Still ignoring the evidence,
:naughty
No. As already shown, it is you who are ignoring the evidnce and making things up.
threads from the taser into the victim, not the cop.
And? Why are you not paying attention?
Just why do you think this matters?
Everybody but you apparently knows that the taser was discharged prior to what we see.
Why do you not understand this?
They were on the ground struggling. But you again do not seem to understand that.
You just continue to ignore the sequence of events.
Had you bothered to pay attention, this lead (leads?) actually travels down to the suspect's ankle area.
But of course you ignore that in your rush to judgment.
And to not understand that those leads would have gotten tangled around both of them as the suspect fought the Officer on the ground, is showing a person who doesn't understand or doesn't know the sequence of event.
The lead (leads) which can be seen above, appears to travel over the Officer's arm and then down to what appears to be the used cartridge by his feet.
And had you paid attention to the video you would have seen
what appears to be the cartridge being dragged by the fleeing suspect.
Your focus on this is irrelevant, as clearly you do not understand it's relevance.
Still does not change a frigging thing,
As that is what it is, of course it can not change reality, but it does show you to be wrong.
even if you were right and the dead man threw the taser (even though zero evidence supports that) that would weaken the officers case.
And this is where you are again wrong.
The moment he grabbed the taser he became a significant threat. The Officer is already responding to this threat prior to it being thrown. That is a major point and does not weaken his case at all, but actually supports it.
Review the video provided to finebead. The Officer continues to fire on a fleeing suspect after he throws his weapon and was cleared because the suspect established himself as a significant threat.
So maybe you should brush up your understanding of the law and of what is and is not permissible.
The facts still remain the same:
Yes the facts as I showed them to you remain the same and are not going to change.
What you do not have though are facts as you absurdly claim.
1. running man with nothing in his hands
2. considerable distance from the officer with his back turned to the officer when the officer started shooting
3. there was no legal basis for this shooting
4. you are wrong, your so called evidence says nothing. The video I posted showed the threads from the officer towards the dead man. You have nothing.
1. Not a fact. An assumption.
2. Ignores the fact that the Officer was already in the process of responding to the threat he made himself prior to his fleeing.
3. Again not a fact as there clearly is legal basis. He was a significant threat the moment he took the taser.
4. More non-facts. :doh
As for the video.. iLOL :lamo And? You do not seem to understand what it shows
(as already shown) or it's significance.