Have you read his manifesto? Those aren't the words of a crazy person. Those are the words of someone who knew exactly what he was going to do, and why he was going to do it.

I didn't read his manifesto. But normal people don't write manifestos that is for sure. But let me explain something though:

You don't just "develop" these things. They don't pop up over a year or 2. They develop over years. And sometimes the person who seems to just "snap" displayed warning signs that were missed. Like with this kid: increasing involvement in a hate group? Petty criminal crap? Drug use? Does that seriously not sound to you like he was devolving? He began fixating on this stuff. Yes. But are you seriously going to suggest his fixation on racist bull**** is the cause and not the symptom?

The evidence here just seems VERY strong that he wasn't just a "race motivated" murderer. He lashed out in much the same way we see other mass shooters. The only wrinkle was he didn't target society, he targeted a SPECIFIC subculture in society. That alone doesn't erase the fact that this kid had problems. Problems back in high school too.

So tell me. So you honestly believe he is simply a race motivated murderer? This was nothing more than a terrorist attack by a lone white supremacist? Or do you think he showed signs of being your typical mass shooter with the added wrinkle of targeting blacks?

Keep in mind that in Newtown...that kid targeted who he though were stealing his mom. Columbine saw "bullies" targeted. It is very similar across these incidents. You have to give me that at least.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

yeah I know-your goal is to harass gun owners because we don't buy into your leftwing agenda. but we already knew that long before you admitted it.

I don't believe anyone who actually spends time arguing this issue is stupid to the point of believing that their desired gun bans or gun restrictions are really going to have much impact on people willing to die to kill others. So the only rational conclusion is the desire is to harass honest gun owners

Except for the fact that it works everyone here else in the world.

Of course, people in other counties don't whine about 'being harassed' much as you do though.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Except for the fact that it works everyone here else in the world.

Of course, people in other counties don't whine about 'being harassed' much as you do though.

no it doesn't so stop fibbing

Mexico has far worse gun control than we do and far higher murder rates. and you are in no position to say what other people state about their country's gun control schemes

you spend a lot of time on this board bashing gun owners for the simple fact that you don't like our politics and you then complain that we point that out

your posts don't even pretend your attacks on gun ownership is motivated by some faux public safety concern
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

no it doesn't so stop fibbing

Mexico has far worse gun control than we do and far higher murder rates. and you are in no position to say what other people state about their country's gun control schemes

you spend a lot of time on this board bashing gun owners for the simple fact that you don't like our politics and you then complain that we point that out

your posts don't even pretend your attacks on gun ownership is motivated by some faux public safety concern

Poor you. So persecuted.

How about you look at a first world developed nation?
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Poor you. So persecuted.

How about you look at a first world developed nation?

so each time you get schooled on posting nonsense, you change the goal posts

how is the murder rate in Russia these days?

and I am not persecuted, I am well armed. But your goal is purely to harass gun owners.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

can I point out one reality to the liberals here: Guns are NEVER going to be outlawed.

Guns have as much of a chance of being outlawed as ABORTION has of being outlawed. The issues are different but so very similar.

my point is this: when liberals make statements about how guns should be outlawed you sound EVERY BIT OUT OF TOUCH as those who say they want abortion outlawed. You are living in a fantasy world, NOT the current world the rest of us live in.

just letting you know how you come off. think about it
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

can I point out one reality to the liberals here: Guns are NEVER going to be outlawed.

Guns have as much of a chance of being outlawed as ABORTION has of being outlawed. The issues are different but so very similar.

my point is this: when liberals make statements about how guns should be outlawed you sound EVERY BIT OUT OF TOUCH as those who say they want abortion outlawed. You are living in a fantasy world, NOT the current world the rest of us live in.

just letting you know how you come off. think about it

all sorts of guns have been outlawed in some states

your point is mainly sound but guns have been banned. DC banned handguns until the supremes bitch slapped the city. Chicago-same result

the standard issue military rifle is banned in the USA

things are getting better but we still need to wash away the stench of gun banning
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

I didn't read his manifesto. But normal people don't write manifestos that is for sure. But let me explain something though:

No, normal people don't. I agree this guy is not normal.

You don't just "develop" these things. They don't pop up over a year or 2. They develop over years. And sometimes the person who seems to just "snap" displayed warning signs that were missed. Like with this kid: increasing involvement in a hate group? Petty criminal crap? Drug use? Does that seriously not sound to you like he was devolving? He began fixating on this stuff. Yes. But are you seriously going to suggest his fixation on racist bull**** is the cause and not the symptom?

Yes. I do think the racist propaganda he was the cause of his action, and not a symptom of a different underlying mental illness. Now I am basing that off of what I have heard and read about him prior to his looking up Martin. Personal accounts of his personality from friends and family paint a different picture of this kid from prior to and after him reading up on information from these hate groups.

The evidence here just seems VERY strong that he wasn't just a "race motivated" murderer. He lashed out in much the same way we see other mass shooters. The only wrinkle was he didn't target society, he targeted a SPECIFIC subculture in society. That alone doesn't erase the fact that this kid had problems. Problems back in high school too.

I haven't heard anything about his problems in high school. That doens't mean they didnt exist, only that i haven't heard them.

So tell me. So you honestly believe he is simply a race motivated murderer?

At this point right now I think this was a kid who stumbled upon these sites and began reading. These people have a way of making people see things from their views. Almost like brainwashing. I am not sure of the right word to use.

This was nothing more than a terrorist attack by a lone white supremacist?

I think he is responsible for what he did, but I don't see it as a lone attack. There are other factors at play. He was steered toward this mindset, and was driven toward these actions. The actual was he was alone, but he was not alone. There have been a lot of people manipulated in similar ways. there are many more working toward it. It is not just the mentally ill who are suceptable to this kind of ****. We do need to address mental illness, and I am sure many mass murderers do suffer from mental illesses. But I don't see this incident as a mental health issue so much as I see it as a racist problem. These groups continually sow their seeds of hate, at some point these groups need to be addressed.

Keep in mind that in Newtown...that kid targeted who he though were stealing his mom. Columbine saw "bullies" targeted. It is very similar across these incidents. You have to give me that at least.

I view the Newtown murders more from confusion. I don't understand why that happened.

Columbine I think those kids were pushed to the breaking point and snapped. I do think mental illness played a role. But I dont think the mental illness they suffered was natural. I think it was caused.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

no it doesn't so stop fibbing

Mexico has far worse gun control than we do and far higher murder rates. and you are in no position to say what other people state about their country's gun control schemes

you spend a lot of time on this board bashing gun owners for the simple fact that you don't like our politics and you then complain that we point that out

your posts don't even pretend your attacks on gun ownership is motivated by some faux public safety concern


The TurtleDude is deep into the gun-loving culture but I do wonder how much he knows about other nation's attitudes toward gun control.

This past weekend, the Washington Post provided a video of an Australian comic's take on America's gun fetish. I will provide the link but as the Post noted: Also, a warning: The video has adult language. Don't play too loudly at work or around kids!
An Australian comic on what U.S. gun laws look like to the rest of the world - The Washington Post
In the article is another link to an article on the various studies undertaken since Australian instituted strict gun ownership laws. The one finding that no one argued about was the steep drop in suicide rates following the change in gun laws. Did gun control work in Australia?
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

No, normal people don't. I agree this guy is not normal.



Yes. I do think the racist propaganda he was the cause of his action, and not a symptom of a different underlying mental illness. Now I am basing that off of what I have heard and read about him prior to his looking up Martin. Personal accounts of his personality from friends and family paint a different picture of this kid from prior to and after him reading up on information from these hate groups.



I haven't heard anything about his problems in high school. That doens't mean they didnt exist, only that i haven't heard them.



At this point right now I think this was a kid who stumbled upon these sites and began reading. These people have a way of making people see things from their views. Almost like brainwashing. I am not sure of the right word to use.



I think he is responsible for what he did, but I don't see it as a lone attack. There are other factors at play. He was steered toward this mindset, and was driven toward these actions. The actual was he was alone, but he was not alone. There have been a lot of people manipulated in similar ways. there are many more working toward it. It is not just the mentally ill who are suceptable to this kind of ****. We do need to address mental illness, and I am sure many mass murderers do suffer from mental illesses. But I don't see this incident as a mental health issue so much as I see it as a racist problem. These groups continually sow their seeds of hate, at some point these groups need to be addressed.



I view the Newtown murders more from confusion. I don't understand why that happened.

Columbine I think those kids were pushed to the breaking point and snapped. I do think mental illness played a role. But I dont think the mental illness they suffered was natural. I think it was caused.

I can only respond to the bottom. I will do the rest later. But what you said in the last 2 is important. Really just the last. Mental illness, diagnosable and true psychological damage CAN be developed. And it can be caused by events in life. Drugs can do this (even marijuana to young users). Or post traumatic stress. I don't disagree with that about columbine.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

so each time you get schooled on posting nonsense, you change the goal posts

how is the murder rate in Russia these days?

and I am not persecuted, I am well armed. But your goal is purely to harass gun owners.

No goal post moving at all.

I've been saying the same thing.

You may be well armed with guns, but you aren't with logic, common sense, or shame.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Moderator's Warning:
This thread is now under a no tolerance warning. There will be no more personal remarks. No more snipes. No more *wink wink* or *cough cough* indirect insulting. Even the slightest bit of toeing the line will get you either infracted, thread banned or both.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

The TurtleDude is deep into the gun-loving culture but I do wonder how much he knows about other nation's attitudes toward gun control.

This past weekend, the Washington Post provided a video of an Australian comic's take on America's gun fetish. I will provide the link but as the Post noted: Also, a warning: The video has adult language. Don't play too loudly at work or around kids!
An Australian comic on what U.S. gun laws look like to the rest of the world - The Washington Post
In the article is another link to an article on the various studies undertaken since Australian instituted strict gun ownership laws. The one finding that no one argued about was the steep drop in suicide rates following the change in gun laws. Did gun control work in Australia?

This comedian's nonsense has been on this board several times-generally pro rights advocates note how silly it is. Suicide is an interesting topic given so many people are advocating for assisted suicide these days. Its not a legitimate reason to restrict guns
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

I can only respond to the bottom. I will do the rest later. But what you said in the last 2 is important. Really just the last. Mental illness, diagnosable and true psychological damage CAN be developed. And it can be caused by events in life. Drugs can do this (even marijuana to young users). Or post traumatic stress. I don't disagree with that about columbine.

Can be developed yes, but again, I think you're looking at this the wrong way. (Setting aside the question if mental illness contributed to this tragedy)

I think you're looking at this as if mental illness is source of the problem, a problem which can manifest itself as a racist killer.

The view that I (and I think others) take, is that the problem here is racism in the form of widespread propaganda. In this case, right wing propaganda in the aftermath of the Zimmerman/Martin case. And when certain susceptible people, ie the mentally ill, societal outcasts, psychopaths, etc.. are exposed to only biased information, a few of them will funnel that hatred into violent acts. But the driving cause of their actions isn't mental illness, it's racism.

I don't view Roof as a monster, any more than I view Tsarnaev or any of the 9/11 hijackers as monsters. They're individuals doing what they thought was right. It doesn't make them moral or any less culpable, but if we want to reduce the number of future incidents then we have to understand why people do horrible things.

So if we want to start pointing fingers, then the best place to start is at all of us. Far too many of us see racism and turn a blind eye, or ignore it all together. Others stoke the fires of racial hatred for political or partisan gain. Still others promote an underground of hatred. They might not commit any acts of violence; but were it not for them this tragedy would not have happened.

We need to take stock of our own biases and prejudices. Having them doesn't make us bad people, it makes us human. What makes us bad is refusing to look for them or pretending that they're not there. We also all need to acknowledge that most African Americans exist in a world that most whites can't relate to. They regularly deal with problems that whites never encounter. White privilege is a real thing. It doesn't mean that whites don't work hard, or aren't deserving of success. It just means that maybe some empathy is in order.

That's why I'm torn about this whole flag thing. It's great that a number of members of the GOP have condemned it, and we should all applaud them. But I worry that the taking down of the flag is a distraction from the real problems. Maybe at the end of a long drawn out debate, SC will "accede" to the blacks demands and "placate" them by removing the flag.. And we can feel good about ourselves because we've "solved" the problem of racism once and for all... all without actually changing anything or asking any hard questions about ourselves.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Rather muddled thinking. You have this.
The view that I (and I think others) take, is that the problem here is racism in the form of widespread propaganda. In this case, right wing propaganda in the aftermath of the Zimmerman/Martin case.
Then this.
So if we want to start pointing fingers, then the best place to start is at all of us.
Then this.
We need to take stock of our own biases and prejudices.
Yes, indeed!
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

you're are advocating gun bans. nothing is sensible about the stuff you support other than trying to ban guns

and most gun banners-if not all are liberals, lefties, socialists, progressives etc.. when I see the nonsense about gun fetishes its a dead giveaway that the motivation for gun control is cultural-=has nothing to do with stopping criminals

You've no clue. By your logic, it's an unconstitutional gun ban to restrict the public from buying 20MM helicopter-capable chain guns.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

My mistake - I foolishly took your previous comments to be your views and not just trolling. Perhaps my mistake came from your comments in post #584 where you claimed that most whites in the south "accept" racism.

Does "most whites in the South accept racism" EQUAL "an entire ideology is racist"? No. The mistake was yours, and everything I stated is true.

Or perhaps my mistake stems from your comments in post #600 where you claimed that conservative politics makes these tragedies more likely and that in the case of this tragedy conservative politics were "almost certainly" involved.

Does "conservative politics makes these tragedies more likely" EQUAL "every conflict is racism"? No. The mistake was yours, and everything I stated is true.

In future, I'll be sure simply to ignore such comments as these since you like to ignore them as well after you've posted them.

No, I doubt that. I figure you'll still respond, but only after making sure that no light of reality penetrates those assumption-colored glasses you're wearing - you know, the ones that lead you to make epic logical fails like those you've made in the past few replies.
 
Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Well then...isn't it broad brush stupid for liberals to brand all gun owners with the same brush when one of the kooks commits mass murder? That's what the left does when it screams "gun control" every time one of the few nutjobs starts shooting.

"There you go again"...with yet another broad-brush attack of your own.

You're assuming that we brand ALL gun owners with the same brush...when 32% of all Democrats ARE gun owners. As we have stated time and time AND TIME AGAIN, we aren't after the law-abiding gun owners - but we DO want to do what is necessary to keep the guns out of the hands of those who should not have them!

It's the gun-rights lobby that is ensuring the ease of access to guns by sexual predators, ex-felons, sociopaths, terrorists, and the like. The measures we want do NOT restrict the ability of law-abiding gun owners to own (almost) any gun they want or how many guns they want. The measures we want are for keeping them out the hands of those who should never have them to begin with.
 
Back
Top Bottom