• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

So you still refuse to answer the question. Sweet! Whether or not it's already happening is irrelevant .... I want to know if you support it or not. Still won't answer a very simple question?

What are you hiding?

Here it is for you ONCE AGAIN. If you can't get this **** you're hopeless. I don't give a ****. I'm not supposed to give a ****. In the profession I am in you have rules, ethics etc you follow. End of story. You don't care about if you want to or not. It's part of the job and is there for ethical and legal reasons. If there's an investigation into someone else dealing with these rules I don't give a ****. I worry about myself and my own ethics and following the rules/laws. If I suspect someone else isn't you do what is proper and that is it and leave it to the people who do the investigations. That's it. I've wasted a damn hour on you.
 
Here it is for you ONCE AGAIN. If you can't get this **** you're hopeless. I don't give a ****. I'm not supposed to give a ****. In the profession I am in you have rules, ethics etc you follow. End of story. You don't care about if you want to or not. It's part of the job and is there for ethical and legal reasons. If there's an investigation into someone else dealing with these rules I don't give a ****. I worry about myself and my own ethics and following the rules/laws. If I suspect someone else isn't you do what is proper and that is it and leave it to the people who do the investigations. That's it. I've wasted a damn hour on you.

You refuse to answer..... so precious!! :lamo
 
You refuse to answer..... so precious!! :lamo

No, I refuse to tell you what you want to hear. I'm the one in damn law not you. I told you the answer from my experience with it and how I was trained etc. If that's not satisfying to you tough ****.
 
You refuse to answer..... so precious!! :lamo

Precious?

...Preciousssss?

The-One-Ring.jpg
 
No, I refuse to tell you what you want to hear. I'm the one in damn law not you. I told you the answer from my experience with it. If that's not satisfying to you tough ****.

No you refuse to pick a position, proving my assertion as to your motivation being here at DP. You're answer isn't an answer. You're in the law like I'm in porn.

Have a nice night!
 
MEETINGS AND EVENTS
Short-quoted for band-width.
Since I know you from before DP, just noting how much fun you righties are having with Warren and the new poster.

There are plenty of DEM strategists calling Clinton out for an explanation.
Righties have already forgotten that Maddow and O'Donnell broke the email story Monday night, without defending her.
Followed by the New York Times trashing her the next two days and now HuffPo.
I'm actually seeing more defense on CNN rather than MSNBC, which highlights these emails each hour.

You would enjoy watching FOX/Baier at 6:00 Eastern--I never miss it when I'm at home unless there's a big sports event.

The next big DEM candidate is ex-Gov. O'Malley.
This was confirmed in my mind when Van Hollen chose to run for Mikulski's open Senate seat, with O'Malley bowing out .
 
Some people seeing your description of yourself as a communist might think that says a lot about yours. But it is completely consistent with your willingness to defend Mrs. Clinton.

So because I don't think like you about **** that's now "defending." You live in a black and white world. I guess "I don't give a ****" is now defending.

Nope. The party you mentioned posted that stuff on their website. I just copied it. I wish Bernie all the luck in the world in his efforts.

And that they're having an EVENT. They have goddamn times and locations where they meet for these events.

No you refuse to pick a position, proving my assertion as to your motivation being here at DP. You're answer isn't an answer. You're in the law like I'm in porn.

Have a nice night!

Like, your motivation for being here? Why is it only my motivation for being here is brought up? I see you constantly in other threads I choose to go in spewing the exact same conservative right wing crap. Yet, only my motivations are questioned. And you've barely ever talked to me. I've haven't even been here a week yet and I've only been in a handful of threads. I gave you my position. You just can't deal with it because it's not black and white. That's all your side does on this site. You have to have everything wrapped up in a nice little box of one side or the other. No one can ever be different and have other thought process. It's always if you're not this well you have to be that. That's not how the world works. You think you debate here? You don't. You just repeat right wing talking point trash I can hear on any FM radio station here. That's not debating at all. You wouldn't know a real debate if one was fixed for you on a dinner plate. All you know how to do is pick a side and argue for the conservative side where you are spewing the same **** as every other conservative on here. You all bicker the same crap and call it "debate." A "debate" is where you have an independent mind and can have all sorts of different views on something. Not wrapped up in a little bow and told to pick something so you can argue your position. You want me to say I'm against it so you can call me all sorts of **** and do the typical "lefties have no respect for rule of law!!" bull**** that you all have been doing for years.

Save the crap.
 
Short-quoted for band-width.
Since I know you from before DP, just noting how much fun you righties are having with Warren and the new poster.

There are plenty of DEM strategists calling Clinton out for an explanation.
Righties have already forgotten that Maddow and O'Donnell broke the email story Monday night, without defending her.
Followed by the New York Times trashing her the next two days and now HuffPo.
I'm actually seeing more defense on CNN rather than MSNBC, which highlights these emails each hour.

You would enjoy watching FOX/Baier at 6:00 Eastern--I never miss it when I'm at home unless there's a big sports event.

The next big DEM candidate is ex-Gov. O'Malley.
This was confirmed in my mind when Van Hollen chose to run for Mikulski's open Senate seat, with O'Malley bowing out .

I know it's unfair, but I have to claim a little latitude from time to time for the sheer fun of it. I think another democrat candidate will emerge beyond O'Malley. It remains to be seen who that might be, but not too many thought Obama was much of anything before 2006. We'll see. I do watch Baier - that's about all I watch at Fox, and it is right leaning, but it's reasonable and informative with good comment. Krauthammer is dour, but nonetheless likeable and representative - also very good at times. The rest of the panel is usually a liberal leaning commentator sandwiched by Krauthammer and another slightly less strident conservative. I do watch Wolf Blitzer sometimes simply because I like his deer in the headlights look.
 
Like, your motivation for being here?
Oh my motivation is to out posters and to find out if they are legit and honest in what they think and espouse or if they are liars and ideologues vomiting BS on the forum. It's my way of gauging who and what they are for future reference. When someone like yourself, cannot answer a simple question it's very simple to make that judgement call.

Why is it only my motivation for being here is brought up?
Because questioned my motivation for supporting the investigation.


I see you constantly in other threads I choose to go in spewing the exact same conservative right wing crap.
Some of my views are conservative, some are libertarian.

And you've barely ever talked to me. I've haven't even been here a week yet and I've only been in a handful of threads. I gave you my position. You just can't deal with it because it's not black and white.
Debate is taking a position, when you fail to do so and spew it's like I already said.
That's all your side does on this site. You have to have everything wrapped up in a nice little box of one side or the other. No one can ever be different and have other thought process. It's always if you're not this well you have to be that. That's not how the world works. You think you debate here? You don't.
You're going to preach to me about debate? LOL!! I've probably forgotten more about the subject than you've ever known. I've been doing this a very long time and since you cannot take a position on a subject it's ironic you're preaching to me about what is and is not debate. Because you went and got a low level degree as a paralegal you're now some qualitative source on law? Gimme a break. What you're doing is projecting your inability to debate onto me - it's a common problem with newbies who think they know but don't....

You just repeat right wing talking point trash I can hear on any FM radio station here. That's not debating at all.

Save the crap.

No I think I won't - that you can't stand to hear facts and truth about a subject is something I'll be going out of my way to remind you about. Here's a tip: You need to seriously figure out how to work this forum thing because I will point out any of your future lies, inconsistencies, and outright BS at every opportunity. In fact, I LOVE doing it and when you make it easy like you did in this thread, it's truly a pleasure. If you can't pick a position, I'll point that out as well.... so figure out what you want to do. MMkay?
 
Oh my motivation is to out posters and to find out if they are legit and honest in what they think and espouse or if they are liars and ideologues vomiting BS on the forum. It's my way of gauging who and what they are for future reference. When someone like yourself, cannot answer a simple question it's very simple to make that judgement call.

Because questioned my motivation for supporting the investigation.


Some of my views are conservative, some are libertarian.

Debate is taking a position, when you fail to do so and spew it's like I already said.
You're going to preach to me about debate? LOL!! I've probably forgotten more about the subject than you've ever known. I've been doing this a very long time and since you cannot take a position on a subject it's ironic you're preaching to me about what is and is not debate. Because you went and got a low level degree as a paralegal you're now some qualitative source on law? Gimme a break. What you're doing is projecting your inability to debate onto me - it's a common problem with newbies who think they know but don't....



No I think I won't - that you can't stand to hear facts and truth about a subject is something I'll be going out of my way to remind you about. Here's a tip: You need to seriously figure out how to work this forum thing because I will point out any of your future lies, inconsistencies, and outright BS at every opportunity. In fact, I LOVE doing it and when you make it easy like you did in this thread, it's truly a pleasure. If you can't pick a position, I'll point that out as well.... so figure out what you want to do. MMkay?


Get over yourself. And fyi the paralegal field is a rising one these days. Lawyers can't do **** without us.

You wouldn't know honesty for ****. There was never a debate in the first place. All you do is post right wing garbage and call it "debating." And if this is your "pleasure" in life that truly is pathetic.
 
I know it's unfair, but I have to claim a little latitude from time to time for the sheer fun of it. I think another democrat candidate will emerge beyond O'Malley. It remains to be seen who that might be, but not too many thought Obama was much of anything before 2006. We'll see. I do watch Baier - that's about all I watch at Fox, and it is right leaning, but it's reasonable and informative with good comment. Krauthammer is dour, but nonetheless likeable and representative - also very good at times. The rest of the panel is usually a liberal leaning commentator sandwiched by Krauthammer and another slightly less strident conservative. I do watch Wolf Blitzer sometimes simply because I like his deer in the headlights look.

Watching the All-Star panel is getting easier for me, including Krauthammer.
Hayes is calming down, Juan is good, and the left-of-center guy yesterday was very well-spoken and went tough on HRC.

Besides the email pounding, which will now start each Special Report until the next election,
the thing I like the most is how fast-paced the first 35 minutes is and how many big issues they get to, usually without snark.
I wonder how well they'll speak of the good economic news today. :lamo

The biggest story in my mind right now is Iran helping Iraq against Daesh and its future ramifications.
Sen. Menendez has a real problem with the Feds, which broke today.

As a Politico, I'm enjoying the newly drawn lines in the GOP House feud, between the Freedom Caucus and the AAN(elites).
I don't like calling Freedom Caucus leader Jim Jordan a far-rightist, though he would probably accept that.

Jordan's a former NCAA D1 Wrestling champion, my main high school sport even now as a retired teacher and active coach,
and he has a son and a nephew at the same weight class in D1 that are highly rated--I hope to get to see him at Nationals .
 
Last edited:
Get over yourself. And fyi the paralegal field is a rising one these days. Lawyers can't do **** without us.

You wouldn't know honesty for ****. There was never a debate in the first place. All you do is post right wing garbage and call it "debating." And if this is your "pleasure" in life that truly is pathetic.

What do all those asterisks stand for? Are they some arcane debating terms, maybe, that you think we who lack your preternatural wisdom about debate would not understand?
 
Get over yourself. And fyi the paralegal field is a rising one these days. Lawyers can't do **** without us.
You've got an associates degree anyone can get online - it's no big deal and is the lowest legal function ever. Talk about getting over yourself (if that is what you even do).

You wouldn't know honesty for ****. There was never a debate in the first place. All you do is post right wing garbage and call it "debating." And if this is your "pleasure" in life that truly is pathetic.
All I need to know is you full of it - it's obvious from our little exchange and you've done better than my expectations since I expected your views to be drivel and nonsense but vitriolic spewing ideology based on nothing is what your posts provide. Way to push the envelope of stupid! Kudos!
 
Oh, I see. So, people have to die before you want to help them. That's really sad. :2no4: But once they're dead well you'd say "oops can't help them now they're dead" and you won't want to help anyone who is starving.

Let me repeat:

There has never been a reported case of a person starving to death in the US for lack of food. None, sip zero, nada. Unless they purposely starved themselves, in that case they commuted suicide, or were held without food and in that case that would be murder.

Now you go on to say we must stop suicides and murders. I think we are already trying to do that. All this BS about children dying of starvation is Bull ****. There has never been a reported case of that happening in the US. Period.. However I challenge you to prove me wrong.
 
You've got an associates degree anyone can get online - it's no big deal and is the lowest legal function ever. Talk about getting over yourself (if that is what you even do).

All I need to know is you full of it - it's obvious from our little exchange and you've done better than my expectations since I expected your views to be drivel and nonsense but vitriolic spewing ideology based on nothing is what your posts provide. Way to push the envelope of stupid! Kudos!

Aw you're talking about yourself again? I guess someone has to praise you. I challenge you to go to a lawyer's office and ask any lawyer how he/she would do without their paralegal. How do you know I have an associates? For all you know I could have a bachelor's and be heading towards law school. But you don't know that now do you? Tsk, tsk. You sure do love making baseless assumptions about people. I guess you gotta find someway to feel good about yourself. Might as well do it on a "political debate" message board where you can huff and puff and degrade people behind the screen. That's precious. And I hope you know the only thing you're doing is showing your character to anyone who sees your posts. You don't mean anything to me. I don't know you. I don't care to know you. You're nothing but something to waste time on. An amusement to laugh at because you're so hilarious and don't get ****. You don't even understand that Democratic Socialist's aren't in the Democratic Party. You don't get why Sanders works with the Democratic Party. Why do I give a tinkers damn what someone like that thinks about me and my profession since I haven't even been here a week yet? If that's what helps you feel better about yourself it's nothing off me because well you don't mean anything to me whatsoever. I don't think about you at all except when I'm responding to your hilarious posts. So, talk about pushing the envelope of stupid. I've been called much, much, worse throughout my life by all sorts of people online and offline. I've been through my own ****. You can call me stupid all day long and degrade my work as much as you want. Just know I've had worse from people who were even supposed to love and care for me. So, you darling are out of your league in trying to hurt me. You won't. You can't. So, go head and say **** cause well it's just showing who you are. And anytime a conservative faker shows their true colors makes me happy. If you have to sit here online on this message board and harp right wing talking points about a politician who doesn't know you exist and "exposing their truths" or whatever **** that is to make your life better have at it. Just know that it doesn't mean a damn thing. And quite frankly I really don't care about your assumptions about me or anything. You. Mean. Nothing. To. Me. Oh and talk about "full of it" when you think you yapping on this message board means that you're doing something. Guess what? You aren't. Tomorrow you'll still be you yapping on this board and Hillary Clinton will still be Hillary Clinton and have more power than you probably ever will dream of having and you're a damn hypocrite talking about posts driving ideology. No ****, Sherlock. What do you think is the point of this place? Says the person who has an "Incompetence" Obama sticker in their signature on every post they make. What a joke.
 
Last edited:
Again, someone has to die before you help them? Well then there goes that help...A great cop-out for you. You don't gotta do anything except wait for the person to die.
 
So you just talk to your friends and that's how you come to the conclusion that no one supports him or takes him seriously? How has he been in government so long if no one supported him or took him seriously? You are aware of his history right? He's been re-elected by the people of his state time and time again....and now people even asking him to run for president but he declines. Yeah, no one takes him seriously alright lol.

Yet, what pray tell is wrong with his stance on the deficit? I see you failed to actually show what is wrong with it. Of course you'd just say "socialist!!!!" :roll:



Oh I'm glad I was at least close. He was a big believer in everything and supported the idea of working together as a community etc. I'm more into him as a psychological/sociology mindset than political.



Democratic Socialist's are not Democrats.... He's listed as an Independent for government purposes. He's the only one in his party there. The Democratic Socialist's are a separate party of the Democratic Party. You don't know this basic fact? I answered myself what? That you're quite ignorant? I was already self-aware of that.



What tactics? That I'm not sucking on a Benghazi passy like you are? I'm in the legal profession dear. I hate to disappoint you. That's why you have people who are professional's who take care of things like this. You're not even letting people do their jobs and you're already crucifying. I find that quite moronic you're using your moronic ideology to crucify someone before anything has even happened or shown. Tsk. Please follow your own advice before you give it. And what tactics? Responding to you on a message board that's supposed to be civil? Who knew trying to just talk about **** was a tactic now? Shame, really. Are you that paranoid? Maybe you should seek help?



Bless your heart. You FINALLY found someone who you can use for your agenda. Now, of course, you're going to turn around and go after the Mother's who were trying to get gun control after their kids deaths now, right?

As far as lying goes: omg a human being lied to another! I'm SHOCKED! Shocked I tell you! And sorry but I don't buy **** from your side at all. Y'all use people all the goddamn time and harp on and on about "omg the left uses people for agenda's!" yet here you are. It's a sad joke.

As far as it goes YOUR OWN PARTY'S investigation found NOTHING. NOTHING. This whole thing is pathetic and embarrassing.



Oh, sweetie. You're in no position to talk about moral high grounds after all the deaths that have happened, homeless people your side has caused, Guantanamo Bay abuse. If you're using this "Moral high ground" bull**** you're going to lose. And I'm sure you're using it in a religious manner which is quite bull**** as well. That's all a bunch of crap.



Oh, I see. So, people have to die before you want to help them. That's really sad. :2no4: But once they're dead well you'd say "oops can't help them now they're dead" and you won't want to help anyone who is starving.

So your premise is that even though Obama and Hillary made poor judgement calls that led to the deaths of 4 Americans, and then lied for their personal political gain-its somehow (because you say so) ME thats playing politics?

And when I cite an example of how exactly the administration continues to disrespect those killed by showing how they are treating the mother of one of those dead-thats me being political?

The benghazi investigation that found no wrong doing was pertaining only the the military response AFTER the attacks, not the preceding factors, nor the political cover up afterwords. Thats why its ongoing.

Beyond that-because of the fact that people lie, we should expect and tolerate such behavior from those we entrust with the greatest power? Why wasn't this response seen by the left when they claimed "Bush lied, Iraqi's and Americans died"? H

ow exactly can you hold the moral high ground with this mindset?
 
You're own ****ing party found jack **** in their little play toy investigations. That's how I have the moral high ground. And morals are religious ****.
 
This explains in part why e-mails are important, doesn't it?

Absolutely, we have the Presidents personal representative to Libya under fire from terrorist weapons on 9/11, and he can't even contact the SoS, which is his boss? And she knew the attack was underway!
 
Look you made two statements which are opposed to each other. I'm asking which one you choose since you've brought up multiple times this is a debate forum. One of the basics of debate is a person must take a position on a subject.... you can't seem to get past go on this one. My opinion on why you cannot choose goes back to one of my earlier posts where I stated your not here to debate but to vomit ideology. By not taking a position you're proving that opinion to be true. Is your contention to prove me correct? If so, thank you very much.

The premise of her reply appears to be that while her comments appear diametrically opposed, thats actually your fault for thinking in "black and white". :lol:

Its classic lefty, a textbook case.
 
Back
Top Bottom