- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
There was no staging of a scene.It is not procedure to stage the crime scene,
Your claim is nothing more than evidnce of convoluted thoughts.
And again, you are assuming he took the taser.he took the taser from the spot the officer dropped it, from what one can see threw it towards the suspect and later picked it up.
Secondly, if it was the taser, it is procedure to secure it. How that is accomplished is irrelevant.
Finally, suggesting that his taking it, (when it is procedure to secure it) away from the area it was used indicates some kind of malfeasance, is just showing the claimant is ignorant of procedure, and ignorant of the fact that the taser cartridge shoots out id tags to establish and mark were it was used.
Your comment is irrelevant as well as counter to the position you already professed.There was nothing to secure at the spot mr. Scott was executed at.
Execution is not manslaughter.
So all you are doing is showing you are purposely and obnoxiously making false claims.
And of course the reasons for such nonsense do not speak well of the person making such claims.
What lie?Yet more evidence of the lies of mr. Slager.
Saying he is lying is a lie in itself.
So again, what lie?
Prove there is a lie.
:dohTASER TASER TASER
Is what officer Slager shouted according to the LA times on the dashcam video.
And they noted that when Slager shouted, "Taser! Taser! Taser!" it meant he was about to use the non-lethal weapon.
'Taser! Taser! Taser!' a possible clue in dashboard camera video - LA Times
Again showing you do not understand the sequence of events.
Do you not understand that this happened prior to what we see in the video?
Please tell me you didn't so I can laugh even harder.
Your comment just shows you choose to ignore the evidence and are ignorant of the sequence of events.He was using his taser ... and then he just went for his gun and shot the guy dead.
What an absurd comment.but must have done it piss poor
1. If it malfunctioned a malfunction may not be attributable to the Officer.
2. It was used while the suspect was resisting both probes may not have landed properly.
But of course to someone who is absurdly biased, it has to be the Officer's fault. :doh
Your comment was lame and truly paints you as a non-objective and significantly biased person.
No one has been able to show he lied at any point.And his false statements also remain evidence.
Yet here you are continuing to make the same false claim.
Back up what you say.
Prove he lied.
Your narrative is spin.Pulling away from an officer you fear is going to hurt is not the same thing as being a violent criminal.
In reality he was fighting a cop who was doing his job.
That fighting makes him violent.
And lets not forget his previous police encounter in 1987 either.
Walter Scott was jailed for assault and battery in 1987 and shoved a deputy when he was arrested
Walter Scott was jailed for assault and battery in 1987 | Daily Mail Online
Here he was fighting another person and then pushed a cop doing his job.
Some people never learn.
And don't try to claim he ran because he was fearful of the Officer. That would be nonsense.
He took off while his information was being checked, not because he feared the Officer.
That is indicative of another narrative.
He took off for another unknown reason that he thought was serious enough to run from law enforcement.