• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

Let me repeat:

There has never been a reported case of a person starving to death in the US for lack of food. None, sip zero, nada. Unless they purposely starved themselves, in that case they commuted suicide, or were held without food and in that case that would be murder.

Now you go on to say we must stop suicides and murders. I think we are already trying to do that. All this BS about children dying of starvation is Bull ****. There has never been a reported case of that happening in the US. Period.. However I challenge you to prove me wrong.

Your problem is you aren't seeing things through the distorted lens of the left. Conservatives and Republicans want children to die from starvation, and even if there are no facts to back that up its on you for seeing the truth in black and white. :lol:
 
A House committee investigating the Benghazi, Libya, attacks issued subpoenas Wednesday for the emails of Hillary Rodham Clinton, who used a private account exclusively for official business when she was secretary of state — and also used a computer email server now traced back to her family's New York home.

WireAP_4c9846b185264660a148a70cb41395f3_16x9_992.jpg


The subpoenas from the Republican-led Select Committee on Benghazi demanded additional material from Clinton and others related to Libya, spokesman Jamal D. Ware said. The panel also sent instructions to technology companies instructing them to preserve any relevant documents in their possession.

House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe - ABC News

Hillary doesn't have the country's best interest at heart. Just her own interests. She would use the office as president as a means to make something for herself, not to move the country in a direction that would she felt would benefit everyone. If you thought Obama did a bad job, wait until she's in office. She has more scandals attached to her name than most of Congress combined. Would it surprise me if she got elected? Nope. People tend to forget things very fast. It will be the same thing we now hear with Obama:

"He was the best of both choices."

As though Romney has ever given a shot and they knew what would happen in had he been elected.
 
I completely understand, but how many times do they need to investigate this?

That is an idiotic statement given that all previous investigations were denied key evidence.
 
And of course...the usual suspects tripping over themselves to carry her water...



Even democrats are backing away over the email thing..but not the true believers...


Well, the true believers know in their heart that Hilary was their only chance for the Presidency in 2016.
 
If you're concerned about preventing American deaths, your priorities are misplaced in witch hunting four Americans killed in a hostile region.

Preventable_causes_of_death.png

ani-wonder_deflection.gif
 
Short-quoted for band-width.
Since I know you from before DP, just noting how much fun you righties are having with Warren and the new poster.

There are plenty of DEM strategists calling Clinton out for an explanation.
Righties have already forgotten that Maddow and O'Donnell broke the email story Monday night, without defending her.
Followed by the New York Times trashing her the next two days and now HuffPo.
I'm actually seeing more defense on CNN rather than MSNBC, which highlights these emails each hour.

You would enjoy watching FOX/Baier at 6:00 Eastern--I never miss it when I'm at home unless there's a big sports event.

The next big DEM candidate is ex-Gov. O'Malley.
This was confirmed in my mind when Van Hollen chose to run for Mikulski's open Senate seat, with O'Malley bowing out .


I wouldn't put much stock in O'Malley, he has way to much baggage from his days and Gov of Maryland. The Rain Tax alone would do him in.

Also, the far left is priming the pump for a Warren run so if they can get rid of Hilary all the better.
 
Hillary doesn't have the country's best interest at heart. Just her own interests. She would use the office as president as a means to make something for herself, not to move the country in a direction that would she felt would benefit everyone. If you thought Obama did a bad job, wait until she's in office. She has more scandals attached to her name than most of Congress combined. Would it surprise me if she got elected? Nope. People tend to forget things very fast. It will be the same thing we now hear with Obama:

"He was the best of both choices."

As though Romney has ever given a shot and they knew what would happen in had he been elected.
I think I remember a quote from Bill Clinton once that went something like "You guys get president Hillary and you will ALL be wanting to **** Monica Lewinsky..."

or something like that.
 
Ah yes so now you change it lol. Go figure. I knew you would lol. Y'all are so easy to read you don't need Sylvia Browne.

You call it "being dumb" I call it "not intelligent enough to understand."

You said he wasn't popular and no one wanted him. Now that has been challenged you're saying he's not "competent." Lol. I love this place!

Your repetitive post are so lazy, so superficial and so insubstantial.

Its becoming more and more evident WHY you support such a radical and destructive ideology.

It's all you've exposed yourself too apparently. There's little if any informative aspects to the rhetoric you post daily.

Socialism and Communism can only exist and thrive in a Society that's filled with a uneducated and easily manipulated populace . The less informed the populace is the easier it is to control and steer them with empty promises based on " equality and fairness ". This is one of the reasons Obama would LOVE to flood the United States with illegal immigrants from Mexico and Central and South America.

They would bring with them, their gullibility and their predisposition to false narratives that leads to the election of people like Chavez in Venezuela or Fernandez in Argentina. Obama's election and re-election were made possible by appealing to allot of low information Americans who actually believed his long list of empty platitudes and who equated " Hope and Change " to Presidential Qualifications.
 
I wouldn't put much stock in O'Malley, he has way to much baggage from his days and Gov of Maryland. The Rain Tax alone would do him in.

Also, the far left is priming the pump for a Warren run so if they can get rid of Hilary all the better.

I suppose the Politicos from each party will always think they have enough on the issues and tape to take out the candidates from the other party.
This would especially seem true with governors, who have to make real decisions on governing with balanced budgets.

Why do you suppose it is that each of us is more captivated by the candidates from the other party--ain't politics grand?
The list of GOP governors is deep in my book--Walker, Bush, Kasich, Pence, Perry, Christie and Sandoval.

Sandoval is one of the GOP's enigmas for me--now very popular in NV and a shoe-in IMO to take out Reid for the Senate in 2016 if he so chooses.
Yet Sandoval as a VP gives you a lock on NV, NM and CO, three states Obama won both times.
Not to mention how his Hispanic credentials could help Walker in Florida
 
I caught your post a few days ago speaking of the real accumulated debt--about 76 trillion including unfunded pension liabilities.
I'm of a mind to certainly believe that the debt is far worse than 18 trillion.
With public pension fixes kicked down the road from the feds to the states to the locals to around 2045.
I expect this crisis to come to a head in about another decade .

I think I remember a quote from Bill Clinton once that went something like "You guys get president Hillary and you will ALL be wanting to **** Monica Lewinsky..."

or something like that.
 
And if he didn't you would be ****ting on his ass for that saying: "he doesn't care about the families! Why isn't he showing his respect for the dead he killed?!!!" :roll:

Hey! His salute's gotten better.
 
Your repetitive post are so lazy, so superficial and so insubstantial.

Its becoming more and more evident WHY you support such a radical and destructive ideology.

It's all you've exposed yourself too apparently. There's little if any informative aspects to the rhetoric you post daily.

Socialism and Communism can only exist and thrive in a Society that's filled with a uneducated and easily manipulated populace . The less informed the populace is the easier it is to control and steer them with empty promises based on " equality and fairness ". This is one of the reasons Obama would LOVE to flood the United States with illegal immigrants from Mexico and Central and South America.

They would bring with them, their gullibility and their predisposition to false narratives that leads to the election of people like Chavez in Venezuela or Fernandez in Argentina. Obama's election and re-election were made possible by appealing to allot of low information Americans who actually believed his long list of empty platitudes and who equated " Hope and Change " to Presidential Qualifications.

This is true, communism was intended to take hold in Germany, and in the last days of WW1 thats what marxists expected-except it was rejected. The only place backwards enough for it to take hold was in Russia. And then it spread to other backwards, largely agrarian societies-where it remains to this day, if only in its dated and largely discredited form.
 
The premise of her reply appears to be that while her comments appear diametrically opposed, thats actually your fault for thinking in "black and white". :lol:

Its classic lefty, a textbook case.

I'd call it passive aggreesive borderline personality disorder, with a nice side helping of fruit loop left wing nuttiness.
 
Back
Top Bottom