• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit [W:439, 529, 978, 1489]

Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

You realize that depictions of Mohammed cartoon or otherwise carry the same punishment ( execution ) that being a Homosexual does.

Anyway, the real story is ISIS in the United States and their claim that this attack is just the first of many.

Yeah, I realise that. I also realise it's not a necessary form of free speech. But like I said, the morons coloured their cartoon, exercised their free speech and a guard has been shot for it, nice.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Lets see if you can follow this, although we already know that you can't:

I see you're still having trouble with this. OCD much?

Maybe you should take up your own advise of therapy.
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Do you have evidence the sharia courts there have executed anyone in modern times for apostasy? Do you have links of denied church applications to the ministry/government agency/whatever they do ?

Isn't apostasy like planking? I haven't read up lately but I seem to remember that.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

Yeah, I realise that. I also realise it's not a necessary form of free speech. But like I said, the morons coloured their cartoon, exercised their free speech and a guard has been shot for it, nice.

nice.. don't blame the violent extremists.. blame the people exercising their speech.

lefties are adorable that way. :roll:
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Μολὼν λαβέ;1064596011 said:
I see you're still having trouble with this. OCD much?

Maybe you should take up your own advise of therapy.

:lol: Do you fancy yourself relevant?

Run along...
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

nice.. don't blame the violent extremists.. blame the people exercising their speech.

lefties are adorable that way. :roll:

So do you walk up to little adults and call them ****ing midgets on a regular basis or is the whole, expressing free speech for anything, just a bunch of bull****?
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Hit a nerve because you can't read? :lol:

I didn't say that she is guilty of a crime. I said that she holds some blame.

If a person knowingly does something that they know, and has in the past, specifically been targeted with violence and they do it anyway then they are partially to blame.

You see common sense and responsiblity as delicate sensibilities and I see them as reasonable responses.

So she's partially to blame for the violence? Wow...

Blaming her for being even partially responsible for the violence is mutually exclusive with reasonable.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

You realize that depictions of Mohammed cartoon or otherwise carry the same punishment ( execution ) that being a Homosexual does.

Anyway, the real story is ISIS in the United States and their claim that this attack is just the first of many.

Greetings, Fenton. :2wave:

Will they claim that they have a right to freedom of speech, even if it's threat? Who gives them the right to do what they murder others for doing? This is not their country and they don't make the rules here - they are unwelcome visitors, IMO, and they should leave if things aren't to their liking here. We don't like bullies!
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Μολὼν λαβέ;1064596032 said:
So she's partially to blame for the violence? Wow...

Blaming her for being even partially responsible for the violence is mutually exclusive with reasonable.

I didn't say that she was partially responsible for the violence... but you continue to fail at reading little buddy. :lol:
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

Yeah, I realise that. I also realise it's not a necessary form of free speech. But like I said, the morons coloured their cartoon, exercised their free speech and a guard has been shot for it, nice.

So its the cartoonists fault the Muslims attempted to murder the guard?
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

Μολὼν λαβέ;1064596056 said:
So its the cartoonists fault the Muslims attempted to murder the guard?

:roll: No, it is simply stupid that they felt they needed to exercise "free speech" like they did. Do you purposely say offensive things to people just because you want to? No, because common decency acts as a barrier to being a rude asshole. Does this stupid lady or her group deserve blame for the violence? No... are they stupid ****ing morons that should have not been intentionally disrespectful assholes that knew that many Muslims would be very offended and that violence might occur? Hell ****ing yes. Only a complete dip**** would not understand this... (not calling you one just to be clear mods)
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

I didn't say that she was partially responsible for the violence... but you continue to fail at reading little buddy. :lol:

Another idiotic response...

You wrote this:

If a person knowingly does something that they know, and has in the past, specifically been targeted with violence and they do it anyway then they are partially to blame.

Partially to blame? Blame for what? What happened that she should be blamed for? Didn't violence occur? So what is she to blame for if not that?

I anticipate another deflection.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

A security guard was injured. This could have been far worse than it was. Anyway, yeah, in this forum, it is for me to say that just because I have a right to call you an asshole as an expression of free speech (besides being a violation of board rules) it's not expedient. I'm an atheist but I wouldn't gratuitously offend a Christian or a Muslim. This was senseless and didn't end well. But hey, the kiddos with their crayons exercised their free speech, yippee!
On the one hand, I would tend to agree that the focus of the meeting/conference was kinda...childish.

But the 1st A protects the right of everyone to speak freely....except in specific circumstances, such as "shouting fire in a crowded theater".
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

:roll: No, it is simply stupid that they felt they needed to exercise "free speech" like they did. Do you purposely say offensive things to people just because you want to? No, because common decency acts as a barrier to being a rude asshole. Does this stupid lady or her group deserve blame for the violence? No... are they stupid ****ing morons that should have not been intentionally disrespectful assholes that knew that many Muslims would be very offended and that violence might occur? Hell ****ing yes. Only a complete dip**** would not understand this... (not calling you one just to be clear mods)

Found your white flag.

:surrender
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Μολὼν λαβέ;1064596086 said:
Another idiotic response...

You wrote this:



Partially to blame? Blame for what? What happened that she should be blamed for? Didn't violence occur? So what is she to blame for if not that?

I anticipate another deflection.

Answered in post #661 right above this... though your failure to be able to read will hinder your comprehension.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

Μολὼν λαβέ;1064596109 said:
Found your white flag.

:surrender

ummm... what? :lol: I thought that inability to read would lead to comprehension problems and it turns out I was spot on. :lol:

Whatever little buddy... you rage away.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439]

Yes, both of these muslim scum....just joined ISIS!

How do we know that? Did they have the membership card and secret decoder ring? Did they pass the ISIS test and pay the annual membership fee? Can we double check this claim by looking on the official ISIS roster?

Seriously, it seems to me that anyone can "join" ISIS by just saying they joined. I don't think that ISIS does a background check or anything. And ISIS can claim responsibility or they can claim to not be responsible for any particular act anywhere in the world.

Joining ISIS means nothing except that someone is a muslim extremist, unless one is actually physically going to territory that ISIS holds or is attempting to hold.

I was thinking about joining the Legion of Doom, at least those guys have superpowers. Either that, or I am going to sign up with Dr. Evil and his quest to take over the world.
 
Last edited:
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

Two shot dead outside Muhammad Art Exhibit in Garland

This was at a facility in Garland, Texas, near Dallas.

I gather this was an exhibit of artwork that depicts Muhammad, a la Charlie Hebdo, in defiance of radical Muslims and in affirmation of freedom of speech.

Two guys drove up armed with guns and explosives, opened fire, and were killed straight away by return fire.

It's a bad idea to go gunning for any group of Texans without a lot of firepower.

two alleged jihadists with "assault weapons"

One Texas Traffic cop with a 45 pistol

no contest

Cop 2, ISIS douchebags zero
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

How obtuse can you be?

People are claiming that criticizing this bigoted cartoon festival is somehow off base because of the First Amendment. The shooting is a completely unrelated issue.
I'm checking, hold on. Nope, the thread title here is specifically about the shooting
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

I didn't say that she is guilty of a crime. I said that she holds some blame. Learn to read.
Just like the rape victim who wore the shirt skirt apparently.
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

On the one hand, I would tend to agree that the focus of the meeting/conference was kinda...childish.

But the 1st A protects the right of everyone to speak freely....except in specific circumstances, such as "shouting fire in a crowded theater".

Well Mark, who has suggested that they didn't have a first amendment right to be childish??
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

I'd like to be there when you suggested that to the security guards family, lol.

He's a hero and his family should be proud
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas [W:439, 529]

You realize that depictions of Mohammed cartoon or otherwise carry the same punishment ( execution ) that being a Homosexual does.

Anyway, the real story is ISIS in the United States and their claim that this attack is just the first of many.

I'm sure the liberal response after those attacks will be that we deserve it
 
Re: Shooting at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

Just like the rape victim who wore the shirt skirt apparently.

The two aren't even remotely analogous... Why did you even bother?
 
Re: Two Shot at Muhammad Art Exhibit in Texas

I'm checking, hold on. Nope, the thread title here is specifically about the shooting
He's saying that the argument about criticizing the cartoon festival being off base because 1st A is an unrelated argument to the shooting.

Just because they got shot at doesn't mean they were right to do what they did.

Basically.
 
Back
Top Bottom