:doh You have to hash it first to rehash it, which you definitely have not done.
All you have done is make things up, and assume.
It is not reasonable suspicion. It is probable cause to believe. Different standards.
And again. The suspect taking the taser satisfies the requirement. You haven't been able to refute that, nor could you.
Trial?
It hasn't even gotten past the Grand Jury point yet.
That is not a fact. This is you making things up.
Irrelevant. And just shows how weak your arguments are.
Wrong.
His taking the taser made him a significant threat.
Wrong.
Responding appropriately to a threat is not brutality.
This absurd comment just shows that you are not even qualified to be speaking on this subject.
You do not fire warning shots.
As you are the one ignoring reality, it is your problem, not mine.
The moment the suspect took the taser he became a significant threat.
You can not refute that.
In this case your statement is wrong.
The suspect was a significant threat as soon as he took the taser. As such, the Officers response is defensible.
You still haven't been able to refute that.
Yay! Finally, admittance you are assuming.
No it wasn't at his feet.
And again.
The Officer is drawing his firearm while the suspect has the taser.
No, you are wrong and your comments are nonsense as shown.
You still have failed to refute the actual evidence.
The suspect was a significant threat as soon as he took the taser. It is that threat to which the Officer was responding. Saying otherwise is ludicrous.
If you think that why have you been arguing murder and execution? Do you not know they are not the same things as manslaughter?
Or did you change your mind? If not, why the heck have you been arguing with me? Did you not see what I said in my second post?
That black thing was likely the tazer that the guy took as reported by the Officer.
At the moment of the shooting it doesn't appear as the Officer knew he threw it down.
If so, this would indicate that the Officer (in his mind) was responding to an actual threat.
That information and whether he moved the tazer after the fact and why, may be the difference between manslaughter or involuntary manslaughter and that of a murder conviction.