• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama adviser behind leak of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal

It's the same frustration when folks were trying to get similar answers a decade ago and partisan hacks were running cover. It's the folly of partisanship.

Bush White House email controversy
Bush White House email controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Back to Nyah nyah
nyah.gif
again huh, Monte? Buuuuuuush! :lamo
 
How does that question apply to on-going subpenoas issued to the State Dept. WH and CIA involving emails.....which involved Those Administration Officials with Benghazi going back to 2012?


message headers (unless forged) contain the email address of the sender.

it would say if she used a state.gov (or whatnot). or a gmail account (or whatnot) or a hillaryisthebestestever.com account (or whatnot).

so if she turned over emails in 2012-2013, anyone with a IQ above 65 or so, should have noticed that she was not using an official email address (if she was not).

and IF* this is scandal worthy, it should have been made a scandal thus 2 years ago
 
Back to Nyah nyah
nyah.gif
again huh, Monte? Buuuuuuush! :lamo

No, I'm back to accountability and the problem with the blind partisan. I wish that for one day at DP, MMC would be fair and balanced and acknowledge that presidents, regardless of party, engage in laundering. Your one sided approach is accomplishing nothing. IOW, expose Obama's corruption, get it out there, we need that. You should have been doing the same with bush. Maybe you'll do better on the next GOP president.
 
I don't think he understands the question.

Oh I understand it.....you're the one that cant figure out how long subpenoas for classified information goes on and on. Some taking a couple of years or longer.

So when it all comes to an end.....I doubt you will even be able to even understand what happened. But that's alright.....remember that Song. Where they sang there will be days like this.
 
No, I'm back to accountability and the problem with the blind partisan. I wish that for one day at DP, MMC would be fair and balanced and acknowledge that presidents, regardless of party, engage in laundering. Your one sided approach is accomplishing nothing. IOW, expose Obama's corruption, get it out there, we need that. You should have been doing the same with bush. Maybe you'll do better on the next GOP president.

hopefully there won't be one
 
message headers (unless forged) contain the email address of the sender.

it would say if she used a state.gov (or whatnot). or a gmail account (or whatnot) or a hillaryisthebestestever.com account (or whatnot).

so if she turned over emails in 2012-2013, anyone with a IQ above 65 or so, should have noticed that she was not using an official email address (if she was not).

and IF* this is scandal worthy, it should have been made a scandal thus 2 years ago



What part about a subpenoa filed back in 2012 that doesn't come out until 2014. Due to fighting against the release of those emails in court. Don't you get?

You weren't saying the respective Depts weren't fighting in court were you?
 
And to think all those Obama sycophants are trying to pump up their hero as Hillary's first nomination to the Supreme Court when she's elected President.
 
And to think all those Obama sycophants are trying to pump up their hero as Hillary's first nomination to the Supreme Court when she's elected President.

Absolutely positively would not be confirmed if nominated and in my view would not accept the nomination - he is going to get richer than Clinton in his post presidency and the SCOTUS would greatly get in the way of that
 
No, I'm back to accountability and the problem with the blind partisan. I wish that for one day at DP, MMC would be fair and balanced and acknowledge that presidents, regardless of party, engage in laundering. Your one sided approach is accomplishing nothing. IOW, expose Obama's corruption, get it out there, we need that. You should have been doing the same with bush. Maybe you'll do better on the next GOP president.

Oh give it a break Monte.....of course Republicans have done the same human thing that Democrats and all other Humans do. Yes yes.....no humans are allegedly better than any other and all are created equal, Right Monte.

Tells us how you can dribble a Basketball and jump up for a 9 ft slamdunk while going thru 3 other people knocking ya around. ALL equal Right Monte?

Figure it out.....Its called Politics!
 
Absolutely positively would not be confirmed if nominated and in my view would not accept the nomination - he is going to get richer than Clinton in his post presidency and the SCOTUS would greatly get in the way of that

I'm guessing a gig on ESPN is what he'll be pushing for, with lots of time off for golf and squeezing cash out of idiot liberals on the rubber chicken circuit.
 
I'm guessing a gig on ESPN is what he'll be pushing for, with lots of time off for golf and squeezing cash out of idiot liberals on the rubber chicken circuit.

Heya CJ. :2wave: While fighting to prevent releases of information on classified material, from coming out anytime soon.....once he hits pasture.
 
hopefully there won't be one

The electorate gets pissed at one and hands it back to the other, back and forth back and forth. Are you really hoping that there won't be another GOP presidency?
 
Oh give it a break Monte.....of course Republicans have done the same human thing that Democrats and all other Humans do. Yes yes.....no humans are allegedly better than any other and all are created equal, Right Monte.

Tells us how you can dribble a Basketball and jump up for a 9 ft slamdunk while going thru 3 other people knocking ya around. ALL equal Right Monte?

Figure it out.....Its called Politics!

Consistency. Learn it, use it.
 
The difference is.....we weren't talking about them. Were we?

It still doesn't change the fact of what BO said.....and whats going on now. Which if Valjar is in on any it. Then so to is BO peep..



Holy ****!

Things really ARE bad if they have to go back over a half a century to find a comparison for Hillary's misdeeds!

Not even slimy Obama rated that.....lame defense.
 
Heya CJ. :2wave: While fighting to prevent releases of information on classified material, from coming out anytime soon.....once he hits pasture.

Obama coming out anytime soon? Did Valerie leak some additional information?
 
Obama coming out anytime soon? Did Valerie leak some additional information?

Nah you know how it is.....most of the libs think all the information over Benghazi was released with the First Investigation. So they have a little trouble comprehending why things are still going on.
 
Nah you know how it is.....most of the libs think all the information over Benghazi was released with the First Investigation. So they have a little trouble comprehending why things are still going on.

are you tripling down on the idea that there was not one clinton email with a message header released in the previous benghazi investigations?
 
are you tripling down on the idea that there was not one clinton email with a message header released in the previous benghazi investigations?

No I didn't say that.....how do you think they figured out there was gap in the emails. What.....tangent are you reaching for?
 
no i didn't say that.....how do you think they figured out there was gap in the emails. What.....tangent are you reaching for?


for the last time if they had an email 2-3 years ago with a message header they would have known she was not using an official email account. (assuming that she was not)
 
Nah you know how it is.....most of the libs think all the information over Benghazi was released with the First Investigation. So they have a little trouble comprehending why things are still going on.



And they also don't "get" that this is new information on that scandal.

Because she testified, the left plays the exoneration game, there was no direct evidence that based on the evidence at that time that she screwed up. To them the case is "settled", however the misdeeds of Bush, Reagan, Eisenhower and HST now have to be regurgitation in semi truth as a defense, ad nauseum.

However, her emails on that point were withheld from that investigation. Now, they cry fowl, "right wing conspiracy" and badgering over "old news".

It's not "old news" when it was just learned yesterday. Americans need to know what's in those emails she deliberately withheld from a congressional investigation.....and why?
 
for the last time if they had an email 2-3 years ago with a message header they would have known she was not using an official email account. (assuming that she was not)

Yes the Repubs have known about the Emails and her using a personal account since 2013, at the same time BO learned about it.
 
I don't care who was responsible, but I hope they didn't damage Lady Broadbeam too much. As long as that damned leftist liar gets her party's nomination, we are in good shape.
 
Back
Top Bottom