• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Exclusive: Secret tapes undermine Hillary Clinton on Libyan war[W:292]

US Conservative

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
33,522
Reaction score
10,826
Location
Between Athens and Jerusalem
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Top Pentagon officials and a senior Democrat in Congress so distrusted Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s 2011 march to war in Libya that they opened their own diplomatic channels with the Gadhafi regime in an effort to halt the escalating crisis, according to secret audio recordings recovered from Tripoli.

The tapes, reviewed by The Washington Times and authenticated by the participants, chronicle U.S. officials’ unfiltered conversations with Col. Moammar Gadhafi’s son and a top Libyan leader, including criticisms that Mrs. Clinton had developed tunnel vision and led the U.S. into an unnecessary war without adequately weighing the intelligence community’s concerns.


Read more: Hillary Clinton undercut on Libya war by Pentagon and Congress, secret tapes reveal - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

More here... http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/621724

A few interesting points here... It suggests that Hillary was relying on false intelligence to go into Libya. Hillary was apparently pushing the genocide angle, is Kucinich lying?

In any case, its interesting what parallels between the lefts arguments on Iraq and going into Libya are...
 
The Moony Times and NewsMax? you must be kidding me.

/thread
 
This tells me you are worried. I wonder what implications this could have next election?
Hillary lied...Americans died. I bet thats what the ads would say. :2wave:

if1jv8Ca4vywOm3vBNJyJbcgDFAzCuUh0wILgJYY20hLFd1ukUTibgGp2tKn6wEdTTlErw=s128
 
Mrs. Clinton is as practiced and casual a liar as President Pinocchio himself--and that takes some doing. When I am not calling her a damned commie witch, I think of her as "The Belle of Benghazi." They should get Tyrone Woods' father on tape saying what he thinks of her.
 
Last edited:
Ohhh now I see where this is going. This investigation that has found nothing in the past years, are now turning the page and instead not the attack itself, but now reasons for bombing Libya. Funny how they moved the goalposts. I guess this is the first time that Republicans are against dropping bombs on a country...
 
Mrs. Clinton is as practiced and casual a liar as President Pinocchio himself--and that takes some doing. When I am not calling her a damned commie witch, I think of her as "The Belle of Benghazi." They should get Tyrone Woods' father on tape saying what he thinks of her.
And I think President Bush should have met with Cindy Sheehan.
 
Ohhh now I see where this is going. This investigation that has found nothing in the past years, are now turning the page and instead not the attack itself, but now reasons for bombing Libya. Funny how they moved the goalposts. I guess this is the first time that Republicans are against dropping bombs on a country...

There is no association with the official investigation of the Americans including the Presidents personal representative-killed on 9/11 by islamic terrorists.
This is a separate issue-how we got into Libya in the first place. It appears Hillary was war mongering. :2wave:
 
There is no association with the official investigation of the Americans including the Presidents personal representative-killed on 9/11 by islamic terrorists.
There is none? Is this a statement?

This is a separate issue-how we got into Libya in the first place. It appears Hillary was war mongering. :2wave:

I was against Obama bombing Libya in the first place. But this is a clear hack show. On one end you have Republicans to get involved in Ukraine, get involved in Syria, etc. but when it came to Libya (in which many in the GOP vocally supported) they are suddenly against it. What happened? Did the GOP randomly become the anti-hawk, anti-interventionist party? Or were they just the party that is against anything Obama does? I think this clearly shows the hypocrisy and the hack show this has become.
 
When is Newsmax considered mainstream news?

And also Washington Times??? Please! It's a tabloid peoples!
 
There is none? Is this a statement?



I was against Obama bombing Libya in the first place. But this is a clear hack show. On one end you have Republicans to get involved in Ukraine, get involved in Syria, etc. but when it came to Libya (in which many in the GOP vocally supported) they are suddenly against it. What happened? Did the GOP randomly become the anti-hawk, anti-interventionist party? Or were they just the party that is against anything Obama does? I think this clearly shows the hypocrisy and the hack show this has become.

If you read the articles I linked to, you would see that Benghazi was not mentioned. This pertains to the entire conflict. And it may be a game changer. I have no doubt more info is coming on this.
 
If you read the articles I linked to, you would see that Benghazi was not mentioned. This pertains to the entire conflict. And it may be a game changer. I have no doubt more info is coming on this.

Uhh did you miss the part these are going to the House Committee on Benghazi? And of course you think its gonna be a "game changer". For the past 3 years we have been hearing about all these "game changers" but every time the GOP has found nothing. But hey, keep it up.
But thanks for ignoring the clear hypocrisy here :peace
 
Ohhh now I see where this is going. This investigation that has found nothing in the past years, are now turning the page and instead not the attack itself, but now reasons for bombing Libya. Funny how they moved the goalposts. I guess this is the first time that Republicans are against dropping bombs on a country...

Why, in your opinion, would Republicans be for dropping bombs on a country?
 
Uhh did you miss the part these are going to the House Committee on Benghazi? And of course you think its gonna be a "game changer". For the past 3 years we have been hearing about all these "game changers" but every time the GOP has found nothing. But hey, keep it up.
But thanks for ignoring the clear hypocrisy here :peace

You mean the house oversight committee?

Lets find out together. What did Hillary know, and when did she know it?
 
Ohhh now I see where this is going. This investigation that has found nothing in the past years, are now turning the page and instead not the attack itself, but now reasons for bombing Libya. Funny how they moved the goalposts. I guess this is the first time that Republicans are against dropping bombs on a country...

So now your goal posts have changed is more like it.
 
You mean the house oversight committee?
No. I mean the United States House Select Committee on Benghazi.

Lets find out together. What did Hillary know, and when did she know it?
Go ahead. It still shows clear hypocrisy. But hey have at it. She has agreed to testify again. But its showing to be a one sided partisan witch hunt without regards to logic and the truth.
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1064284809 said:
So now your goal posts have changed is more like it.

Not at all. Where did I "move the goal posts"?
 
Top Pentagon officials and a senior Democrat in Congress so distrusted Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s 2011 march to war in Libya that they opened their own diplomatic channels with the Gadhafi regime in an effort to halt the escalating crisis, according to secret audio recordings recovered from Tripoli.

The tapes, reviewed by The Washington Times and authenticated by the participants, chronicle U.S. officials’ unfiltered conversations with Col. Moammar Gadhafi’s son and a top Libyan leader, including criticisms that Mrs. Clinton had developed tunnel vision and led the U.S. into an unnecessary war without adequately weighing the intelligence community’s concerns.


Read more: Hillary Clinton undercut on Libya war by Pentagon and Congress, secret tapes reveal - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

More here... http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/621724

A few interesting points here... It suggests that Hillary was relying on false intelligence to go into Libya. Hillary was apparently pushing the genocide angle, is Kucinich lying?

In any case, its interesting what parallels between the lefts arguments on Iraq and going into Libya are...

I don't believe Kucinich is lying. Going into unnecessary wars, based on false claims seems to be a growing trend that only bothers some people when democrats do it, lol.
 
This tells me you are worried. I wonder what implications this could have next election?
Hillary lied...Americans died. I bet thats what the ads would say. :2wave:

Nah, Americans don't care about that ****, look at all those that turned out for Bush the second term, after all but the most hardened supporters acknowledged that he lied and people died. The party, the team, is what matters. The left will still line up and pull the lever for Hillary, just as you lined up and pulled the lever for Bush, see how that partisan **** works??
 
Back
Top Bottom