- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: Sandy Hook families sue estate of shooter's mother
And make no mistake their are some laws that require such.
Again. Pencils? Knifes? Hammers?
Nail gun?
You are being ridiculous.
They are both tools which can do damage.
You do not hold another responsible for some one else's actions. Period.
The only person who should be held responsible is the person who did the act.
Sad.
Your comments were juvenile and nothing more than a deflectio from having to form a logical argument against what I stated. As such they applied to you far more than they applied to me. I can not help if you do not understand that.Very nice! The debate equivalent of 'I know you are but what am I?" How...1st grade of you. Did someone have to help you type that too?
Only if the law requires such.Look...if you are the parent or guardian of a child, especially one that you know is very clearly demonstrating violent and aggressive tendencies, then you have an obligation to take reasonable steps to secure both the childs safety and that of those around him.
And make no mistake their are some laws that require such.
What law says this?Leaving a weapon which can reasonably be expected to be used to harm large numbers of people in a non-secured environment and within easy access to that individual makes you at LEAST civilly liable.
Again. Pencils? Knifes? Hammers?
Nail gun?
You are being ridiculous.
Wrong. That would be your stupid argument.But where you jump off the 'stupid' reservation and land squarely into 'retarded' is when you want to make the inane comparison of an AR15 with high capacity magazines to pencils.
They are both tools which can do damage.
You do not hold another responsible for some one else's actions. Period.
The only person who should be held responsible is the person who did the act.
Still acting like a juvenile I see.And if you are too stupid to understand that, ...
Sad.