- Joined
- Oct 17, 2006
- Messages
- 59,298
- Reaction score
- 26,919
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
'%s' mean precisely nothing as they are 'polls'. But...the plus side...if you are right this would be made manifest by a landslide, and it would be put to bed forever.
Your hysterical rant in response is cute. In case you have missed it...I'm not invested in this. Couldnt give half a damn to be completely honest. I fully expect the Supreme Court to rule in favor of gay marriage and will be glad when it is done and over with and I only wish they had had the guts to take this on a decade ago.
So...thats a YES BTW...right? You WOULD expect the pro-gay marriage side to just completely accept the SCOTUS decision as final...even if it goes against them. Glad to see we are all on the same page.
The guy who doesn't care always seems to have a hypothetical gay marriage and gay marriage issues that he feels nobody has ever thought of (well, people have, they just find it absurd). Is that your shtick? This persona that doesn't really care about an issue but always seems to have some illogical hypothetical that tries but fails to get across its nonpoint? We get it. You feel that a constitutional amendment today has enough support because of laws passed on average 10 years ago when entire campaigns could be run on the gays coming to get you. The real world, however, has changed a bit in a decade even if your understanding of these issues hasn't. The reality is that I am so sure that SCOTUS will rule in favor of gay marriage advocates that I simply refuse to play your game of "what if?". It's not going to happen VanceMack, the right will lose on this issue and we'll get 50 years worth of whining about evil activist judges and how liberals are destroying society because da gays can get married. :shrug: