chromium
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2013
- Messages
- 16,968
- Reaction score
- 3,770
- Location
- A2
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Nothing in any of the RFRA laws target anyone, and you are just projecting your incorrect views. Like myself & legal experts have stated, and the opponents of these laws won't accept, is the RFRA has NEVER been used to successfully discriminate by denying service. But keep beating that drum.
indiana's governor wrote to the lobbyists that the law would put a stop to the gay agenda and "cross dressing" (what he thinks of transgender) and it would protect christian. See, no mention of minority religions like the early 90s RFRA, no attempt to even pretend it's not anti gay.
Now the governor is trying to circle the wagons and pretend it was never about that, only because the hostility to his law is at epic levels. You are pulling this apologist crap on behalf of a scumbag politician, but you may as well just stop, cause i'll never fall for it.
The "RFRA" were never worded like this or conceived as an anti gay strategy until recently. It's way too early to know how many cases there'll be in the next few years, before federal courts get off their ass and put a stop to it. And rest assured this will be as loathed and conquered as "DOMA", "DADT", consensual sex laws, and every other attempt to oppress
Last edited: