• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama adviser behind leak of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal

MMC said:
Cmon now DH. :2wave: BO said she was the BEST EVAAAA.....Secretary of State we ever had. :2razz:
:2wave:

Plus she has more to deal with and come out over Libya and Benghazi, then the 6 Billions she lost at State. Plus her donor issue. I had up a link about how her Trainwreck has arrived.
yes.gif
Click to expand...

Hey dude, Every president thinks they made the best choices.
 
Chainsaw said:
:) The Benghazi investigation is JUST STARTING! Maybe there can finally be some answers for the families of four dead Americans, instead of presidential posturing.
Click to expand...

Mornin Chainsaw. :2wave: they actually have someone there now that knows how to conduct an investigation. Gowdy already stated Clinton will have to Testify twice over the emails and this time not just Benghazi. But all of her Libya Policy. Which will bring down Cheryl Mills, Gloria Nuland, Samantha Powers, and shine some more light on Susan Rice.

Maybe if things get real hot for Hillary.....she will turn around and Set BO peep and the Lost sheep out in return.

jackson_pop_corn.gif
 
Montecresto said:
Hey dude, Every president thinks they made the best choices.
Click to expand...

The problem is that Obama is just a mouthpiece for Valerie Jarrett, who actually runs the country. Valerie would rather see someone left of Clinton run for the Dems. When forced,Bill Clinton pivoted to the center. Valerie would nave none of that.
 
Montecresto said:
Hey dude, Every president thinks they made the best choices.
Click to expand...

Then why has BO peep changed Secretary Defense 3 times, again? Let me guess you will say BO was taught to share, huh. :lol:
 
SlevinKelevra said:
they couldn't find that her email address wasn't through state.gov (or whatever)?
seems pretty incompetent
Click to expand...


They found out she had two emails to the one she had. Which is why the AP and Judicial Watch are going after all communications for Hillary and her Aide Huma Abedin, with Morsi's Wife.....and then already had major gaps from what she turned in 2 years ago.
 
MMC said:
Then why has BO peep changed Secretary Defense 3 times, again? Let me guess you will say BO was taught to share, huh. :lol:
Click to expand...

Truman had 4, and Ike had 3.

There are a lot of things to criticize Obama for (with good reason), I don't think that is one of them.

Honestly, I don't see one compelling reason why cabinet members should be static.
 
MMC said:
They found out she had two emails to the one she had. Which is why the AP and Judicial Watch are going after all communications for Hillary and her Aide Huma Abedin, with Morsi's Wife.....and then already had major gaps from what she turned in 2 years ago.
Click to expand...


you're missing the point.

why wasn't this discovered 2+ years ago?
 
MMC said:
Mornin Chainsaw. :2wave: they actually have someone there now that knows how to conduct an investigation. Gowdy already stated Clinton will have to Testify twice over the emails and this time not just Benghazi. But all of her Libya Policy. Which will bring down Cheryl Mills, Gloria Nuland, Samantha Powers, and shine some more light on Susan Rice.

Maybe if things get real hot for Hillary.....she will turn around and Set BO peep and the Lost sheep out in return.

jackson_pop_corn.gif
Click to expand...

Amen there. Remember how Obama/Hillary/libs were so giddy with the political accomplishment of 'removing Kadafi'? Then they leave the vacuum to allow Obama's muslim brotherhood buddies to turn Libya into a true ISIS/terrorist state. Nice work Obama, .......but he thinks it is.
 
SlevinKelevra said:
Truman had 4, and Ike had 3.

There are a lot of things to criticize Obama for (with good reason), I don't think that is one of them.

Honestly, I don't see one compelling reason why cabinet members should be static.
Click to expand...


The difference is.....we weren't talking about them. Were we?

It still doesn't change the fact of what BO said.....and whats going on now. Which if Valjar is in on any it. Then so to is BO peep..
 
SlevinKelevra said:
you're missing the point.

why wasn't this discovered 2+ years ago?
Click to expand...



Because.....the Classified information was not released from State who had the Benghazi emails. Moreover they had to straighten out the email mess with CIA and State, with what the WH knew at the time. Which they did focus on there until they had all the Emails.

Note how that took time to.....with the Demos, State, and WH, blocking and trying to do end runs around each other.
 
SlevinKelevra said:
you're missing the point.

why wasn't this discovered 2+ years ago?
Click to expand...

It's a good question. Is it possible that what she did was considered one of those "youthful transgressions" that everybody does in Washington and nobody cares about, until one day somebody says, "Hey, you know what? This could totally be an issue if we talk about it."
 
MMC said:
Because.....the Classified information was not released from State who had the Benghazi emails. Moreover they had to straighten out the email mess with CIA and State, with what the WH knew at the time. Which they did focus on there until they had all the Emails.

Note how that took time to.....with the Demos, State, and WH, blocking and trying to do end runs around each other.
Click to expand...

smh, it's clear you'd rather spout talking points than address a rather obvious and simple question.
 
sawdust said:
The problem is that Obama is just a mouthpiece for Valerie Jarrett, who actually runs the country. Valerie would rather see someone left of Clinton run for the Dems. When forced,Bill Clinton pivoted to the center. Valerie would nave none of that.
Click to expand...

Like bush was a mouthpiece for PNAC. And of course the dem's want someone to the left of that hawk Hillary.
 
Cardinal said:
It's a good question. Is it possible that what she did was considered one of those "youthful transgressions" that everybody does in Washington and nobody cares about, until one day somebody says, "Hey, you know what? This could totally be an issue if we talk about it."
Click to expand...



Well until some can actually figure out....that there were these huge gaps in Emails and Reports which came over time and thru the first 4 investigations. Imagine that.

Funny how most can figure that out now......by doing what BO peep does. Watching TV. Whats your excuse now?
 
MMC said:
Then why has BO peep changed Secretary Defense 3 times, again? Let me guess you will say BO was taught to share, huh. :lol:
Click to expand...

No, it has nothing to do with sharing. And the real reasons are rarely known.
 
MMC said:
The difference is.....we weren't talking about them. Were we?

It still doesn't change the fact of what BO said.....and whats going on now. Which if Valjar is in on any it. Then so to is BO peep..
Click to expand...

That's ridiculous, if going through three SoD's means trouble, then it means trouble.
 
SlevinKelevra said:
smh, it's clear you'd rather spout talking points than address a rather obvious and simple question.
Click to expand...

I just answered it.....you just didn't like the answer. Whats so hard to figure out? That all the information over Benghazi was not released with the first 6 investigations?

Which clearly relates to Hillary.
 
MMC said:
Well until some can actually figure out....that there were these huge gaps in Emails and Reports which came over time and thru the first 4 investigations. Imagine that.

Funny how most can figure that out now......by doing what BO peep does. Watching TV. Whats your excuse now?
Click to expand...


did the emails provided have message headers
yes
or
no


answer with one word.
 
MMC said:
Whats not ridiculous.....is BO not being in on anything that ValJar, is.
Click to expand...

You suggested something wrong that Obama's had three SoD's. And then dismissed the fact that so did the republican president Eisenhower.
 
SlevinKelevra said:
did the emails provided have message headers or not

yes
or
no


answer with one word.
Click to expand...


How does that question apply to on-going subpenoas issued to the State Dept. WH and CIA involving emails.....which involved Those Administration Officials with Benghazi going back to 2012?
 
MMC said:
How does that question apply to on-going subpenoas issued to the State Dept. WH and CIA involving emails.....which involved Those Administration Officials with Benghazi going back to 2012?
Click to expand...

It's the same frustration when folks were trying to get similar answers a decade ago and partisan hacks were running cover. It's the folly of partisanship.

Bush White House email controversy
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy
 
Montecresto said:
You suggested something wrong that Obama's had three SoD's. And then dismissed the fact that so did the republican president Eisenhower.
Click to expand...

Yeah yeah anything to deflect Right Monte.....oh heavens to murgatroid. the Repubs did it too. Nyah Nyah!
nyah.gif
So that is suppose to mean something now. :roll:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom