• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama emailed Clinton at private address, didn’t know ‘details’ of account

pbrauer said:
She didn't admit to doing anything wrong.
Click to expand...

So what she didn't admit to it.....as soon as she was done speaking. All this was dumped for release.

Now we know she was hacked by someone overseas. A Foreigner. Did you miss those Regulations and laws that were put up about receiving and sending info?

Newsources overseas have copies of Benghazi Emails. Classified Information.....do you know what that means?
 
tres borrachos said:
I don't know. I'm guessing. Most executives do NOT delegate their email, especially sensitive emails. If you worked for any organizations where executives delegated sensitive emails to Administrative Assistants, I'd like to know more about that. I never in 35 years of working heard of such a thing.

I don't know if Obama knew what her email address was or not. He should have - I know where all of my emails are going. But if he didn't that doesn't matter either. I have a lot of issues with Obama, and that isn't one of them.
Click to expand...

On that we agree. This is a silly made up bit of nonsense.
 
Fearandloathing said:
You can't prove a negative.....

show us any indication he has.....

no guessing OK?

These hypothetical "reasons" dear leader could never be a wrongdoer of any kind, only convince me Obama is a fool and an incompetent. I have no idea what technology "companies" you have worked for, but no executive I have dealt with uses a blind for his communications. Like any politician he would have aids to deal with constituency business, but him not knowing where his replies were going is pretty lame. he learned about on TV and now he never looked at the addresses....AFTER having had the rules changed SPECIFICALLY for this reason.

At best he is negligent.
Click to expand...

Since you asked -

Digital Equipment Corporation,
Compaq,
Hewlet Packard,

Securities Industry Automation Corp (SIAC)
Societe General
New York Stock Exchange.



Knowing that his reply was going to Hillary Clinton and knowing which of her email addresses they are going are not the same thing. When I send an email using my employer's email system I type the name of the person I'm sending it to. I don't know the actual email address associated with that name. I don't need to know. I just know it's going to Joe Smith.

And the point of all this simply Obama's explanation is not implausible. Could he be lying? Certainly. But there is no reason to assume so based on his statement that he didn't know where the email was going.
 
Last edited:
US Conservative said:
I didn't assume anything-the presidents own spokesperson says OBAMA emailed HILLARY.

We now know that Hillary NEVER used a govt email server.
Click to expand...

You are assuming Obama knew that. There is no basis for that assumption.
 
Gaius46 said:
You are assuming Obama knew that. There is no basis for that assumption.
Click to expand...

Yeah, BO knew it.....due to Gawker contacting Josh earnest in 2013 over Hillary's use of a non governmental source.
 
US Conservative said:
She just held one, all she said was she should have had a state dept email address.
Click to expand...

Yes, and I'll happily eat my words after I heard Hillary dig her heels in to the fact she selected what emails to delete, that her server will remain private and that she couldn't figure out how to add a second email address to her phone. :)

Was interesting how she laid out her points, she was asking us to trust her....:lamo
 
Gaius46 said:
Since you asked -

Digital Equipment Corporation,
Compaq,
Hewlet Packard,

Securities Industry Automation Corp (SIAC)
Societe General
New York Stock Exchange.



Knowing that his reply was going to Hillary Clinton and knowing which of her email addresses they are going are not the same thing. When I send an email using my employer's email system I type the name of the person I'm sending it to. I don't know the actual email address associated with that name. I don't need to know. I just know it's going to Joe Smith.

And the point of all this simply Obama's explanation is not implausible. Could he be lying? Certainly. But there is no reason to assume so based on his statement that he didn't know where the email was going.
Click to expand...

I also worked for DEC..


Have a nice day
 
Meadowlark said:
Yes, and I'll happily eat my words after I heard Hillary dig her heels in to the fact she selected what emails to delete, that her server will remain private and that she couldn't figure out how to add a second email address to her phone. :)

Was interesting how she laid out her points, she was asking us to trust her....:lamo
Click to expand...

That wasn't geared towards all Americans, but rather her supporters who heard all they need to continue supporting her.
 
Gaius46 said:
You are assuming Obama knew that. There is no basis for that assumption.
Click to expand...

Of course he didn't know it.

He lives in a bubble of golf courses and the TV they let him watch.

I mean what scandal/issue has he not learned about from TV?

And like Watergate and arms for hostages, we will see what is 'silly'....so far it's been Obama squirming to stay out of the ****
 
Fearandloathing said:
Of course he didn't know it.

He lives in a bubble of golf courses and the TV they let him watch.

I mean what scandal/issue has he not learned about from TV?

And like Watergate and arms for hostages, we will see what is 'silly'....so far it's been Obama squirming to stay out of the ****
Click to expand...

That should be the statement affixed under his official portrait and bust.

"I just heard about this on television"
 
US Conservative said:
President Obama communicated with Hillary Rodham Clinton via email but didn’t know the “details” of how his secretary of state was using a private, off-the-books email address, the White House said Monday.

“They did have the occasion to email one another. … He was not aware of the details of how that email address and how that server had been set up or how Secretary Clinton and her team were planning to comply with the Federal Records Act,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters. “The president did email with Secretary Clinton. I assume he recognized the email he was emailing back to.”

gop-2016-the-learning-curvejpeg-0797e_c0-134-2658-1683_s561x327.jpg


Read more: Obama emailed Clinton at private address, didn't know 'details' of account - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

So Obama said recently he just found out about this, but he emailed her. Im betting there is more to this.
Click to expand...

Seems we find out lots of officials have done so. I don't understand why they aren't issued a .gov address and REQUIRED to use it for ALL business.
 
Montecresto said:
Seems we find out lots of officials have done so. I don't understand why they aren't issued a .gov address and REQUIRED to use it for ALL business.
Click to expand...

They are, in fact Hillary fired a staffer for using a private email.

And while there are a few officials that have done this (most rightly punished when illegal), I'd hardly call it "lots". Can you name another official in the Obama administration doing this?
 
US Conservative said:
They are, in fact Hillary fired a staffer for using a private email.

And while there are a few officials that have done this (most rightly punished when illegal), I'd hardly call it "lots". Can you name another official in the Obama administration doing this?
Click to expand...

I would imagine right now you'd find none.


POLITICSNEWS
High-Ranking Federal Officials’ History of Using Personal Email for Government Business
http://dailysignal.com/2015/03/08/h...ory-using-personal-email-government-business/
 
Last edited:
Meadowlark said:
Yes, and I'll happily eat my words after I heard Hillary dig her heels in to the fact she selected what emails to delete, that her server will remain private and that she couldn't figure out how to add a second email address to her phone. :)

Was interesting how she laid out her points, she was asking us to trust her....:lamo
Click to expand...



And we should, you know. God grant that anyone be judged according to their deeds.

I mean, I trust her. I trust er to weasel and worm her way out of squeakers, that like Bill she will go martyr at the drop of a question mark. We can trust her not to give us the whole truth at any time, and like her former adversary, we can trust her to put her interests ahead of pretty much anything.

And we can trust her to hang in, fighting, clawing and kicking all the while she lines her pockets.

In that we [can] trust.
 
Montecresto said:
Private e-mails don't have the protections against hackers and scrutiny that government ones do. If for nothing other than national security, one is lots.

Private email use a source of friction in many statehouses
Private email use a source of friction in many statehouses | Politics | Journal Gazette
Click to expand...

I know they dont-but hillary was more concerned with preventing her own emails from coming into contact with investigative committees that she took the risk anyway.
 
US Conservative said:
I know they dont-but hillary was more concerned with preventing her own emails from coming into contact with investigative committees that she took the risk anyway.
Click to expand...

Hey, I'm not defending Hillary Clinton on this. I'm just pointing out she's neither the first or only one. Here's the deal, it ALL needs to stop TODAY. For the sake of our national security, if nothing else. Btw, maybe this will be the thing that derails her. Can we only hope?
 
Gaius46 said:
Since you asked -

Digital Equipment Corporation,
Compaq,
Hewlet Packard,

Securities Industry Automation Corp (SIAC)
Societe General
New York Stock Exchange.



Knowing that his reply was going to Hillary Clinton and knowing which of her email addresses they are going are not the same thing. When I send an email using my employer's email system I type the name of the person I'm sending it to. I don't know the actual email address associated with that name. I don't need to know. I just know it's going to Joe Smith.

And the point of all this simply Obama's explanation is not implausible. Could he be lying? Certainly. But there is no reason to assume so based on his statement that he didn't know where the email was going.
Click to expand...
That only works if either the email is in your address book or you are on the same server, such as Exchange or similar. They weren't on the same server (HC used her own), and the address would have to be manually added to any address book. So at some point BO saw and maybe even typed her email address. How that didn't raise flags is a mystery. In the medical profession, for instance, one could be in serious HIPPA violations sending certain information to an outside email address, and that's not even classified or a national security issue. So, we're left to conclude they both are either extraordinarily sloppy about sensitive information or they are lying.

Didn't Nixon try something similar with "his" tapes?
 
polgara said:
Greetings, US Conservative. :2wave:

There was one statement she made that puzzles me. She said she has no plans to turn over her personal email server, despite calls from both Republicans and Democrats to do so. "The server contains personal communications from my husband and me. The server will remain private." Uh huh. She's establishing the rules under which she will cooperate in this investigation? You can print copies of e-mails if you wish to keep them, and then delete them if they're so private that others shouldn't see them. This just doesn't make sense, because it sounds like a red herring to imply it's a "sanctity of communications in marriage" thing!
Click to expand...



This is where she is deceitful.

She is implying that because they are personal in nature that they cannot be examined. As an attorney she knows that to be false. There are several ways in which they can; one is by 'Amicus curiae', or friend of the court, an agreed to third party who will sift through them and determine what is and what is not private, any disagreements arbitrated by the court itself. In that way justice is seen to be done, you know that other part of law, law makers forget about?

In any event, she becomes no less unattractive with the deception. I am beginning to understand why Bill ****ed around.
 
US Conservative said:
They are, in fact Hillary fired a staffer for using a private email.
Click to expand...

I don't think so. The person you are referring to was the Ambassador to Kenya and he wasn't fired. He resigned shortly before the release of an audit report essentially calling him out for being worthless, seemingly spending most of his time cooling his heels on the public dime, insubordination, and a total lack of confidence and respect (from his own staff) that he could do the job.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom