Lol - and I wasn't even claiming that that's what happened in this particular instance, as far as we know they were the only two people in the locker room at the time. I was making a point about the policy, it wasn't intended to be taken literally about any specific instance.you were saying?
Yes Bodi nice try . . . on your part but it was a swing and a miss buddy! lol
sooo did you get that software to work, when do i get to see these masterpieces your daughter did?
Actually, if you read the article again, you'll see that the only evidence that there were other complaints comes from the woman who complained. No employee of PF's told the journalist that others had complained. It was the woman who complained who said a PF employee told her that others had complained
The point was that PF wasn't doing anyone any favors in how they chose to implement this policy of theirs. The fact that they don't tell people about it up front is asinine. They can't really expect that if a very masculine, obviously male person walks into the women's locker room, that the current inhabitants will simply look to the "no judgment zone" words painted on the wall, conclude that the guy must be a trans woman, and simply go about their business. That's ridiculous. The much more likely scenario is that the trans person is going to startle/scare most women, and in return be the constant subject of "what the hell are you doing in here" stares or even verbal challenges. Whether or not you're a trans person, the manner in which they've implemented this policy just sucks.
You have evidence other members were complaining about her? lol please provide that now because there is none.
Wait, what's this? Another news report from the "Land of Make-Believe"?
Even more important, when you try to make these claims in the future, be sure you preface them with "what I wish happened, because I have ZERO evidence to support it, is..."