• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What's in the Iran nuclear deal? 7 key points

Let's hope these negotiations fail. We haven't been in a boots on the ground war in a few years. We're slipping. :roll:
 
Yawn...

Obama has a framework. Whoop-de-doo!


Let me know when he actually makes a deal.

I keep waiting to see where that anti-Semitic weasel Obama requires a clause in the treaty where Iran concedes Israels right to exist and ends calls for Israels destruction. Until then, the hope of this treaty bringing peace to the ME is about as worthless as Obama himself.
 
What amazes me is the supposed "importance" of a deal. You have got to be pretty gullible to think that Iran would abide by any agreement, written or verbal.
I think that that is not really an issue with some. The concern seems to be: gotta get a deal done regardless of the details within.

Allah says lie to the Satan.
 
Nothing much to discuss, Iran is well on it's way to achieving nuks.

Which they were before and will be after. That toothpaste isn't going to go back in the tube.
 
I keep waiting to see where that anti-Semitic weasel Obama requires a clause in the treaty where Iran concedes Israels right to exist and ends calls for Israels destruction. Until then, the hope of this treaty bringing peace to the ME is about as worthless as Obama himself.

What an utterly worthless post.
 
Let's hope these negotiations fail. We haven't been in a boots on the ground war in a few years. We're slipping. :roll:

Sanctions sure seem to have been working, them Obama lifted some and is going to lift them all and billions are going flow back to Iran to use in support of their terror buddies around the Middle East and to further expand their nuke program.
 
That's pretty ridiculous. So you agree with Chainsaw that Obama is anti-Semitic?

Let me put it this way, Israel is under the bus and Iran is at the head of the other end of dinner table. You tell me.
 
Let me put it this way, Israel is under the bus and Iran is at the head of the other end of dinner table. You tell me.

With a stockpile of nuclear weapons, and a freak at the helm willing to bomb Iran, a vastly weaker nation militarily, how is it that Israel is under the Bus?
 
With a stockpile of nuclear weapons, and a freak at the helm willing to bomb Iran, a vastly weaker nation militarily, how is it that Israel is under the Bus?

Iran says that their goal for the destruction of Israel is non-negotiable. If Obama gave a flying-futsbha about Israel, shouldn't a requirement of the treaty be for Iran to recognize Israels right to exist and to end the mantra to destroy Israel? Huh?
 
...Yep...Chamberlain would be proud of Obama.

Every international conflict is not the same as WWII. Its time we stop applying the WWII model to every situation. Not that I'm saying we should ever trust another nation or politician, but we don't need to start another war over what another nation might do in the future.
 
Iran says that their goal for the destruction of Israel is non-negotiable. If Obama gave a flying-futsbha about Israel, shouldn't a requirement of the treaty be for Iran to recognize Israels right to exist and to end the mantra to destroy Israel? Huh?

Its regime change that Iran has called for.
 
Yes a big conspiracy between the unlikely partners of Germany, Russia, France, China, the UK and the US to facilitate a nuclear weapons powered Iran. Btw, the framework for a deal has been assembled. This framework sets the tone and agenda of the deal to follow.

Iran won't play. Why should they?
 
Iran won't play. Why should they?

Wrong, Obama has repeatedly stated that should no deal be reached or Iran fail to meet its obligations to a deal reached, there's still the military option.

Like Israel, the United States has already drawn up plans to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure through military means. And the United States could almost certainly count on the help of Gulf states, which consider the United States, as opposed to Israel, one of their strongest allies.

Nuclear talks: Could force still be used against Iran? - CNN.com
 
Every international conflict is not the same as WWII. Its time we stop applying the WWII model to every situation. Not that I'm saying we should ever trust another nation or politician, but we don't need to start another war over what another nation might do in the future.

My reference to Chamberlain has nothing to do with WWII, rather it has to do with Chamberlain's appeasement. Obama appears to be doing something Chamberlain could identify with.
 
My reference to Chamberlain has nothing to do with WWII, rather it has to do with Chamberlain's appeasement. Obama appears to be doing something Chamberlain could identify with.

Obama, and Merkel, and Jinping, and Cameron, and Putin, and Hollande.
 
Obama, and Merkel, and Jinping, and Cameron, and Putin, and Hollande.

Greetings, Montecresto. :2wave:

Was Obama there? All I saw was Kerry representing the US. Of the countries negotiating, four of the six were the elected leaders of their countries - I don't know who Jinping is.
 
Greetings, Montecresto. :2wave:

Was Obama there? All I saw was Kerry representing the US. Of the countries negotiating, four of the six were the elected leaders of their countries - I don't know who Jinping is.

Jinping Xi is the president of China.
 
And get nuked by Israel.

Iran has repeatedly vowed to annihilate Israel. Israel should attack with everything they got, nuclear weapons included. The alternative is for all Jews to flee Israel. Now.
 
My reference to Chamberlain has nothing to do with WWII, rather it has to do with Chamberlain's appeasement. Obama appears to be doing something Chamberlain could identify with.

No, it is vastly worst than Chamberlain.
 
Back
Top Bottom