• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Millionaires control 41% of world's wealth, expected to take more

Anomalism

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2013
Messages
3,237
Reaction score
2,159
Location
Florida
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
I'm sure the trickle down will start at any moment. ;)

Millionaires control 41% of world's wealth

Millionaires are expected to control nearly half of the world's personal wealth by 2019, according to a new study, suggesting that the wealth gap will continue to widen. The Global Wealth report from Boston Consulting Group (BCG) said the number of millionaires in the world grew to 17 million in 2014, up from 15 million in 2013. The world's millionaires now control 41 percent of the $164 trillion in global private wealth, up from 40 percent in 2013. The report said millionaires are expected to control 46 percent of the world's wealth in 2019.
 
I'm sure the trickle down will start at any moment. ;)

Millionaires control 41% of world's wealth

348750.jpg
 
I'm sure the trickle down will start at any moment. ;)

It's called employment. You make your first million then you start your own business employing other, etc, etc

BTW this is less likely to occur with a tax hungry government threatening your hard earned gains.
 
People who have more money have more of the money than people who have less money. Stunning news.
 
It's called employment. You make your first million then you start your own business employing other, etc, etc

BTW this is less likely to occur with a tax hungry government threatening your hard earned gains.

Yes, we all ought to be grateful to those benevolent aristocrats, giving us the chance to toil away so they can become even wealthier. We're all so lucky to have them lording over us, and we all ought to know our place and keep our heads down.
 
It's called employment. You make your first million then you start your own business employing other, etc, etc

BTW this is less likely to occur with a tax hungry government threatening your hard earned gains.
Well, the wife and I accumulated our first million in assets, but we aren't going to start a business. Instead, our assets will remain as they are, as simply owned property, and we will spend our retirement income having fun. So, I guess the tourist businesses will benefit.
 
Yes, we all ought to be grateful to those benevolent aristocrats, giving us the chance to toil away so they can become even wealthier. We're all so lucky to have them lording over us, and we all ought to know our place and keep our heads down.

No you tell them to **** themselves by starting your OWN business.
 
Well, the wife and I accumulated our first million in assets, but we aren't going to start a business. Instead, our assets will remain as they are, as simply owned property, and we will spend our retirement income having fun. So, I guess the tourist businesses will benefit.

Dang right! Others will start making their millions off people like y'all. ;)

[while the takers continue to bitch]
 
No you tell them to **** themselves by starting your OWN business.

We should all become rich; I'm sure that's economically sustainable.
 
No you tell them to **** themselves by starting your OWN business.
It's like you're channeling Marie Antoinette through a populist framing.
 
Did you know there was a time in which Republicans considered trickle down economics "voodoo" economics? Republicans really picked the wrong man in Reagan.

30 years later and 7 years into Obama's presidency and you're blaming Reagan ??

Lol !
 
30 years later and 7 years into Obama's presidency and you're blaming Reagan ??

Lol !

Blaming Reagan? For what? Lol. Reading comprehension, are you using it?
 
Back
Top Bottom