• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

MSNBC's Poll -- Will you vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016?

Josie

*probably reading smut*
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
57,295
Reaction score
31,718
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
It's MSNBC? The poll would reverse itself if it was held on FoxNews.com
 
I wouldn't vote for Hillary if he was the last man on earth.
 
I just can't fathom four years of that screechy, whiny, empty voice.
 
Poll: Hillary 2016 | MSNBC

A whopping 87% (last I checked) say no. What do you think is behind these numbers?

Maybe it's like DP polls used to be and the results are highjacked by some wanting to skew the results. 87% opposed isn't credible. It's what the number should be, if people thought straight, but it's not credible.
 
Poll: Hillary 2016 | MSNBC

A whopping 87% (last I checked) say no. What do you think is behind these numbers?

Clinton fatigue. A lot of people are sick of hearing about her, or him, or their daughter. Hillary's campaign attempt at re-branding is coming across as contrived, which it is. That's not entirely her fault.

IMHO Americans in general are wiser and/or jaded. We've seen this circus one too many times. I think most Americans are looking at all campaign talk with a jaundiced eye. It's just so much blather, from all of them frankly. Much of what they say is feel good bull**** and America is weary. That applies to all candidates. But Hillary has been around since before Christ left Chicago. We've heard her and seen her and lived with her, and Bill, for so long it's difficult as hell for anyone to suddenly see her as the new fantastic Hillary, answer to all problems!

She's driving across the nation to reach out and listen to "real Americans". As is if she remembers who real Americans are. Her campaign strategy was in the suitcase and ready for the road before she took a seat in the van. Which is bullet-proof, by the way. Hillary isn't driving either. She reportedly hasn't driven since 1996.:roll: The only real American who can relate to not driving for 20 years is Stevie Wonder.

If Hillary really wanted to "help" real Americans she could tell us how to invest in cattle futures. We haven't forgotten who "Hill" is. She's been at it or connected to it for a long, long, long time. She won't be successful in creating a new persona.
 
Last edited:
Clinton fatigue. A lot of people are sick of hearing about her, or him, or their daughter. Hillary's campaign attempt at re-branding is coming across as contrived, which it is. That's not entirely her fault.

IMHO Americans in general are wiser and/or jaded. We've seen this circus one too many times. I think most Americans are looking at all campaign talk with a jaundiced eye. It's just so much blather, from all of them frankly. Much of what they say is feel good bull**** and America is weary. That applies to all candidates. But Hillary has been around since before Christ left Chicago. We've heard her and seen her and lived with her, and Bill, for so long it's difficult as hell for anyone to suddenly see her as the new fantastic Hillary, answer to all problems!

She's driving across the nation to reach out and listen to to "real Americans". As is if she remembers who real Americans are. Her campaign strategy was in the suitcase and ready for the road before she took a seat in the van. Which is bullet-proof, by the way. Hillary isn't driving either. She reportedly hasn't driven since 1996.:roll: The only real American who can relate to not driving for 20 years is Stevie Wonder.

If Hillary really wanted to "help" real Americans she'd could tell us how to invest in cattle futures. We haven't forgotten who "Hill" is. She's been at it or connected to it for a long, long, long time. She won't be successful in creating a new persona.

:lamo ..... :applaud
 
Poll: Hillary 2016 | MSNBC

A whopping 87% (last I checked) say no. What do you think is behind these numbers?

87% won't vote for her in public but get them in the booth and 114% will.

If next Nov ends up a Bush v Clinton vote I'm just going to write in Sara Palin.



Come to think of it I may end up doing that anyway.
 
Poll: Hillary 2016 | MSNBC

A whopping 87% (last I checked) say no. What do you think is behind these numbers?

It is fairly easy to dismiss the results of the online polling, especially given the results of more controlled polling by the usual suspects. Of course some of these are a little old, but we have enough data so far to suggest she will not only do well in her own primary but looks to be doing well against likely Republicans in a general election.

With all of this said though, we have much time between now and the 2016 elections. Plenty can happen and we have not even begun to see the real attack ads she will likely face concerning everything from Hillarycare to Benghazi.

57% Think Hillary Clinton Likely To Win in 2016 - Rasmussen Reports™

Clinton Favorability, Familiarity Bests 2016 Contenders

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 Presidential Polls
 
87% won't vote for her in public but get them in the booth and 114% will.

If next Nov ends up a Bush v Clinton vote I'm just going to write in Sara Palin.



Come to think of it I may end up doing that anyway.

That's the partisan for you. Conservative republicans weren't all that excited about Romney either. But given the alternative, they lined up to vote for him.
 
It is fairly easy to dismiss the results of the online polling, especially given the results of more controlled polling by the usual suspects. Of course some of these are a little old, but we have enough data so far to suggest she will not only do well in her own primary but looks to be doing well against likely Republicans in a general election.

With all of this said though, we have much time between now and the 2016 elections. Plenty can happen and we have not even begun to see the real attack ads she will likely face concerning everything from Hillarycare to Benghazi.

57% Think Hillary Clinton Likely To Win in 2016 - Rasmussen Reports™

Clinton Favorability, Familiarity Bests 2016 Contenders

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 Presidential Polls

Everybody thinks she'll win, but nobody will vote for her. Interesting.
 
Even though I'm not voting for her and probably not for him is it fair to lessen them based on their name?

Of course not. But the American presidency is not to be an oligarchy, or monarchy, or malarkey. It's also a rare post. Out of a billion Americans that have lived and died in our short history, 44 have been president. I just don't want it hanging around in any families. And it's looking like the GOP is so short on talent these days that they must pick their presidents from one family.
 
Clinton fatigue. A lot of people are sick of hearing about her, or him, or their daughter. Hillary's campaign attempt at re-branding is coming across as contrived, which it is. That's not entirely her fault.

IMHO Americans in general are wiser and/or jaded. We've seen this circus one too many times. I think most Americans are looking at all campaign talk with a jaundiced eye. It's just so much blather, from all of them frankly. Much of what they say is feel good bull**** and America is weary. That applies to all candidates. But Hillary has been around since before Christ left Chicago. We've heard her and seen her and lived with her, and Bill, for so long it's difficult as hell for anyone to suddenly see her as the new fantastic Hillary, answer to all problems!

She's driving across the nation to reach out and listen to "real Americans". As is if she remembers who real Americans are. Her campaign strategy was in the suitcase and ready for the road before she took a seat in the van. Which is bullet-proof, by the way. Hillary isn't driving either. She reportedly hasn't driven since 1996.:roll: The only real American who can relate to not driving for 20 years is Stevie Wonder.

If Hillary really wanted to "help" real Americans she could tell us how to invest in cattle futures. We haven't forgotten who "Hill" is. She's been at it or connected to it for a long, long, long time. She won't be successful in creating a new persona.

kendrick-lamar-they-wasnt-ready.png


Oh ****. Lol, that **** got me laughing so hard I fell off my chair.
 
77,000 people on MSNBC.com voted? There aren't even 77K people watching MSNBC. :lol:
 
77,000 people on MSNBC.com voted? There aren't even 77K people watching MSNBC. :lol:

It was the Chicago version of the website.
 
Poll: Hillary 2016 | MSNBC

A whopping 87% (last I checked) say no. What do you think is behind these numbers?

MSNBC's viewer base is basically liberal. For whom else to they have to vote? Meaningless nonsense. A better poll would be limited to non partisans.
 
Everybody thinks she'll win, but nobody will vote for her. Interesting.

You may want to try reading my post again.
 
What I want to know is who are the 23% that answered that they would vote for her? These have to be some of the absolute dumbest lemmings on the planet.
 
Back
Top Bottom