• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

Grant said:
Actually it is, unless you are making the claim that all Muslims are inspired by the Koran to murder unbelievers. The Quran's Verses of Violence
Click to expand...

No, it's not. There are well defined branches within the Muslim faith. (i.e. Sunni, Shia) Go ahead and keep the "religionofpeace.com" racist spew to yourself please.
 
Travis007 said:
define "innocent"...

because Im not buying it... what you are saying is Muslims are ok with others in society being "dhimmis" and second class...
Click to expand...

Where did I "say" that? I am saying that the Muslim faith does not require the murder of innocent people.
 
MMC said:
No mine had nothing to do with parties.....mine had to do with US FP. Oh and Oil isn't our only interests.

So why deflect when it was clearly stated about actions initiated by those in the ME Monte? Actions and behaviors that that align them against us. Again, Monte.....Initiated by those in the ME.

Which means anything the US does.....is in response.

Note how you little issue about parties means nothing with this point. It just means other countries doing something to screw with us. Which none in either party would accept your way of Submission and don't stir up the natives, when it is response time.
Click to expand...

Incoherent sentence structure. Care to clean that up so that I can respond correctly?
 
Frantz Fanon said:
Ergo. You.Have.Nothing.

Nice work.
Click to expand...



ReverendHellh0und said:
What actions would you support and by whom?
Click to expand...



This is what started this volley, perhaps I missed where you "had something", or as we call it "an answer".


Any work, attended to, by The Good Reverend, is "nice." thank you for noticing, now care to drop this sophomoric game and actually answer my question?
 
Frantz Fanon said:
Where did I "say" that? I am saying that the Muslim faith does not require the murder of innocent people.
Click to expand...

oh well...thats a real game changer.. good to know they are not required to kill..
 
Frantz Fanon said:
No, it's not. There are well defined branches within the Muslim faith. (i.e. Sunni, Shia) Go ahead and keep the "religionofpeace.com" racist spew to yourself please.
Click to expand...
Spew or not are you denying these verses are in the Koran? Would you prefer another source?
 
Frantz Fanon said:
Where did I "say" that? I am saying that the Muslim faith does not require the murder of innocent people.
Click to expand...

so is ISIS islamic? and they say they are the REAL FUNDEMENTALIST Muslims...

You may want to chat with them on how confused they are...

Im a bit tired of this canard..
 
Last edited:
Frantz Fanon said:
What branch of Christianity is Fred Phelps part of? And the CAR Christian militias?

Yes, There Are Christian Terrorists - The Daily Beast
Click to expand...
And what does this mean to you? That it's okay to kill Christians because, in Africa, there are Christians murdering innocent people? Is that how the Islamic train of thought runs?

Now that we know how Muslims feel about murdering Jews and Christians what about atheists? Are Muslims hesitant to murder them or are they on the agenda as well?
 
Montecresto said:
Incoherent sentence structure. Care to clean that up so that I can respond correctly?
Click to expand...

It would mean the trouble is started by those in the ME.....that requires a response. Foreign Policy its called. Actions initiated and instigated by those there that go against us or our allies.

Shouldn't be to hard to figure out. No matter how it is worded. Especially for one who has knowledge about such. Like you have shown, huh?
 
Travis007 said:
oh well...thats a real game changer.. good to know they are not required to kill..
Click to expand...
It seems to be an option, though not one without some controversy. Many Muslims are against the killing part despite the demands of the Koran. Some show more flexibility.
 
Grant said:
It seems to be an option, though not one without some controversy. Many Muslims are against the killing part despite the demands of the Koran. Some show more flexibility.
Click to expand...

I know I quake over radical Mormans that want to kill "fashion"...LOL
 
Travis007 said:
I know I quake over radical Mormans that want to kill "fashion"...LOL
Click to expand...
Come to think of it I haven't heard Obama mention anything about "Radical Mormons" either! And he has been silent on the Amish issue.
 
Grant said:
Come to think of it I haven't heard Obama mention anything about "Radical Mormons" either! And he has been silent on the Amish issue.
Click to expand...



Actually, the DHS, does identify "christian" terrorist threats, but does not use the word "islamic" to discuss isis type threats:


A quote from the Department of Homeland Security report issue April of 2009.

“Antigovernment conspiracy theories and “end times” prophecies could motivate extremist individuals and groups to stockpile food, ammunition, and weapons. These teachings also have been linked with the radicalization of domestic extremist individuals and groups in the past, such as violent Christian Identity organizations and extremist members of the militia movement. “


Read more: Blog: DHS shuns the label 'Islamic' extremists but is okay with 'Christian' extremists
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
 
Grant said:
Come to think of it I haven't heard Obama mention anything about "Radical Mormons" either! And he has been silent on the Amish issue.
Click to expand...

I agree... I was shocked : )
 
Grant said:
The passages in the Koran referring to actions to be taken against non-Muslims are often mentioned and easily discovered. There are many stats available concerning the attitudes of Muslims towards terrorists on Pew research.

Everyone knows by now that Not All Muslims Are Terrorists.
Click to expand...


You need to come visit Texas my friend :)
 
Frantz Fanon said:
No. Unless you think Fred Phelps is a Christian.
Click to expand...

Fred Phelps is a corpse. He was, absolutely, a Christian when he was alive though. Don't go pulling the "no true Christian" fallacy.
 
rcart76 said:
You need to come visit Texas my friend :)
Click to expand...

12 and half hrs straight thru, doing 80-90mph, and only stopping for gas. Chicago to Dallas. Took 57 to 55 then to 40 and then 30West. ;)

On our way back we took our time as we wanted to see what things actually looked like driving home.
iroc.gif
 
Grant said:
Lots of Islamists in Texas? I understand Texans take the Second Amendment seriously.
Click to expand...

No they don't, they make fun of the militia.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom