• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

You still don't have a goddamn clue do you? You're a waste of time. I've said so many freaking times in this thread I was never against an investigation. One is already under way so what's the point? I'm a nobody on a message board yapping about ****. It's not like no one who matters in the situation is going to read little ol' me's posts and say "well SB thinks this or that, so let's listen to her!"
Then you must be new at communicating because when I stated the exact same thing saying I was in favor of an investigation you stated this to me:

SouthernBelle82 said:
It's sad you find that something to be proud of....
What about education? Law & order issues? Rebuilding? Helping vets? Helping with the economy? You'd rather go after Emails?

Yes I'm proud of going after politicians to find the truth. What you implied however was that you were not. Is English a new language to you?


SouthernBelle82 said:
My entire stance has been the exact. ****ing. same. in every damn post to you. You're too blind by **** to read a ****ing **** thing I've said. Go back and read my **** if you really gave a damn. But you don't. You're too interested in calling me a hack on a POLITICAL BOARD ABOUT DEBATING!

Also a lie - you stated this in this thread about going after Hillary and her emails...

SouthernBelle82 said:
There's so much work to do in this country and this is what the right wing is going after.

SouthernBelle82 said:
I do think it's stupid you're sitting here yapping and yapping and yapping about the same goddamn **** about this when there's already an investigation and Hillary has been cooperative and saying the same **** about it and handing over everything. It's stupid that you're sitting here when you're already ****ing getting what you want! There's so much other **** to do in this country. I'm done with this crap. Oh and I know you'll claim some sort of "victory" over my being done with this ****. So, go ahead if that makes you feel better about your "victory" while there's so much **** to do in this damn country thanks to you people. You can respond if you want but I'm just done with you in general. I can't talk to you at all. You never comprehend **** that I say and just yap about being a hack on a partisan debate board. What a joke. I'm just having to put you on ignore. I don't need blood pressure medicine at 32.


What's stupid is your yammering posts and incessant lies. You were now proven to NOT be in favor of it all along as your own words state. Tell you what - either get better at lying or start debating. I do however love how emotional you get .... yes "hack" is the word I'd continue to use regarding your posts, possibly with "extreme" added. Please continue to fail.... I'm digging it. :popcorn2:
 
Then you must be new at communicating because when I stated the exact same thing saying I was in favor of an investigation you stated this to me:



Yes I'm proud of going after politicians to find the truth. What you implied however was that you were not. Is English a new language to you?




Also a lie - you stated this in this thread about going after Hillary and her emails...






What's stupid is your yammering posts and incessant lies. You were now proven to NOT be in favor of it all along as your own words state. Tell you what - either get better at lying or start debating. I do however love how emotional you get .... yes "hack" is the word I'd continue to use regarding your posts, possibly with "extreme" added. Please continue to fail.... I'm digging it. :popcorn2:

Oh, so youj're going by IMPLICATIONS. Not what someone says. Just going to show that unless the person has the other "c" on their label they can never win with you.

And you wonder why people get emotional with you? You're frustrating as **** to talk to because you never comprehend a goddamn thing anyone says. I've seen other people get frustrated with you on here and call you out on your **** and then you whine about ****. And the word I'll use for you is pathetic.

And why would I waste my time with you when you'll just call me a liar at everything I say to you on here? Who wants to talk to someone who doesn't even open their mind to what the other person is saying about even the weather? If I said here where I live it's beautiful and sunny outside in casual chit chat you'd still call me a liar. I'm done with your ****. Have your "victory" because it's pathetic that you can't talk to people at all when people say **** to you. You don't show any "lies" in my post. I damn well said that. This is stupid because YOU'RE ALREADY GETTING WHAT YOU WANT!!!!

It's already happening. Why the **** does it matter what I do or don't want? It doesn't!
 
Last edited:
The one you posted in #47.

It was widely published in 2010... here's the Seattle Times article on it:
White House photo sparks protest | The Seattle Times

You see in the article it states the photos were made public....

Seattle Times said:
Doug Wilson, head of public affairs at the Pentagon, said the department did not know the White House photographer was present and had no idea a photo of the event was being released until it became public. He said the photographers who routinely travel with the defense secretary and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff were not allowed to go to the event, and no official Pentagon photos were taken or released.
 
Fail at what? Talking about ****? And what debate? You're not debating anything!

You've now been caught in a lie - you stated "You still don't have a goddamn clue do you? You're a waste of time. I've said so many freaking times in this thread I was never against an investigation."

That's a lie as you own words and prior posts state. That's what fails.... I can't debate with someone who seems to routinely forget what they just said minutes before. So which position would you like to take:

A).
SouthernBelle82 said:
There's so much work to do in this country and this is what the right wing is going after.

or

B).

SouthernBelle82 said:
I've said so many freaking times in this thread I was never against an investigation.


Note that they are not the same thing.
 
Oh, so youj're going by IMPLICATIONS.
Why don't you provide the post #'s of all the times you stated you were never against an investigation.


Not what someone says. Just going to show that unless the person has the other "c" on their label they can never win with you.
It would help if you were more coherent. You seem to be apt to go into fits of emotional rage ...



And why would I waste my time with you when you'll just call me a liar at everything I say to you on here?
Because I've already caught you in a lie? Because you advocate looking the other way when it's your political party at the end of the investigation? If your views and posts weren't so laughable I'd think this was some sort of POE joke.

For someone allegedly in the legal profession you sure don't remember what was said, nor structure your views or arguments factually do you?
 
You've now been caught in a lie - you stated "You still don't have a goddamn clue do you? You're a waste of time. I've said so many freaking times in this thread I was never against an investigation."

That's a lie as you own words and prior posts state. That's what fails.... I can't debate with someone who seems to routinely forget what they just said minutes before. So which position would you like to take:

A).


or

B).




Note that they are not the same thing.

You don't get **** that I've said at all during these last half a dozen pages to you.

1) There's already a ****ing investigation under way before I even joined this forum.

2) I have no ****ing say over law or legal procedure dealing with the Secretary of State's office. Shocking, I know. These rules have been in existence for a long time.

3) What I do or don't think about **** has no bearing at all on anything except my measly little vote in elections the rare times I do have a candidate worth my vote.

4) I'm not against an investigation because one is already happening. Everything is already going to be turned over and Hillary Clinton has already said she will cooperate and agree's with it. This happened BEFORE I joined this forum by the way.

5) I said it's stupid you right wingers are spending so much goddamn time over this and harping and harping on and on about this and Benghazi when there's SO much work to be done in this country. This is all you people are ever talking about when you're not talking about people's sex lives. That is pathetic.

Now, I'm done with your insulting ****. If you can't comprehend that too damn bad.
 
Why don't you provide the post #'s of all the times you stated you were never against an investigation.


It would help if you were more coherent. You seem to be apt to go into fits of emotional rage ...



Because I've already caught you in a lie? Because you advocate looking the other way when it's your political party at the end of the investigation? If your views and posts weren't so laughable I'd think this was some sort of POE joke.

For someone allegedly in the legal profession you sure don't remember what was said, nor structure your views or arguments factually do you?

This is a message board. Not a legal document. Don't flatter yourself. You aren't worth that much time and effort. As far as my emotions it's called frustration because you can't comprehend **** unless the other person is a conservative.
 
You don't get **** that I've said at all during these last half a dozen pages to you.
I'm going to ignore the rest of your emotional incoherent rant and ask again... A or B?

Pick one because you've already stated both and have lied saying you've been consistent but you obviously haven't. So which one?
 
This is a message board. Not a legal document. Don't flatter yourself. You aren't worth that much time and effort.

Ah so facts don't matter to you..... not surprising!
 
I'm going to ignore the rest of your emotional incoherent rant and ask again... A or B?

Pick one because you've already stated both and have lied saying you've been consistent but you obviously haven't. So which one?

Get a damn hobby instead of harassing me over ****.
 
You don't get **** that I've said at all during these last half a dozen pages to you.

1) There's already a ****ing investigation under way before I even joined this forum.

2) I have no ****ing say over law or legal procedure dealing with the Secretary of State's office. Shocking, I know. These rules have been in existence for a long time.

3) What I do or don't think about **** has no bearing at all on anything except my measly little vote in elections the rare times I do have a candidate worth my vote.

4) I'm not against an investigation because one is already happening. Everything is already going to be turned over and Hillary Clinton has already said she will cooperate and agree's with it. This happened BEFORE I joined this forum by the way.

5) I said it's stupid you right wingers are spending so much goddamn time over this and harping and harping on and on about this and Benghazi when there's SO much work to be done in this country. This is all you people are ever talking about when you're not talking about people's sex lives. That is pathetic.

Now, I'm done with your insulting ****. If you can't comprehend that too damn bad.



Your posts are gibberish.....
 
I'm going to ignore the rest of your emotional incoherent rant and ask again... A or B?

Pick one because you've already stated both and have lied saying you've been consistent but you obviously haven't. So which one?

You two should get married.....
 
Get a damn hobby instead of harassing me over ****.

That's an interesting accusation since you have the ability to not respond to my posts at any point yet you continue to engage.... perhaps if you just took a position A or B as you've stated both, we could move on. So which is it A or B?
 
That's an interesting accusation since you have the ability to not respond to my posts at any point yet you continue to engage.... perhaps if you just took a position A or B as you've stated both, we could move on. So which is it A or B?

Or how about I'm done giving a ****?

I damn well did but you can't be satisfied unless I tell you what you want to hear and I don't do that ****.
 
You two should get married.....

That positions already filled on my end.... and hey, I have standards. Someone who can't figure out a simple "I am for" or "I am against" wouldn't be in the running. Also, the mouth on this one and the emotional outbursts, that's torture over and above waterboarding.
 
Don't make me throw up. And that's juvenile as ****.

You have a nice day too...

One thing I have noticed among the extreme left, not only do you have to shut down most of your reasoning capabilities, but also surrender any sense of humor which may or may not have been present at birth.

Once again, I wish you a wonderful day and I am glad we can be here for you to work out your anger
 
Or how about I'm done giving a ****?

I damn well did but you can't be satisfied unless I tell you what you want to hear and I don't do that ****.

So you don't know or are incapable of picking a position on the topic. Thank you for confirming.
 
I think the Belle of Benghazi's prospects for a run at the presidency are not much brighter than Dr. Carson's. The only reason the lying hag is even in the running is that her party doesn't have anything better. Well, on second thought, there is the Delaware Dunce, with all his vice-presidential experience.
 
That positions already filled on my end.... and hey, I have standards. Someone who can't figure out a simple "I am for" or "I am against" wouldn't be in the running. Also, the mouth on this one and the emotional outbursts, that's torture over and above waterboarding.

For a lot of people, that IS marriage
 
Back
Top Bottom