• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT......

No but you're an Obama man, though and through, a socialist to the core.

Haha. It must be nice to live in fantasyland and invent one's foes.

You won't "get" this because you refuse, not because the evidence is overwhelming.

The evidence of what? Some kids in Russia got the receptionist's phone log. The only evidence that produces is regarding who is a hack.

If your not a liberal show me one post where you have criticized liberal policy.

I don't need to prove anything to you. I really don't care if you spend the rest of your life swinging madly at strawmen. To the windmills, Don; strike hard.
 
Too many CT leaps for me. Nonetheless, I hold Benghazi against her.

Well the IG is conducting the Investigation of the 6 billion lost at State.....so there is No CT there. Plus they already have shown Hillary and her team were incompetent. So No CT there either.

Oh she screwed up with more than Benghazi.....It was all of Libya. No CT There either.
 
Yes. US citizens, foreign nationals, foreign organizations etc can make a FOIA request. Shouldn't you know this? Didn't you work as a "journalist"? Didn't you work at some respectable journalistic outfit? Here, inform yourself:

OASCR, Frequently Asked Questions - Freedom of Information Act





What part of 'unclassified' do you have trouble with? :)



What part of spying don't you?

So the White House that said "you can keep your plan' admits months after the fact they were hacked but "no classified" documents were involved.

What part of honesty do you have a problem with? What part of incompetence do you not have a problem with.

FFS, the White House was hacked, Hillary was hacked and there's evidence a cover up is on going and all you liberals can whine about is "vast right wing conspiracies" and how they are picking on your poor, black president.

Wake the **** up.

You guys won't bother locking the barn doors until all the cattle have been stolen
 
That's alright several understood you can't figure out what an Ambassador or a diplomat is. Nor the part about getting others email accounts. But you can try and fake like you don't understand. I won't mind.

Either I understood, or I didn't. It can't be both. Get your narrative straight. In either case, the e-mails were unclassified and they stole a rolodex. That's pretty terrible "hacking" work, hardly anything to get concerned about. :shrug:

Also, you can validate that anyone else's email account they have doesn't have anything sensitive they were talking about, Right?

This is the important part:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/26/u...obamas-unclassified-emails-officials-say.html

White House officials said that no classified networks had been compromised, and that the hackers had collected no classified information. Many senior officials have two computers in their offices, one operating on a highly secure classified network and another connected to the outside world for unclassified communications.

They got unclassified information, and they got a rolodex. I'm sure our national security is shaking in its booties.
 
Haha. It must be nice to live in fantasyland and invent one's foes.



The evidence of what? Some kids in Russia got the receptionist's phone log. The only evidence that produces is regarding who is a hack.



I don't need to prove anything to you. I really don't care if you spend the rest of your life swinging madly at strawmen. To the windmills, Don; strike hard.

Insults. Whenever a liberal loses a debate, they insult

YOU made the ludicrous claim you are not a liberal. Refusing to back it up offering cheap insulting language only proves I was right, and you lie

You can do better
 
What part of honesty do you have a problem with? What part of incompetence do you not have a problem with.

FFS, the White House was hacked, Hillary was hacked and there's evidence a cover up is on going and all you liberals can whine about is "vast right wing conspiracies" and how they are picking on your poor, black president.

Wake the **** up.

You guys won't bother locking the barn doors until all the cattle have been stolen

Yous heards 'm! Wake up white people!
 
If one believes the US President is giving the Iranian regime drone tech directly and openly though the physical giving of a drone, then one will believe anything.

The Obama administration lied....AGAIN....when that drone went down.

They said it was destroyed. Well Iran disagreed.

The people that would believe anything are responsible for putting this corrupt incompetencent in office and probably still believe that that drone was destroyed and the Iranians are pulling our leg.

When do Profound Foreign Policy mishaps stop being mishaps ?

Obama's backing the Muslim Brotherhood to his destabilizing the Middle east by enabling the spread of Islamo-facism, one thing is clear.

He's always erred on the side of Islamic extremism. They are repeatedly the recipients of the fruits of his Foreign Policy disasters.
 
Yous heards 'm! Wake up white people!



English isn't your first language is it?

You are such an Amerikan liberal, right down to the sniveling drive-by cheap shots in posts that don't even involve you.

Where I come from we call that trolling, or bating.
 
The Obama administration lied....AGAIN....when that drone went down.

They said it was destroyed. Well Iran disagreed.

And you believe Iran. Brace for irony...

The people that would believe anything are responsible for putting this corrupt incompetencent in office and probably still believe that that drone was destroyed and the Iranians are pulling our leg.

Why do you believe the Iranian regime? Do you also ascribe to their claims regarding republican presidents?

When do Profound Foreign Policy mishaps stop being mishaps ?

Obama's backing the Muslim Brotherhood to his destabilizing the Middle east by enabling the spread of Islamo-facism, one thing is clear.

He's always erred on the side of Islamic extremism. They are repeatedly the recipients of the fruits of his Foreign Policy disasters.

hahaha
 
The president has a right to communicate "off the clock" and not in official manner, just like everyone else, and he has a right to have this unofficial communication hacked like everyone else

This doesn't even qualify as a scandal
 
Either I understood, or I didn't. It can't be both. Get your narrative straight. In either case, the e-mails were unclassified and they stole a rolodex. That's pretty terrible "hacking" work, hardly anything to get concerned about. :shrug:



This is the important part:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/26/u...obamas-unclassified-emails-officials-say.html



They got unclassified information, and they got a rolodex. I'm sure our national security is shaking in its booties.


You're are the one that says you can't understand things when many others sure got the point. Like I said, I don't mind what you show others about how you think.

Here was the more Important Part that you couldn't fathom nor comprehend. That you deliberately missed or weren't able to make the leap with.




The hackers, who also got into the State Department's unclassified system, obtained access to the email archives of people inside the White House, and perhaps some outside, with whom Obama regularly communicated, the Times said.

However the incursion was "far more intrusive and worrisome" than publicly acknowledged, the newspaper said, citing senior American officials briefed on the investigation, and saying the hackers were presumed to be linked to -- or even working for -- Moscow.

"It's the Russian angle to this that's particularly worrisome," a senior official was quoted as saying......snip~

Russian hackers read Obama emails: report


Looks like its just BO peep and the lost sheep are shaking. Maybe you should explain this to them how it means nothing. Calm them down a lil. Give them a security blanket so to speak. :lol:
 
What part of spying don't you?

So the White House that said "you can keep your plan' admits months after the fact they were hacked but "no classified" documents were involved.

What part of honesty do you have a problem with? What part of incompetence do you not have a problem with.

FFS, the White House was hacked, Hillary was hacked and there's evidence a cover up is on going and all you liberals can whine about is "vast right wing conspiracies" and how they are picking on your poor, black president.

Wake the **** up.

You guys won't bother locking the barn doors until all the cattle have been stolen

So now that you were caught with your pants down about FOIA requests, you try to avoid the fact by switching to a rant. Okay! Yes, Fear&Loathing, guy who claims to be a journalist, FOREIGN NATIONALS CAN MAKE FOIA REQUESTS. You should know that, being a journalist in Canada and all or did you only work for a US outfit? In any case, it doesn't excuse not knowing the ins and outs of a form that you'd fill out often.

Anyways, nobody needs to wake up because a bunch of script kiddies got unclassified information and a rolodex. It's about as low on the totem pole of 'hacking' as you can possibly get. Hell, Petraeus released far more sensitive information and he only got a slap on the wrist. Pretending that this is the scandal you wish it were just makes you seems slightly obsessed with trying to attack Obama.

In any case, I don't have time to be running around the forum screaming about the magnitude of this scandal. It simply isn't that big of an issue. :shrug:
 
You're are the one that says you can't understand things when many others sure got the point. Like I said, I don't mind what you show others about how you think.

I said I didn't understand something? Nope. I said that they stole a rolodex and unclassified information. Big deal. It simply isn't the scandal you're making it out to be. That remains true. :shrug:
 
You get lamer and lamer?

Is there something you wish to contribute to the debate, or just keep on baiting?

Why don't you stop crying like a little girl and leave the moderating to those assigned the task.
 
So now that you were caught with your pants down about FOIA requests, you try to avoid the fact by switching to a rant. Okay! Yes, Fear&Loathing, guy who claims to be a journalist, FOREIGN NATIONALS CAN MAKE FOIA REQUESTS. You should know that, being a journalist in Canada and all or did you only work for a US outfit? In any case, it doesn't excuse not knowing the ins and outs of a form that you'd fill out often.

Anyways, nobody needs to wake up because a bunch of script kiddies got unclassified information and a rolodex. It's about as low on the totem pole of 'hacking' as you can possibly get. Hell, Petraeus released far more sensitive information and he only got a slap on the wrist. Pretending that this is the scandal you wish it were just makes you seems slightly obsessed with trying to attack Obama.

In any case, I don't have time to be running around the forum screaming about the magnitude of this scandal. It simply isn't that big of an issue. :shrug:



Okay since you were caught with not knowing what an Ambassador or a Diplomat is. Or why Team BO still says sensitive information. Do you think we can move onto those other email accounts they got?

Do you think it is worrisome that they got other peoples email accounts that work in the WH and Outside of the WH. When did you think this means nothing with people who work in government?
 
I said I didn't understand something? Nope. I said that they stole a rolodex and unclassified information. Big deal. It simply isn't the scandal you're making it out to be. That remains true. :shrug:

No once again you just can't get it Right.....its not me making it into a scandal. Talk to the NY Times, Reuters, and the AP. Those meanies are causing all the trouble.

Evidently they thought it was worth mentioning since the WH was hacked less than 30 days ago.
 
No once again you just can't get it Right.....its not me making it into a scandal. Talk to the NY Times, Reuters, and the AP. Those meanies are causing all the trouble.

Evidently they thought it was worth mentioning since the WH was hacked less than 30 days ago.

The contention is not with the news, it's with your analysis.
 
The Obama administration lied....AGAIN....when that drone went down.

They said it was destroyed. Well Iran disagreed.

The people that would believe anything are responsible for putting this corrupt incompetencent in office and probably still believe that that drone was destroyed and the Iranians are pulling our leg.

When do Profound Foreign Policy mishaps stop being mishaps ?

Obama's backing the Muslim Brotherhood to his destabilizing the Middle east by enabling the spread of Islamo-facism, one thing is clear.

He's always erred on the side of Islamic extremism. They are repeatedly the recipients of the fruits of his Foreign Policy disasters.


Do you think the Supporters of the Team BO can figure out this has been going on for almost a year, but Team BO was trying to play like, The Sounds of Silence. :lol:

Maybe he thinks silence is part of transparency. :mrgreen:
 
Okay since you were caught with not knowing what an Ambassador or a Diplomat is.

Continuing to repeat this won't make it so. You seem to do this when you have no argument. Claim that people don't know this or that.

Or why Team BO still says sensitive information. Do you think we can move onto those other email accounts they got?

What about them? They got the e-mail accounts of ambassadors and diplomats? Oh no! What are they going to do? Send them ads for cheap Russian brides? Offer them a real estate deal in Crimea? Try and 'hack' into classified e-mail servers as conspicuously as they did here? Your CT leads nowhere. It's simply not the issue you're trying to make it out to be.

Do you think it is worrisome that they got other peoples email accounts that work in the WH and Outside of the WH. When did you think this means nothing with people who work in government?

Not really. They got unclassified information and they got e-mail addresses. Can you tell us what they'll do with those e-mail addresses? Can you tell us what they can do? Send them a keylogger? :lol:
 
The contention is not with the news, it's with your analysis.

Did Blumenthal's Email get Hacked by a Romanian Hacker leading him to Hillarys Email and her server?

Did He get State Dept Emails and others Email accounts?

Did The WH get hacked thru the State Depts Computers?


Which is false or not true,? again?
 
Did Blumenthal's Email get Hacked by a Romanian Hacker leading him to Hillarys Email and her server?

Did He get State Dept Emails and others Email accounts?

Did The WH get hacked thru the State Depts Computers?


Which is false or not true,? again?

You've completely abandoned the topic.
 
Continuing to repeat this won't make it so. You seem to do this when you have no argument. Claim that people don't know this or that.



What about them? They got the e-mail accounts of ambassadors and diplomats? Oh no! What are they going to do? Send them ads for cheap Russian brides? Offer them a real estate deal in Crimea? Try and 'hack' into classified e-mail servers as conspicuously as they did here? Your CT leads nowhere. It's simply not the issue you're trying to make it out to be.



Not really. They got unclassified information and they got e-mail addresses. Can you tell us what they'll do with those e-mail addresses? Can you tell us what they can do? Send them a keylogger? :lol:



Well you are the one that deliberately ignored the part about the Ambassador and Diplomats.

What about them? They got the e-mail accounts of ambassadors and diplomats? Oh no! What are they going to do? Send them ads for cheap Russian brides? Offer them a real estate deal in Crimea? Try and 'hack' into classified e-mail servers as conspicuously as they did here? Your CT leads nowhere. It's simply not the issue you're trying to make it out to be.


Oh noes......they can just get any other email account from whom they have and talk to. But lets see, your so called uhm, "smart power" :roll: attempts to downplay this. Yeah that's really showing us, huh? :lamo

Have you figured out that employees from Other governments can be referred to as Diplomats.....yet? :mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
The contention is not with the news, it's with your analysis.

He doesn't see it. He genuinely thinks Reuters is making this into a scandal. It isn't. It reported on something that happened. It is he who is making it seem bigger than it actually is. These were unclassified e-mails. A FOIA request would have achieved 50% of what they did. The ambassador/diplomat addresses? What are they going to do with them? Send them Nigerian prince phishing scams?
 
Back
Top Bottom