Now what do you think are the chances this news item would be 100% fabricated? What about the Washington Times is it that creates instant doubt?
Actually I didn't say it was 100% fabricated. I believe the number. What I said in the part you quoted and elsewhere is the Moonie Times reported them out of context and that is true. I later crashed my browser by clicking on the link, but I did read the story.
Maybe the fact its a negative and good reason to find reason and stop illegal immigration, which the Democrats appear to need to stay in power.
Yes, it's all Democrats because the GOP has such an excellent record of dealing with illegals when they're in power!
What it proves is that a signifant percentage of illegals are criminals and/or criminally minded, something sociologists and criminologists have been saying for decades, you are importing crime. The very thought that criminals could be at the heart of Amerikan Liberal policy has to be quashed as it may turn public opinion against cheap labor for movie stars.
Movie stars? And Romney, and thousands of other employers, including the Donald, who was fined for employing illegals on one of his jobs.
This Liberal respects the hard work and determination immigrants make to become productive citizens. My country has the most liberal immigration laws in the world and we consider anyone who comes here illegally to BE a criminal and we treat them accordingly. You go directly to a converted army base now concentration camp and you stay there until you can raise the money to leave, or when her majesty's government gets around to busing you to the nearest American crossing and drop you off with nothing but the clothes on your back.
OK, we don't have those laws here, and it's because our employers love immigration, legal and otherwise, and we know this because no matter who is in charge of immigration, from Reagan to Bush to Clinton to Bush II to Obama, not one of them has actually made any attempt to really deal with the problem, and no Congress, democratic or republican, has done so either, except to try to pass more amnesty.
The American policy is an idiotic farce. While you encourage and abet 500,000 criminals and uneducated peasants to saunter in in the south, you make bright, educatyed doctors, scientists and tech workers wait months and jump through hoops.
All because the Democrats need Hispanic support. Pretty ****ed up way to run a country.
Yeah, it's all the the fault of Democrats. Another day, more partisan BS.
If you thought about it for a minute, what you might realize is doctors, for example, are kept waiting because the AMA wields a lot of power and its constituents are rich doctors, not hourly workers in a manual labor job, so their lobbyists are paid attention to in Congress and Congress limits those entries. No one gives a damn that low wage jobs are getting filled with low wage, illegal labor. That's the difference. The same thing is true for other professional jobs. Those folks have influence, and are friends of political writers and so those news outlets run stories about how Microsoft is importing all these foreigners who undercut domestic programmers, etc. and people listen. No one writes stories in the NYT or Washington Post about some carpenter who works for $10 an hour and used to make $15 before the illegals took over the building trade. No, in that case the people with clout are the builders and they're very happy to get skilled construction labor at a cheaper cost through hard working undocumented workers.
If you want to say Democrats are happy to have the growing Hispanic population on their side, of course. Every time some idiot like Steve King comes on TV and starts talking about Hispanics and their calves like cantaloupes from hauling pot across the border, a DNC angel gets its wings. But that's not what's driven immigration policy for the past 30 years or more.