• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton Tweets That She Wants Her Email Released To The Public

zimmer said:
Hillary Clinton is simply not to be trusted or believed. Her history of lies, deceptions and amnesia are too long to trust her.

I suggest Hillary release all her emails from her server to the Benghazi Committee, and to the State Dept. Personal and otherwise. Everything. She skirted the system, she is untrustworthy... as far as I'm concerned that was the default SoS server... and the contents are our property.
Click to expand...

B. Hussein Obama is a damned lying collectivist, too, but that didn't keep the American people, in their wisdom, from electing him. Twice. I think this broad-beamed hag's worst problem politically is not her brazen, habitual lying--people have come to expect leftists to be liars--but her age and suspicions about her health.
 
zimmer said:
And to think... this was discovered by a hacker. A hacker.

You don't think the Chinese and Russians, NK or others haven't penetrated her server or the accounts of others that have been in contact with her?
Click to expand...

Those people are prolific hackers, no question.
 
Cardinal said:
So as you don't trust that her email collection consists of every email you'd like to see, what do you suggest?
Click to expand...

Following the rule/law that required the use of an official server in the first place. This is not some accident that HRC suffered - she purposefully chose to create this situation. If you trust her then why not just take her at her word? If you do not trust her then she has had ample time (over two years) to doctor the "official" archives she is now offering up.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Following the rule/law that required the use of an official server in the first place. This is not some accident that HRC suffered - she purposefully chose to create this situation. If you trust her then why not just take her at her word? If you do not trust her then she has had ample time (over two years) to doctor the "official" archives she is now offering up.
Click to expand...


Apparently just like Colin Powell's staff revealed. Oh....

ttwtt78640 said:
Precisely why the rule/law required the use of a server controlled by a third party. If we could simply trust these folks then we would not need to see their Emails in the first place. ;)
Click to expand...

:roll: Except when it's your party though right?
 
tres borrachos said:
I can't tell the government what to do?

I think she should make them public or understand that she has proven herself to be dishonest, and not complain when her opponents use this against her (and they will - on both sides).

If I were John Kerry, I would require that she turn all of her emails over, not just the ones she thinks are okay for their consumption.

In the meantime, she's getting hammered in the press by everyone, even the left leaning media (not the partisan idiots at Media Matters, but they go way back, so they aren't exactly impartial to her). And on boars ike this. And she deserves it. The rules do apply to her, whether she believes so or not.
Click to expand...

Well you can certainly demand anything you want. But if you and others don't trust her to cede to those demands or that all the relevant emails even exist (or are undoctored), then what do you suggest be done? Send in a SWAT team? Bury her up to her neck and cover her head in honey and ants?
 
Cardinal said:
Well you can certainly demand anything you want. But if you and others don't trust her to cede to those demands or that all the relevant emails even exist (or are undoctored), or that what do you suggest be done? Send in a SWAT team? Bury up to her neck and cover her head in honey and ants?
Click to expand...

Huh? I didn't demand anything. What are you talking about?

I gave suggestions and even said "If I were John Kerry", "I think she should make them public", etc. Did you not understand my post?
 
matchlight said:
B. Hussein Obama is a damned lying collectivist, too, but that didn't keep the American people, in their wisdom, from electing him. Twice. I think this broad-beamed hag's worst problem politically is not her brazen, habitual lying--people have come to expect leftists to be liars--but her age and suspicions about her health.
Click to expand...

Obama would never been elected had it not been the press running cover. The defining moment of it was Joe the Plumber asking a question, letting Obama run his mouth uninterrupted, and in the process he revealed his lean was as many of us knew... socialist in nature... "spread the wealth around".

Then the full force of the Obama Media attacked Joe.

Hillary is shrill, corrupt, and Bill ... who pals with pedofiles ... well... the combined decades of abuse has taken its toll. The Dem power holders obviously seem to want to dump her... this is their excuse.
 
tres borrachos said:
No, I don't. I agree with what they were saying on MSNBC this morning. She parses words and she thinks the rules don't apply to her. But that doesn't mean she should be given a pass.

Apparently her boss' Administration kept telling her to stop using her personal email address. I also think she's incredibly foolish if she didn't know that she shouldn't be conducting business on behalf of the USA from a personal email account on her private server. In my company that's grounds for termination. Probably a lot of other companies as well. I can imagine that Obama is not very happy with her right now, nor should he be.
Click to expand...



Oh, I think Obama is smiling a broad smile. What does he have to lose in this? He doesn't have to run again, he still has Teflon in him, and it's all about her.....

Anything in those emails, unless they reveal him to be hands on Benghazi, don't touch him. Benghazi was all hers. He can and will throw her under the bus and then offer up Liz Warren as "clean'.....

To whom these emails are sent is a huge factor. In my realm, usually companies won't respond to a personal email account when it is business to business to business....I wonder who was in on this back door communications and why....

There is strong prime facie evidence of an attempt to withhold public information, possible conspiracy charges if there was also an attempt to deceive.
 
tres borrachos said:
Huh? I didn't demand anything. What are you talking about?

I gave suggestions and even said "If I were John Kerry", "I think she should make them public", etc. Did you not understand my post?
Click to expand...

What you want and how you want it to happen aren't gelling.

People in this thread...

1)Don't trust Clinton to deliver the relevant emails.
2)Don't trust Clinton to deliver emails that have already been deleted (QED).
3)And if she does hand over her emails, they don't trust her to have not doctored them in some way.

Can you see how that doesn't leave very much room left? In consideration of points 1-3, what do you want, and how do you want it to happen?
 
Hatuey said:
... So... you don't want to see what's in the e-mails?
Click to expand...

They've been scrubbed already anyway. Hillary is a crook, but she's a smart crook. She knows what she's doing. She cleaned up Bill's messes in Arkansas and DC and some of hers as well. Whitewater was mostly her. Not to mention Vince Foster.
 
Cardinal said:
What you want and how you want it to happen aren't gelling.

People in this thread...

1)Don't trust Clinton to deliver the relevant emails.
2)Don't trust Clinton to deliver emails that have already been deleted (QED).
3)And if she does hand over her emails, they don't trust her to have not doctored them in some way.

Can you see how that doesn't leave very much room left? In consideration of points 1-3, what do you want, and how do you want it to happen?
Click to expand...

What I want is for her to release all of her emails to the people who are demanding that she do just that. It's transparency and she worked for the citizens of the USA.

What do what other people posted in this thread have to do with me? Ask them. You asked me what I think should happen, not what I think should happen based on poster x saying that her emails may be doctored, etc.. I never said they were.
 
clownboy said:
They've been scrubbed already anyway. Hillary is a crook, but she's a smart crook. She knows what she's doing. She cleaned up Bill's messes in Arkansas and DC and some of hers as well. Whitewater was mostly her. Not to mention Vince Foster.
Click to expand...

So what do you suggest happen now? Everyone can go home?
 
tres borrachos said:
What I want is for her to release all of her emails to the people who are demanding that she do just that. It's transparency and she worked for the citizens of the USA.

What do what other people posted in this thread have to do with me? Ask them. You asked me what I think should happen, not what I think should happen based on poster x saying that her emails may be doctored, etc.. I never said they were.
Click to expand...

You responded to me based on my question to another person.

You don't trust her to release the pertinent emails, but you trust her to not doctor the ones she releases, which she will not do because you don't trust her to do that? And what if the ones that would incriminate her do not exist? Were they necessarily deleted or did they never exist to begin with?
 
Hatuey said:
Provide evidence. I'll wait.
Click to expand...

Good luck with that. Again, Hillary has a long history of making evidence disappear. Take a look at the Rose Law Firm and her dealings there.
 
clownboy said:
Good luck with that. Again, Hillary has a long history of making evidence disappear. Take a look at the Rose Law Firm and her dealings there.
Click to expand...

Do you or do you not have evidence that the e-mails were altered in any shape or form? Yes or no answer.
 
Cardinal said:
So what do you suggest happen now? Everyone can go home?
Click to expand...

No, the congress is duty bound to pursue. I just don't see them getting her on this. She's such an experienced crook she'll likely only be caught out by history after she's gone, if then.
 
pragmatic said:
Sounds like a pretty smart move by the Hillary camp to me.......
Click to expand...

She obviously thought so too at the time, expecting the media to run cover for her if ever discovered.

What I don't get it how corrupt is State? Where was the one person in that festering cesspool to leak this illegality?
 
Hatuey said:
Do you or do you not have evidence that the e-mails were altered in any shape or form? Yes or no answer.
Click to expand...

There's a third answer just for you Hatuey, but I'm too polite to use it here.
 
Cardinal said:
You responded to me based on my question to another person.

You don't trust her to release the pertinent emails, but you trust her to not doctor the ones she releases, which she will not do because you don't trust her to do that? And what if the ones that would incriminate her do not exist? Were they necessarily deleted or did they never exist to begin with?
Click to expand...

You'll have to ask those posters who said that. Sorry, I can't help you. I keep posting the same thing, which is that she hasn't released her emails because the State Department has no authority to release emails from her private server. That's a fact, not an opinion.
 
clownboy said:
Good luck with that. Again, Hillary has a long history of making evidence disappear. Take a look at the Rose Law Firm and her dealings there.
Click to expand...

Look at what they had Sandy Burgler do. Steal docs from the National Archives pertinent to 911, and then destroy them.
 
clownboy said:
There's a third answer just for you Hatuey, but I'm too polite to use it here.
Click to expand...

It's now clear that you don't have any evidence that they were "scrubbed". Stop wasting precious server space by replying with your baseless claims.
 
I'd rather read Bill's emails. Or even better an internet history report. :lol: Now that would be entertaining.
 
Hatuey said:
It's now clear that you don't have any evidence that they were "scrubbed". Stop wasting precious server space by replying with your baseless claims.
Click to expand...

Go stalk someone else. No one has evidence, that's the point of scrubbing in the first place. Are you that in the bag for Hillary or is she just any port in the storm for your stalking.
 
clownboy said:
Go stalk someone else.
Click to expand...

You replied to me. Get your story straight before you go accusing people of stalking.

No one has evidence
Click to expand...

No, you don't have evidence. That is the only fact we know so far.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom