• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iran's leader rejects foreign access to military sites, scientists


Are you one of the eleven remaining Grubercrats in the US that still believes anything that lying SOS President Red-Line says?

And you really believe the Iranians will classify the entire nuke program 'peaceful/non-military' and allow inspections? Really? I mean really?

Iran has oil and gas deposits out the wazoo and it is much more cost effective to generate electricity from gas (especially since they already have that infrastructure in place) than develop nuke tech. Do you really expect rational people to believe the Iranians are spending that type of cash to develop nuke for purely peaceful purposes?

Oh, that's right, that lying SOS in WH told you so, so it has to be true.
 
Are you one of the eleven remaining Grubercrats in the US that still believes anything that lying SOS President Red-Line says?

And you really believe the Iranians will classify the entire nuke program 'peaceful/non-military' and allow inspections? Really? I mean really?

Iran has oil and gas deposits out the wazoo and it is much more cost effective to generate electricity from gas (especially since they already have that infrastructure in place) than develop nuke tech. Do you really expect rational people to believe the Iranians are spending that type of cash to develop nuke for purely peaceful purposes?

Oh, that's right, that lying SOS in WH told you so, so it has to be true.

I don't "believe" anything. I do know however that France, Germany, Russia, the UK and China are all working together to arrive at an acceptable agreement with Iran on this, and it's almost alarming that so many posters at DP are under the false notion that this is a unilateral Obama deal.
 
It's simple really, you have an expansionist regieme that's involved in EVERY regional conflict, that wishes to annex land, and expand it's power, and we want to trust them not to build nuclear weapons?

Well I think you are taking your eye off of the Main Thing here, which is, how else is Kerry supposed to get a Peace Prize and the Obama Administration to secure a legacy in the ME that doesn't reek of massive, universal failure?
 
Back
Top Bottom