• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

In Baltimore schools, free meals for all

Coerced??? Where do you get that.? The women make the choices. They choose to give birth and then they choose to apply for welfare. THINK

"Permanently lose the ability to have children or we wont give you the help you need" is textbook coercion, yes.
 
Coerced??? Where do you get that.? The women make the choices. They choose to give birth

Pleased to see you support a woman's right to choose, though I somehow suspect that's not what you really meant.

and then they choose to apply for welfare. THINK

A woman has kids then falls ill, becomes disabled or loses her job. If she doesn't apply for welfare what the f*** else is she supposed to do?
 
Only the rich can reproduce? Sick and twisted.

Where did i say that??? Once again you have lied.

I do believe poor people should not have kids. That means the rich AND the middle class have kids. Makes perfect sense to everyone except a lib.

:lol: Her point was not that the rich can only have kids but obviously that you do not want the poor to have kids... Not surprising, you missed it.
 
This problem wouldn't exist if we told women. You want that welfare check, you have to accept sterilization. Still waiting for some lib to explain why that is a bad idea.

Ending poverty is easy.

Why are people still taking this poster seriously? DONT FEED THE TROLL PEOPLE.
 
Does forcing working people provide free meals for the kids of deadbeat parents help america?

Obviously yes... and in this case it is all kids that are given a free meal, not just poor ones. The strongest teams are where the best players (the rich) help the bad players (the poor) succeed and get better. LeBron could score 50 a game every game but he doesn't because he wants to win. Get it?
 
Where did i say that??? Once again you have lied.

I do believe poor people should not have kids. That means the rich AND the middle class have kids. Makes perfect sense to everyone except a lib.

If the poor stop having kids:

1) who is going to be your next scapegoat?

2) where are you going to get the military fodder to send out to die in your senseless wars?
 
A woman has kids then falls ill, becomes disabled or loses her job. If she doesn't apply for welfare what the f*** else is she supposed to do?

If you're living paycheck to paycheck, you shouldn't have kids. THINK
 
Obviously yes... and in this case it is all kids that are given a free meal, not just poor ones.

This is baltimore which means there are very few rich or middle class families. It's all welfare queens and their broods.
 
Last edited:
He used the word "coerced" and that is wrong. No one is being coerced into sterilization under my plan.

You say that but you are wrong because that is exactly what you said:

"You want that welfare check, you have to accept sterilization. " - You

=

coerce
verb co·erce \kō-ˈərs\
: to make (someone) do something by using force or threats
: to get (something) by using force or threats


Coerce | Definition of coerce by Merriam-Webster
 
If you're living paycheck to paycheck, you shouldn't have kids. THINK

If people are living paycheque to paycheque, your unjust society needs reforming. All full time work should pay a living wage, that allows you to start a family if you so wish.
 
If people are living paycheque to paycheque, your unjust society needs reforming. All full time work should pay a living wage, that allows you to start a family if you so wish.

Agreed...
 
He used the word "coerced" and that is wrong. No one is being coerced into sterilization under my plan.

Yes, they are. "Do this or we wont give you the help you need" is coercion.
 
Yes, they are. "Do this or we wont give you the help you need" is coercion.

They don't NEED the help. They spend their welfare money on good times when they should be feeding their kids with it.
 
They don't NEED the help. They spend their welfare money on good times when they should be feeding their kids with it.

You are judging large groups of people you know nothing about, and doing it badly.
 
Why are we giving these brats free breakfast.? Why can't their parents feed them a breakfast.? Parents should also pack a lunch for the kids.

Have you ever driven through Baltimore? It's one of the poorest cities in America. There are unfortunately many families who can't afford to feed their children breakfast. We spend trillions on wars of convenience and banker bailouts and you cry about feeding American children?

baltimore.jpg


Of course, you're probably white and come from privilege, so you have absolutely no idea what it's like as a child to not get to eat.
 
Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches are not that expensive.
 
In Los Angeles, they also provide dinners as well as year round meals. IMO this illustrates the Liberal/Progressive effort to turn parents into breading stock supplying future dependents of the state.

It used to be that even among the poorest families, they were still able to provide meals for their children. That is a commitment the state feels they should no longer trust to the carbon based units they tolerate as suppliers to their system.

progressive ? all children should be fed and it is either parents' or the goverment's responsibility(especially if you are a worldpower).not everything is about money or politics in this damned world.
 
Good for the kids whose parents can't afford lunch. Children don't have to pay for their parents poor decisions. And I've got question for the parents- how could you have a baby that you know from the outset you are not able to afford even the basic necessities such as food?
 
It is hard to believe a parent would let their kid go hungry. If they do call social services. It's not the governments job to arbitrarily provide breakfast for free at the tax payer expense.

Some people are poor, some kids go hungry. There is nothing wrong with including lunch and even breakfast as part of the standard cost of education. Why do you want kids to go hungry? We spend trillions blowing people up, I think we can afford some food for our kids.
 
Oh how easy it is to dismiss facts with the wave of a wand. What's next, call me a racist? :roll:

No, well if you make a racist argument then yes, but I haven't seen you do so yet, so no. You have made a hysterical argument though.
 
Back
Top Bottom