• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chris Christie vows to 'crack down' on marijuana as president

Funny, he actually made statements to the media stating he would tell fed. agencies not to prosecute.

No ****. He kinda didnt have a choice after congress (both parties) forced him to. :lamo

The depths you will go to.....
 
No ****. He kinda didnt have a choice after congress (both parties) forced him to. :lamo

The depths you will go to.....

Sorry, you are wrong. I live in a state where we examined his words, for years, very closely because when he initially started weakening on his stance, our governor at the time still wouldnt allow it because she couldnt guarantee the safety (legally) of state employees that were involved.

The depths Obama-haters will go to, heaven forbid he doesnt live down to their expectations!
 
Sorry, you are wrong. I live in a state where we examined his words, for years, very closely because when he initially started weakening on his stance, our governor at the time still wouldnt allow it because she couldnt guarantee the safety (legally) of state employees that were involved.

The depths Obama-haters will go to, heaven forbid he doesnt live down to their expectations!
Awesome...your anecdote CLEARLY is more relevant than the article posted citing congressional action restricting the ability of the Obama Justice Department to attack legal dispensaries. :roll:
 
Awesome...your anecdote CLEARLY is more relevant than the article posted citing congressional action restricting the ability of the Obama Justice Department to attack legal dispensaries. :roll:

Yeah, sorry that all the press conferences werent preserved for your approval, LOLOLOL.
 
Until we adopts the "shoot on site" policy for drug use it will never, never, never change.

Are you advocating such a policy or simply pointing out how idiotic WoD really is?
 
Yeah, sorry that all the press conferences werent preserved for your approval, LOLOLOL.
:lamo

Lets recap. States pass laws legalizing marijuana. Obamas JD declares intent to attack them anyway, even the legal dispensaries. Congress acts by passing bi-partisan spending amendment crippling the Obama JD ability to attack state dispensaries. You claim "yay Obama".

FM
 
:lamo

Lets recap. States pass laws legalizing marijuana. Obamas JD declares intent to attack them anyway, even the legal dispensaries. Congress acts by passing bi-partisan spending amendment crippling the Obama JD ability to attack state dispensaries. You claim "yay Obama".

FM

LOL, Obama declaring hands off occured before the states legalized it.
 
LOL, Obama declaring hands off occured before the states legalized it.
And yet the DoJ is targeting them in 2015. Are you suggesting Holder went rogue?

:lamo
 
And yet the DoJ is targeting them in 2015. Are you suggesting Holder went rogue?

:lamo

Not here and not in CO. And my claim was that Obama's hands-off policy came first. Thanks for confirming that.
 
The GOP - always picking the right side of the issue!
 
I really don't see what there is to like. :shrug:

Let's call it the "I could have a beer with this guy"-effect. I don't necessarily like his politics, but he seems far more genuine than snakes like Cruz and Rubio.
 
Back
Top Bottom