- Joined
- Dec 27, 2014
- Messages
- 59,393
- Reaction score
- 38,951
- Location
- Best Coast Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Oh like "inspections" have worked before.
Time to get real, Obama's ideas have all been tried, there is no negotiating with Iran, they will not obey the rules and they cannot ever be trusted for their word.
But claiming Bibi is lying in the face of thousands, thousands of lies after lies after bull**** after more lies is so ****ing lame as to be laughable. FFS you guys are so ****ing rattled by Netanyahu you are now claiming a decorated war hero is a "coward".
That's beyond desperate. The Obama camp has lost all concept of right and wrong. When you try to throw and ally under a bus with false and misleading charges of lying and being a coward, that's when I stop listening. The Obama camp is so devoid of a moral compass they will eat their young for a headline....
I know I want Canada out of Iraq NOW. Not because I disagree with the war, but I do not want my country in any association with the United States while Obama is in power, his obvious incompetence will cost Canadian lives and we will ultimately be thrown under a bus like the slithering misfits who support this horrible waste of skin you chose for president. If a mere speech can result in this kind of bull****, then it's time for Canada and the world to walk away until you elect someone sane.
FFS, Israel is an ally. Who the **** is the enemy in Obama's world? It appears to be in this order 1) Republicans, 2) Israel, 3) Canada, and so on, while ISIS are really nice people who just need a little understanding and jobs....if you don't mind the screams of people burning alive, and piles of heads missing bodies.
Have fun with the bus.....it will get really ****ing lonely though as nations say "**** you"
Glad you got that off your chest. Clearly bothering you.
I never ever stated, nor implied Bibi was a coward.
I stated he had lied for decades about Iran being near to a bomb. Bibi has Israels interests at heart - Not ours and he would throw whoever under the appropriate bus as needed.
Next - The Deal
If the deal does not have intrusive intersections - then no deal- let the Iranian economy crash- increase sanctions. Always my position
If the deal is a good one, then it must include intrusive inspections. Always my position
Sanctions are then suspended.
If problems arise due to non compliance they are then ready to implemented and can be within a very short time, if they are suspended.
Next- Israel- Palestinian peace deal
Iran is a key player.
If not, a deal starts to coalesce, Hezbollah or Hamas starts another war, no peace deal.
If Turkey and Saudi want regime change in Syria - let them do it.
Next- Obama, call him what you will, inherited 2 wars, the world community was against the US due to the Iraq invasion.
US citizens were tired of 2 wars that cost thousands of US soldiers lives, and the civilian death counts, and estimated at over US 4 trillion.
Next - Congress implemented sanctions, that were signed of by the President in office at that time.
New sanctions if a bad deal, will have enough votes to override a Presidential Veto.
So where do you stand on if no deal? Continue sanctions or start a limited bombing campaign?