Re: Prisoner in van said Freddie Gray was ‘trying to injure himself,’ document says
idk if anyone has asked yet, but I am curious about how I could distinguish between the sounds of general banging about and the sounds of someone trying to injure themselves.
While it is possible to discern in various environments, we do not known how he said he knew, or even if he did say how he knew.
But now that it appears that he isn't going to admit to saying anything, as such, we may never know.
So what we are left with is that he said it when there was no reason to doubt his statements, versus his denial now which has no credibility.
Mustachio;1064594450 said:
I brought that up ages ago, but luckily Excon pointed out that my thoughts were irrelevant and he had won whilst I had lost.
Still being dishonest I see. :doh
No, that is not what happened.
What I have said is that it is the evidence we have to work with.
And the win lose thing is all yours.
Gonzo Rodeo;1064594163 said:
You are ignoring that this is what the officer says Allen says happened, not what Allen says happened.
You keep getting told yet refuse to understand.
So all you do is necessitate the repeating of what you are ignoring.
His
(the witness's) statement was included in the request for the warrant.
Gonzo Rodeo;1064594163 said:
When asked to corroborate, Allen refuted the statement.
Why you don't pay attention and keep arguing in circles will never be known.
This is still you ignoring that what he says now has no credibility.
He claims to have not said it in the first place.
And again.
He had no cause to lie to the authorities and nothing provided shows that.
His current statements do show a reason to lie. He himself voiced it.
Or are you unable to distinguish the difference between the two being made under different circumstances?
Unless what he says matches, nothing he changed is credible. Do you really not understand that?
Some piece of paper claims he said it.
A piece of paper he didn't write.
He was interviewed by investigators and gave a statement.
The application for the search warrant included
his statement.
Besides the previous information about the investigators finding the knife was in violation of the law, we now have one of the Officers trying to force the SA's hand.
BALTIMORE (AP) — One of the Baltimore police officers who arrested Freddie Gray wants the police department and prosecutor to produce a knife that was the reason for the arrest, saying in court papers that it is an illegal weapon.
The city's top prosecutor, Marilyn Mosby, said Friday in charging the officer and five others that the knife was legal under Maryland law, meaning they had arrested Gray illegally.
The motion was filed Monday by attorneys for Officer Edward Nero in Baltimore District Court.
Officer charged in Gray death contends arrest was legal