- Joined
- Mar 2, 2013
- Messages
- 24,422
- Reaction score
- 8,266
- Location
- Northern New Jersey
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
warning that a ruling against subsidies would be a "twisted interpretation" of the law.
The only thing twisted in this story is him.
That's an example of how this guy thinks. Because the law doesn't say what he wants it to say, reading it as written is considered "twisted" to him. But twisting the law the way he wants it twisted is okay. Libs see nothing wrong with that.
Things are starting to get dangerous when our president can decide that a law doesn't really mean what it says, but means whatever he decides it means. Now, if he could enforce that, and he's getting closer, we are in big trouble. Oh, and not just one party, every single person in the country, though many don't realize it.