- Joined
- Nov 20, 2013
- Messages
- 16,168
- Reaction score
- 17,691
- Location
- Chi-town
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
1.) false based on legality and definition they are
2.) see #1
3.) again see #1 EEO/AA protects all of us
4.) actually its based on facts, AS MY STSTMENT IS WRITTEN, its 100% true and trying to dishonestly change it to something else is a complete failure and straw man.
if you disagree simply post the law that says "i must serve gays", you will completely fail and your lie or ignorance of the law will be shown.
5.) thank you for proving me 100% right, see where you use dthe word IF, that proves me right.
maybe read the thread before you jump in the middle and totally own your own posts.
the claim was made that there is force to serve protected groupp, that is 100% false. No law exists.
what you just posted an example of AFTER the if is a law that makes ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATION a crime . . NOT simply not serving anybody who belongs to a groups/
so the fact remains i can in fact deny service to anybody i want
what i can not do is violate peoples rights or break the law
simply denying service does NOT do that
6.) i did no that and it was exactly my point, thank you for making it for me. Next time try to understand what is being discussed and you wont repeat the mistake you made. Thanks!
If I walk into your place of business requesting a transaction with you and you refuse that transaction based on My skin color or gender then you are breaking the law. If investigated you would need to come of with a believable smokescreen of why you refused to conduct business with Me. If a pattern was found, that wouldn't fare none that well in your favor.