• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent [W:437]

Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

False. In 1714, Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the mercury thermometer, which is still used today to accurately measuring temperature.

Thanks for proving how right wingers don't know anything about science :)

your showing of lack of science is glaring.. so all were the same and all had the same "control" and variables.... as we see the "change" is so minute its within tolerance of the lack of controls and application..

You have nothing but carrying of Obamas water here.. your posts a garbage

how hot was it before the dinosaurs creates global warming?
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

We are--that's why we point out the ignorance of the conservative posters on science,

instead of stupidly trying to score smartie points, which is apparently what the OP did since he tried to talk about an issue he cannot even define in his own words.

Al Gore is a shill running a fraud..and you bought it...LOL LOL LOL LOL
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

Lol ok, so what you're saying is that even an institution that hates liberals thinks AGW is real. Why can't you get on board with that???

Even so, what does it matter if they hate liberals or conservatives? Climate change is a scientific ssue, not a political one.

That's what makes it a liberal issue, because conservatives do not know or care for science--that's been well-documented.
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

I wish you were right. Liberals have taken up AGW as a cause. That cause is rooted not in scientific fact, but in belief that man and the internal combustion engine.are ruining the climate. Liberalism is attached to a political philosophy and belief is attached to religion so AGW has become politics, religion and science. Every externality is practiced by different individuals based on their position in society. Scientists are involved in the science of AGW, politicians are involved in taxes and the money associated with AGW and laymen are generally involved in the religious aspects of AGW. AGW may or may not be proved as a valid theory. Skeptics are willing to wait until science proves itself one way or the other. Believers found their beliefs on Pascal's Wager.

Except the cause is rooted in scientific fact.

Facts don't change, regardless of whether I'm conservative or liberal. What is political is the way that we approach and tackle these facts. That is where the dispute comes in. There is no one correct way to handle climate change. Scientists cannot predict the effect of human technology in the future, or of human response in the present.

That AGW is happening is clear cut. The ways we should deal with it is not.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Evidence

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2014/sep/23/10-fact-checks-about-climate-change/
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

Al Gore is a shill running a fraud

Really, explain to us exactly what Gore said about climate change that was fraudulent--explain it to us.
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

Before you start frothing and foaming, explain to us, in your own words, what the global warming issue is all about.
I will give it a try!
Starting in the late 80's Scientist like Dr James Hanson starting predicting that the accepted
physics response to adding CO2 would be amplified through a collection of open loop feedbacks
to create catastrophic warming. While the direct response to doubling the CO2 level is generally
accepted, the amplified feedback is not, and have not been verified through the observed data.
The predictions went along ok, until 1998 when the observed data and the models sharply deviated.
Nature has a good article on the measurements.
Climate change: The case of the missing heat : Nature News & Comment
Stark contrast

On a chart of global atmospheric temperatures, the hiatus stands in stark contrast to the rapid warming of the two decades that preceded it. Simulations conducted in advance of the 2013–14 assessment from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) suggest that the warming should have continued at an average rate of 0.21 °C per decade from 1998 to 2012. Instead, the observed warming during that period was just 0.04 °C per decade, as measured by the UK Met Office in Exeter and the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, UK.
The models predicted a continuation of the 0.21 °C per decade, while the actual data only showed
.04  °C per decade.
There has been much speculation of where the "missing" heat went, it is possible that the
predicted amplification simply does not exist at the predicted levels.
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

It's a good job then that AGW has nothing to do with liberalism and everything to do with science.

As far as I'm concerned, scientists have a far better track record of not pulling stuff out of their asses than either liberal or conservative politicians.

It does ?

When the NOAA manipulated temperature data so they could claim that July 2012 was the hottest month on record that wasn't Science, it was fraud.

Global warming existing only in Computer models built on " Homogenized data " isnt Science either.

If the left sincerely cared about the Climate and the integrity of the Science thats used to try and understand it they would completely disconnect from the issue.

They're inclusion and outspoken representation has done more harm to the credibility of Climate research than any amount of opposition from people who thinks AGW is a scam.

Same with Alternative and renwable energy. Its been corrupted by a ideology that puts more value On Intent than they do results.

As a technology it can never be objectively valued as a viable alternative to Fossil fuels because the people who push it shout down any criticism based on a Political position and not on the quality and or feasibility of the product.

Because of that we wind up with debacles like Germanys Green revolution.
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

Really, explain to us exactly what Gore said about climate change that was fraudulent--explain it to us.

all of it.. its complete nonsense....its wealth redistribution and giving control to the UN..

only a fool believes this canard..
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

Except the cause is rooted in scientific fact.

Facts don't change, regardless of whether I'm conservative or liberal. What is political is the way that we approach and tackle these facts. That is where the dispute comes in. There is no one correct way to handle climate change. Scientists cannot predict the effect of human technology in the future, or of human response in the present.

That AGW is happening is clear cut. The ways we should deal with it is not.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Evidence

10 fact-checks about climate change | PolitiFact

I LOL when you use "fact"
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

It does ?

When the NOAA manipulated temperature data so they could claim that July 2012 was the hottest month on record that wasn't Science, it was fraud.

Global warming existing only in Computer models built on " Homogenized data " isnt Science either.

If the left sincerely cared about the Climate and the integrity of the Science thats used to try and understand it they would completely disconnect from the issue.

They're inclusion and outspoken representation has done more harm to the credibility of Climate research than any amount of opposition from people who thinks AGW is a scam.

Same with Alternative and renwable energy. Its been corrupted by a ideology that puts more value On Intent than they do results.

As a technology it can never be objectively valued as a viable alternative to Fossil fuels because the people who push it shout down any criticism based on a Political position and not on the quality and or feasibility of the product.

Because of that we wind up with debacles like Germanys Green revolution.

Temperature data is not the only indicator of climate change. Irregardless, most of the claims about temperature manipulation are baseless.

As for renewable energy, that comes down to the solutions to climate change, which as I have said before, is not clear cut. I'm glad you brought it up though, because this is the discussion we should be having: 'What is the best way to deal with AGW?' instead of 'Is AGW real?'. Personally, I'm a large proponent of using nuclear energy as a replacement for renewables. Far more reliable with fewer intermittency issues.
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

That's what makes it a liberal issue, because conservatives do not know or care for science--that's been well-documented.

so another lie you trying to run is "no scientists" are GOP?....LOL
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

We are--that's why we point out the ignorance of the conservative posters on science,

It seems you really can't help yourself

instead of stupidly trying to score smartie points, which is apparently what the OP did since he tried to talk about an issue he cannot even define in his own words.
You aren't really interested in whether AGW is a reality or not its just an excuse to indulge another tedious US centric political points scoring exercise :roll:
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

I LOL when you use "fact"

I LOL when the only argument you've put forward in this thread is 'NASA hates liberals'. As if it were somehow even relevant (or true) :roll:
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

Temperature data is not the only indicator of climate change. Irregardless, most of the claims about temperature manipulation are baseless.

As for renewable energy, that comes down to the solutions to climate change, which as I have said before, is not clear cut. I'm glad you brought it up though, because this is the discussion we should be having: 'What is the best way to deal with AGW?' instead of 'Is AGW real?'. Personally, I'm a large proponent of using nuclear energy as a replacement for renewables. Far more reliable with fewer intermittency issues.


Your posts are liberal agenda on full display... is AGW real?...LOL... who cares... man can not control it.. you may want to consult with the dinosaurs and the sun
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

Except the cause is rooted in scientific fact.

Facts don't change, regardless of whether I'm conservative or liberal. What is political is the way that we approach and tackle these facts. That is where the dispute comes in. There is no one correct way to handle climate change. Scientists cannot predict the effect of human technology in the future, or of human response in the present.

That AGW is happening is clear cut. The ways we should deal with it is not.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Evidence

10 fact-checks about climate change | PolitiFact

The problem is that the facts aren't being accurately reported and 100% of the predictions and forecasting have been wrong. What is clear is that the planet is always heating or cooling. The only people who are wrong about climate are the ones that believe it will be or should be unchanging. With respect to mankind impact, it's doubtful that ten or twenty parts per million of C02 added to the atmosphere has as much impact as water vapor in the first twenty feet, cloud cover, the sun's radiation, the orbit of the earth around the sun and one of dozens of variables impacting climate.


Nasa by the way was just busted fudging it's numbers to fit the narrative. So did NOAA. Politifact is a liberal website run by the St. Pete Times, a left leaning paper.
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

I LOL when the only argument you've put forward in this thread is 'NASA hates liberals'. As if it were somehow even relevant (or true) :roll:

is true. it stems with Obama relying on Russia ...and the non funding ...

they hate Obama
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

The problem is that the facts aren't being accurately reported and 100% of the predictions and forecasting have been wrong. What is clear is that the planet is always heating or cooling. The only people who are wrong about climate are the ones that believe it will be or should be unchanging. With respect to mankind impact, it's doubtful that ten or twenty parts per million of C02 added to the atmosphere has as much impact as water vapor in the first twenty feet, cloud cover, the sun's radiation, the orbit of the earth around the sun and one of dozens of variables impacting climate.


Nasa by the way was just busted fudging it's numbers to fit the narrative. So did NOAA. Politifact is a liberal website run by the St. Pete Times, a left leaning paper.

Great post.. spot on..
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

I will give it a try!
Starting in the late 80's Scientist like Dr James Hanson starting predicting that the accepted
physics response to adding CO2 would be amplified through a collection of open loop feedbacks
to create catastrophic warming. While the direct response to doubling the CO2 level is generally
accepted, the amplified feedback is not, and have not been verified through the observed data.
The predictions went along ok, until 1998 when the observed data and the models sharply deviated.
Nature has a good article on the measurements.
Climate change: The case of the missing heat : Nature News & Comment

The models predicted a continuation of the 0.21 °C per decade, while the actual data only showed
.04  °C per decade.
There has been much speculation of where the "missing" heat went, it is possible that the
predicted amplification simply does not exist at the predicted levels.

All that article says is that the models used to predict the average temperate of the Earth's atmosphere are incomplete.

What does that have to do w/the global warming issue? Explain.
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

all of it.. its complete nonsense....its wealth redistribution

Cite, where is the evidence? Explain.

Good 'ol travis--continually proving the case for right-wingers' lack of facts. :)
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

I LOL when you use "fact"

You don't know anything about facts, because whenever we ask you to cite them to back up your rants, you never have any.
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

Cite, where is the evidence? Explain.

Good 'ol travis--continually proving the case for right-wingers' lack of facts. :)

that you are so ignorant on this subject is on full display.. again Global Warming is a FARCE.. its wealth redistribution..

that your so gullible is comical.. what next?... that Michelle's School lunch program cured cancer?
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

Yes, it's obvious the debate rages on and the models and predictions require constant modifications.

With that as fact, it also remains true the only solution being pushed involves the largest transfer of wealth in the history of mankind, every human being on the planet change their lives, and a tacit agreement by all mankind to be subservient to a panel of unknown experts who will decide how they get to live life moving forward.

It's preposterous to believe such a scenario would not be met without extreme skepticism and resistance. Calling these billions who are skeptical names does nothing to forward the AGW agenda.

Exactly, it is a major step in the right direction that many in the cult of AGW have even started admitting that the science is not, in fact, settled.
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

Temperature data is not the only indicator of climate change. Irregardless, most of the claims about temperature manipulation are baseless.

As for renewable energy, that comes down to the solutions to climate change, which as I have said before, is not clear cut. I'm glad you brought it up though, because this is the discussion we should be having: 'What is the best way to deal with AGW?' instead of 'Is AGW real?'. Personally, I'm a large proponent of using nuclear energy as a replacement for renewables. Far more reliable with fewer intermittency issues.

Wrong,

In 2012 the NOAA made the claim that July 2012 was the hottest month on record surpassing July 1936 as the previous hottest month on record.

They made these claims via a arbitrary and unscientific process called " homogenatation " that for some reason always shows warming regardless of the actual temperature data.

When challenged ( exposed ) by a outside Scientist that showed they had in fact manipulated temperature data they had to rescind their claim.

In 2014 the NOAA posted a revised graph thar showed July 1936 to again, be the hottest month on record.

Recently the Australian Meteorology Bureau also got busted manipulating temperature data.

There's nothing Scientific about adjusting data to arrive at a predetermined conclusion. Thats just fraud.
 
Last edited:
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

You don't know anything about facts, because whenever we ask you to cite them to back up your rants, you never have any.

again.. all "facts" have been wrong.. and now have been debunked..like your posts!!!

so you tell me which dinosaur you blame for the ice age? was the T Rex the most C02 emitting?
 
Re: Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are

Exactly, it is a major step in the right direction that many in the cult of AGW have even started admitting that the science is not, in fact, settled.

No.. Solletica and Nilly have "facts"....LOL...Obama sent them their facts and those and the facts..LOL
 
Back
Top Bottom