- Joined
- Oct 17, 2006
- Messages
- 59,366
- Reaction score
- 27,050
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Great, just keep repeating the same old busted argument, ignore where you've got it wrong, let that just drop away and then retailor your argument and mine. How dishonest.
Lmao - YOU posted the evidence that 6 months is how long the people have the make a case and then posted some exception hoping that we'd all ignore the fact that even AFTER 3 YEARS, the prosecution still didn't have a case. When you go down that line it's absolutely impossible to not see you as anything other than dishonest. You yourself agreed that 3 years does not fit a definition of REASONABLE and now you're sitting here telling us that we've been dishonest? Who are you trying to fool?
The fact of the matter is there is a speedy trial requirement written into the law. It lays a basic timeline of what constitutes a speedy trial and also informs of exceptions. MANY exceptions and events that legally stop the clock. Despite your assumption the prosecutor's actions delayed the trial, the law does not allow that except in very limited cases (none mentioned here). Are you seriously proposing his defense attorney filed no pre-trial motions. filed no motions at all (both are clock stoppers)?
It's obvious that you don't even understand the very links you keep arguing support your points:
On January 28, 2011, Browder’s two-hundred-and-fifty-eighth day in jail, he was brought back to the courthouse once again. This time, the prosecutor said, “The People are not ready. We are requesting one week.” The next court date set by the judge—March 9th—was not one week away but six. As it happened, Browder didn’t go to trial anytime that year. An index card in the court file explains:
June 23, 2011: People not ready, request 1 week.
August 24, 2011: People not ready, request 1 day.
November 4, 2011: People not ready, prosecutor on trial, request 2 weeks.
December 2, 2011: Prosecutor on trial, request January 3rd.
Continuing to claim that the prosecutors actions did not delay the trial is ABSOLUTE DISHONESTY at this point.
Considering the COL in NY and the fact these are foster parents running a foster home, $300 is doable for an emergency. But hey, no proof would be good enough for you. You desperately do not want your argument to be shown for what it is, broken.
So no evidence period? Good. Just conjecture. I figured.
Your rewriting and/or tortured reading of my posts which you reference shows you simply run away from clear language that you cannot rebut.
It's almost like you refuse to read anything which consistently refutes your statements.