• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kerry admits deal with Iran would not be 'legally binding'

Was it a declared war by congress or just wishful thinking by neocons?

War as perceived by the Iranians. More Americans were killed by the militia's they trained, armed, trained, and supported in Iraq than in the oh-so-infamous Sunni Triangle. Unfortunately, it only takes one to start a war, but two to finish.

From what I understand, the sanctions are still in place and they didn't prevent Iran from building/expanding it's nuclear energy program.

They helped crush their economy, and put severe pressure on the regime. There were a number of actions taken (from - probably - Israeli assassinations of nuclear scientists to the development of the Stuxnet virus to the bombing of the secret nuclear weapons facility in Syria) during that time as well that helped delay the Iranian nuclear program.
 
I thought we were talking Iran's government and as far as I know, they've never used "suicide bombers".

:confused: The Iranian regime has used more suicide bombers than any other entity on earth. They developed the modern VBIED, the suicide vest, all the little delights that we've come to know so painfully well.
 
Last edited:
Why give up the inspections for 10 years? So they can continue their progress towards the bomb?

That is what many of us are wondering when we note that the Obama administration basically gives them that time span as long as they wink and pretty-pinky-promise that even though we've caught them lying about their nuclear development multiple times, this time they super-duper mean it when they agree not to. :roll:

Re-instating the sanctions won't prevent them from making a bomb,

Agreed, which is why it should not be the extent of American actions. However, Moot seemed under the impression that the question as binary: either A) a deal or B) war.

in fact it may very well give them a reason to hurry it along. Your mistrust of Iran no matter how justified does not mean that we should just sit by and let them build a bomb when there are alternatives that will strengthen the case of the moderates in Iran and at least delay their progress towards a bomb temporarily.

:doh There are no moderates in Iran that do not want a nuclear bomb. Even the Green Movement in Iran is in favor of developing nuclear weaponry. There are certainly no moderates in the Iranian leadership who will be able to seize power from the current regime. Again, this is like enabling Putin with homes that you will help Russian Homosexuals - nuclear power will strengthen the hardline regime currently in power because it will have achieved a major national goal and helped to reinstate historical Persian regional hegemony. If your goal is "moderates take over", then letting the current regime develop nuclear capability is probably the dumbest thing you can do next to hunting down and killing those moderates yourself.
 
the $1 million question.
as a nation state one would hope so -but as a Shia fundamentalist regime one has to be concerned they aren't rational.
My personal opinion is Iran is doing so well (Hizbollah / Assad /Tikrit offensive) getting nukes would just be a cause for war against them.
While the Sunnis are stuck with internecine war, and Iranian hegemony is expansive

In other words they can prolly be forced to comply with the framework of the P5+1 , and Obama has the power to waive Congressional sanctions.
Past that who knows...we can only hope they are rational
That's a good analysis.

But after the US senators sent letter to Iran warning them not to trust their own president and how the Iran minister responded....one has to wonder who the real irrational extremists are.
 
:confused: The Iranian regime has used more suicide bombers than any other entity on earth. They developed the modern VBIED, the suicide vest, all the little delights that we've come to know so painfully well.

I looked but I couldn't find any proof of that. Maybe you have better luck and can provide credible evidence that Iran regime has used suicide bombers....ever.
 
Ignoring what I said and replacing it with a strawman speaks volumes, too.

Not being able to comprehend what one reads speaks columns too.
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1064419560 said:
Not being able to comprehend what one reads speaks columns too.

First you posed two strawman questions about what I think and then drew a false conclusion that it spoke volumes.

I think it's clear that you can't comprehend your posts.
 
I looked but I couldn't find any proof of that. Maybe you have better luck and can provide credible evidence that Iran regime has used suicide bombers....ever.

Hezbollah, which is an arm of the Iranian regime, started the trend of Islamist suicide bombings in service of terror groups back in the 80s. You may recall they killed a few Marines with the tactic, and by "a few", I of course mean 220. Not only did Iran heavily use suicide bombers in the Iraq Iran war, it used waves of children for that purpose. They had them charge minefields to clear them or wear bombs and bury themselves in shallow holes in roads before the tanks rolled over them in order to achieve more damaging kills. If you can't find any history of Iranian suicide bombing, you must not have looked at all.

"[m]artyrdom-seeking operations mark the highest point of the greatness of a nation and the peak of [its] epic." - Supreme Leader Ali Khamene'i.
 
Uhhh.. it's an agreement. What did you expect? We'd strike a deal where we'd send Dog the Bounty Hunter after them if they didn't comply?

Not sure if you've been following the news lately - some Republican Senators said the same thing recently in a letter, and it sent set some of our left-wing-chattering-class to banging their sippy cups and throwing a little bit of a fit. :)
 
... ?

ad·mit confess to be true or to be the case, typically with reluctance.

Kerry's not confessing or admitting anything. The deal doesn't and shouldn't be "legally binding. " It's an executive agreement.

Which means that the Senators' letter was quite right and proper.
 
:confused: The Iranian regime has used more suicide bombers than any other entity on earth. They developed the modern VBIED, the suicide vest, all the little delights that we've come to know so painfully well.
Do you have any news links that back up that assertion?
 
Hezbollah, which is an arm of the Iranian regime, started the trend of Islamist suicide bombings in service of terror groups back in the 80s. You may recall they killed a few Marines with the tactic, and by "a few", I of course mean 220. Not only did Iran heavily use suicide bombers in the Iraq Iran war, it used waves of children for that purpose. They had them charge minefields to clear them or wear bombs and bury themselves in shallow holes in roads before the tanks rolled over them in order to achieve more damaging kills. If you can't find any history of Iranian suicide bombing, you must not have looked at all.

"[m]artyrdom-seeking operations mark the highest point of the greatness of a nation and the peak of [its] epic." - Supreme Leader Ali Khamene'i.
Hezbollah are Lebanese and were created after Isreal invaded Lebanon in 1982. Claiming that Hezbollah are Iranian is like saying Osama Bin Laden was an American because he was helped by the CIA during the Soviet war in Afghanistan. And it was a group called Islamic Jihad who carried out the barracks bombings.

And show me the link where Iran used child suicide bombers in the Iran-Iraq war, please.
 
That's a good analysis.

But after the US senators sent letter to Iran warning them not to trust their own president and how the Iran minister responded....one has to wonder who the real irrational extremists are.

Mornin Moot.
hat.gif
They put the Letter out in the public first. It does give Cotton a boost as one of the future leaders. Naturally the left has played on it to do anything they can to get the coverage off of Hillary.


tmdsu15031220150313053626.jpg
 
Hezbollah are Lebanese and were created after Isreal invaded Lebanon in 1982. Claiming that Hezbollah are Iranian is like saying Osama Bin Laden was an American because he was helped by the CIA during the Soviet war in Afghanistan.

:doh No, it's like saying that USAID is American despite the fact that it works in other nations. Hezbollah was stood up by Iran, funded by Iran, receives direction from Iran, and acts on Iran's behalf. They utilized former scattered groups called Amalists for foot soldiers and Qods Force as enablers. It is an arm of the government in Tehran.

And it was a group called Islamic Jihad who carried out the barracks bombings.

1983 Beirut Barracks Bombing

...In 1982, the Islamic Republic of Iran established a base in the Syrian-controlled Bekaa Valley in Lebanon. That base is still operational today. From that base, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) "founded, financed, trained and equipped Hezbollah to operate as a proxy army" for Iran.[48] Some analysts believe the newly formed Islamic Republic of Iran was heavily involved in the bomb attacks and that a major factor leading it to orchestrate the attacks on the barracks was America's support for Iraq in the Iran–Iraq War and its extending of $2.5 billion in trade credit to Iraq while halting the shipments of arms to Iran.[49] A few weeks before the bombing, Iran warned that providing armaments to Iran's enemies would provoke retaliatory punishment.[Notes 1] On September 26, 1983, "the National Security Agency (NSA) intercepted an Iranian diplomatic communications message from the Iranian intelligence agency, the Ministry of Information and Security (MOIS)," to its ambassador, Ali Akbar Mohtashemi, in Damascus. The message directed the ambassador to "take spectacular action against the American Marines."[50] The intercepted message, dated September 26, would not be passed to the Marines until October 26: three days after the bombing.[51]

Much of what is now public knowledge of Iranian involvement, e.g., PETN purportedly supplied by Iran, the suicide bomber's name and nationality, etc., in the bombings was not revealed to the public until the 2003 trial, Peterson, et al v. Islamic Republic, et al.[10] Testimony by Admiral James "Ace" Lyon's, U.S.N. (Ret), and FBI forensic explosive investigator Danny A. Defenbaugh, plus a deposition by a Hezbollah operative named Mahmoud (a pseudonym) were particularly revealing.[52]...

Iran likes to use cut-outs for cut-outs. Islamic Jihad, was such an organization:

...Initially the group was described as "a mysterious group about which virtually nothing was known,"[2] one whose "only members" seemed to be the "anonymous callers" taking credit for the bombings, or one that simply didn't exist. After the MNF bombing, the New York Times reported that "Lebanese police sources, Western intelligence sources, Israeli Government sources and leading Shi'ite Moslem religious leaders in Beirut are all convinced that there is no such thing as Islamic Jihad," as an organization, no membership, no writings, etc.[3] ....

Wright has compared Islamic Jihad to the Black September wing of the Palestinian Fatah,[6] serving the function of providing its controlling organization, in this case Hezbollah, with some distance and plausible deniability from acts that might provoke retaliation or other problems.
...

Adam Shatz of The Nation magazine has described Islamic Jihad as "a precursor to Hezbollah, which did not yet officially exist" at the time of the bombings Islamic Jihad took credit for.[8] Jeffrey Goldberg says

Using various names, including the Islamic Jihad Organization and the Organization of the Oppressed on Earth, Hezbollah remained underground until 1985, when it published a manifesto condemning the West, and proclaiming, “.... Allah is behind us supporting and protecting us while instilling fear in the hearts of our enemies.”[9]​

A 2003 decision by an American court named Islamic Jihad as the name used by Hezbollah for its attacks in Lebanon, and parts of the Middle East, and Europe.[10] Just as Hezbollah used another name Islamic Resistance, or al-Muqawama al-Islamiyya, for its attacks against Israel.

By the mid-1980s Hizbollah leaders are reported to have admitted their involvement in the attacks and the nominal nature of "Islamic Jihad" - that it was merely a "telephone organisation,"[12][13] and[14] whose name was "used by those involved to disguise their true identity."...
 
POS said:
And show me the link where Iran used child suicide bombers in the Iran-Iraq war, please.

The Basij (pronounced Baseej), is an Islamic paramilitary force that was founded in 1979 by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to provide volunteers for "human wave" attacks in the Iran-Iraq War.

During this war, Iran severely lacked material resources to fight against the much better trained and equipped Iraqi army. Iraq had mined much of the areas that Iran needed to take. Iran had precious few armed vehicles and tanks to utilize and deploy. Rather than endanger their meager weapons and armor to destruction in face of Iraq counter attack, a new concept was created, the Basij, a special group of martyrs to be that would sacrifice their bodies by walking through the mine field, sparing the army from damage.

Tens of thousands of children were recruited for this special Basij project. Teenage boys as young as 12 were conscripted to serve as martyrs. They were trained to march straight into the enemy fire or through the enemy mine fields which they did wave after wave....

Iran is absolutely willing to engage in suicide-operations, to include with children.
 
World powers have been in talks to begin lifting UN sanctions against Iran if a deal is reached in upcoming nuclear discussions, media sources said. A UN resolution would make the deal binding, bypassing recently voiced objections in the US Senate.

http://rt.com/news/240277-iran-sanctions-lift-talks-us/
 
Okay we have one believer...oh, there's another one. Two believers. Do i see a third? Anyone? A third believer?

In what. Stop crying for gawds sake, nobodies worried about CR.
 
:doh No, it's like saying that USAID is American despite the fact that it works in other nations. Hezbollah was stood up by Iran, funded by Iran, receives direction from Iran, and acts on Iran's behalf. They utilized former scattered groups called Amalists for foot soldiers and Qods Force as enablers. It is an arm of the government in Tehran.



1983 Beirut Barracks Bombing



Iran likes to use cut-outs for cut-outs. Islamic Jihad, was such an organization:

Calling these groups part of Iran is pretty much calling a country like Isreal part of the US since they are funded by American taxpayers. Its a fallacious argument you are making. Hezbollah has an independent leadership and the origins of Islamic Jihad were never proven to be with Iran.

And Isreal funds terror groups in Iran and Syria as well and we initially started ISIS and helped out Osama Bin Laden. So its hypocrisy of the highest order.

Iran is absolutely willing to engage in suicide-operations, to include with children.

A Jewish magazine? Come on, thats a very biased source, it isnt MSM. No documented evidence but instead just pure hearsay.
 
Calling these groups part of Iran is pretty much calling a country like Isreal part of the US since they are funded by American taxpayers. Its a fallacious argument you are making. Hezbollah has an independent leadership and the origins of Islamic Jihad were never proven to be with Iran.

:doh did you cut out everything merely so you could respond with this? I demonstrated to you that Islamic Jihad was simply a name used by Hezbollah prior to it's public announcement, and that Hezbollah was not only founded and funded by Iran, but served as part of Iranian foreign policy. Hezbollah is an arm of the Iranian regime :shrug: No, it's not like calling "Israel" part of US foreign policy. It's like calling "USAID" part of US Foreign Policy.

And Isreal funds terror groups in Iran and Syria as well and we initially started ISIS and helped out Osama Bin Laden. So its hypocrisy of the highest order.

Ah never mind, my apologies. I assumed I was talking to someone of rationality. :) It's never worth wasting your time with the Truther types. But that explains the inability to assimilate new information. :) Have a good day.

A Jewish magazine? Come on, thats a very biased source,

Naturally. After all, they run all of the worlds' banks, and are just in it to get the US to invade Iran before the leadership there cunningly discovers irrefutable proof of the Great Holocaust Fraud. You can't trust 'em.
 
Last edited:
:doh did you cut out everything merely so you could respond with this? I demonstrated to you that Islamic Jihad was simply a name used by Hezbollah prior to it's public announcement, and that Hezbollah was not only founded and funded by Iran, but served as part of Iranian foreign policy.
Um, no you didnt prove that. In fact your own wikipedia article doesnt support what youre saying. A US grand jury indicted a Lebanese Shia as the one responsible and no other proof has been found conclusive. Youre grasping at straws.

Hezbollah is an arm of the Iranian regime No, it's not like calling "Israel" part of US foreign policy. It's like calling "USAID" part of US Foreign Policy.
Hezbollah is independent and it is composed of Lebanese Shias, not Iranians. Yes, they are supplied by Iran but they have their own leadership. USAID is directly under US leadership and is composed of Americans so your comparisons are dubious.

Ah never mind, my apologies. I assumed I was talking to someone of rationality. It's never worth wasting your time with the Truther types. But that explains the inability to assimilate new information. Have a good day.
I can say the same thing about you and your hatred for anything Muslim and naivety of US foreign policy. Have a good day as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom