• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Exclusive: Secret tapes undermine Hillary Clinton on Libyan war[W:292]

US Conservative said:
Once again you attempt and fail, tiny dancer.
Click to expand...

So let me get this straight. You want a new investigation, because the last 8 investigators are not sufficient, even tho the latest investigation (who was ran and headed by GOP members) is "liberal dancing". You are the dancer here. But hey, keep it up! Maybe the 9th will get em! Like the whole GOP this has become a joke to the majority of Americans. You can try to repeal the ACA for 50+ times, and you can hold Benghazi hearings for an even 8+ times but you'll find the dead end. Yet just tell your nut job base "we will find the truth" and they will rally behind the cause.. Keep on rallying, at least you got the willpower to blindly follow, even though logical reasoning is a million miles away from your cause.
 
NIMBY said:
For having 91 posts, who are you to discuss my lean?

Not to mention directly calling me deranged in the upstairs forum.

It is an absolute fat that Bibi is pissed at Boehner for using him in a sleazy and blatantly partisan way in the GOP's treasonous behavior.

And how ****ing stupid what is it for yer boy Bush to piss off a billion Muslims with his "Bring It On" idiocy
Click to expand...

Nimby, you are a lefty arguing as a lefty does. Its readily apparent to others.
 
Yer lack of historical understanding of when the USA made a commitment to support Vietnam is duly noted and dismissed.

A real shame to, don't you think, since the North didn't want to go with Russia and China.

Chainsaw said:
Trying to change the subject?,.......tells me all I need to know about your argument.

Nixon did a lousy job trying to get the US out of JFK/LBJs war. Does that make you happy?
Click to expand...
 
NIMBY said:
For having 91 posts, who are you to discuss my lean?

Not to mention directly calling me deranged in the upstairs forum.

It is an absolute fat that Bibi is pissed at Boehner for using him in a sleazy and blatantly partisan way in the GOP's treasonous behavior.

And how ****ing stupid what is it for yer boy Bush to piss off a billion Muslims with his "Bring It On" idiocy
Click to expand...

VN Body Count under the E Admin?

And that last post proved that point.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
So let me get this straight. You want a new investigation, because the last 8 investigators are not sufficient, even tho the latest investigation (who was ran and headed by GOP members) is "liberal dancing". You are the dancer here. But hey, keep it up! Maybe the 9th will get em! Like the whole GOP this has become a joke to the majority of Americans. You can try to repeal the ACA for 50+ times, and you can hold Benghazi hearings for an even 8+ times but you'll find the dead end. Yet just tell your nut job base "we will find the truth" and they will rally behind the cause.. Keep on rallying, at least you got the willpower to blindly follow, even though logical reasoning is a million miles away from your cause.
Click to expand...

Nothings over. Take warning. :2wave:
 
NIMBY said:
The allies trust the GOP far less than Obama.

Even Bibi is pissed at Boehner for hanging him out to dry and is firing back.

In this dangerous world, the Allies are far more comfortable with 'No Drama Obama' than "Bring It On' .
Click to expand...

'No Drama Obama', when you can't count on the man, and can't count on what he says? Hmm. I'm not seeing that.
 
Ignoring who makes the first step in a commitment to war, such as Bush-43 did in the Middle East, is Blatant Partisan Hackery.
As you are also doing with Eisenhower/Nixon in Vietnam.

Ignoring the fact that we have administrative overlap in wars is simply a sign of the times.
With GOP/CON/FOXbots like you still trying to dig out and deflect from the Cheney/Bush disaster of last decade .

Chainsaw said:
VN Body Count under the E Admin?

And that last post proved that point.
Click to expand...
 
4 The NIMBY!!!!!

Chainsaw said:
shrubnose said:
AMEN!!!!! Ho Chi just wanted a free VN. The US armed Ho Chi during WW2 to help defend/put down Japanese aggression in SE Asia. In return Ho Chi requested US support to remove the French from VN. And the US sided with the spineless French, and Ho Chi went to and received communist support. The rest is history. Other than the Revolutionary war, what good has ever come from our alliance with the French?,.....I am sure there is some good things....please remind me.
Click to expand...

I may be a bit abrupt at the 'upstairs forum', but at least I can hold my own.
Click to expand...
 
Of course you're not--yer still defending the stupidity of 'Bring It On'.
You GOP/FOXbots will do anything to stop HRC--and you do know exactly what I mean by that .

eohrnberger said:
'No Drama Obama', when you can't count on the man, and can't count on what he says? Hmm. I'm not seeing that.
Click to expand...
 
NIMBY said:
Ignoring who makes the first step in a commitment to war, such as Bush-43 did in the Middle East, is Blatant Partisan Hackery.
As you are also doing with Eisenhower/Nixon in Vietnam.

Ignoring the fact that we have administrative overlap in wars is simply a sign of the times.
With GOP/CON/FOXbots like you still trying to dig out and deflect from the Cheney/Bush disaster of last decade .
Click to expand...

E hadn't got anyone KILLED YET, JFK could have could have pulled everyone of those guys out of VN. But he did the opposite, you know it, accept it, and live with it.
 
NIMBY said:
Of course you're not--yer still defending the stupidity of 'Bring It On'.
You GOP/FOXbots will do anything to stop HRC--and you do know exactly what I mean by that .
Click to expand...

I don't know what 'HRC' stands for.

I'm defending nothing here. I have a growing dislike and distrust of the Republicans that's quickly approaching the same level of my dislike and distrust of Democrats.
What more can I say about that?
 
Yet JFK is constantly used by the lying message machine of GOPs to try to divide the DEMs.
Which side of yer mouth do you speak out of on that matter?
.
The same JFK who wasn't a chicken**** chickenhawk like Bush-43 and Cheney.
Both of whom who have destabilized the world as we know it at this time.
Or does Present Moment Awareness ever dawn on you?

Not to mention the 100 years war that Southern Conservative Protestants have been waging against Catholics like JFK.
Those Southern Conservatioves who are represented by GOPs like Skkkalise today .

Chainsaw said:
E hadn't got anyone KILLED YET, JFK could have could have pulled everyone of those guys out of VN. But he did the opposite, you know it, accept it, and live with it.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
eohrnberger said:
I don't know what 'HRC' stands for.
Click to expand...
Sure you do--I've never known you to be this dishonest--but heh--look who yer agreeing with in this thread right now .

I'm defending nothing here.
I have a growing dislike and distrust of the Republicans that's quickly approaching the same level of my dislike and distrust of Democrats.
What more can I say about that?
Click to expand...

I don't believe you.
Your posting continues to say just the opposite.
Too bad .
 
Seems you GOP/FOXbots are al about body counts--a term you first introduced in this thread.
In your world, 4 dead in Ben--gha--zi is far greater than 4,500 dead in Iraq or 22 more dead every day from suicides from that war .

Chainsaw said:
The left set the precedent of using the body-count 'to score' Afghanistan and Iraq...........what was the body count in VN under 'E'??? Simple question.
Click to expand...
 
NIMBY said:
Sure you do--I've never known you to be this dishonest--but heh--look who yer agreeing with in this thread right now .
Click to expand...

Maybe it's that they are agreeing with me?

NIMBY said:
I don't believe you.
Your posting continues to say just the opposite.
Too bad .
Click to expand...

From what you've read in my posts, and how you've interpreted it, I'll grant you that it seems real to you.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Stop discussing each other, start discussing the topic. Otherwise, you'll be specially served with a double service- a thread ban and an infraction.
 
US Conservative said:
If she lied to get us into a war, thats extraordinary news. I guess we shall see.
Click to expand...

Heya USC. It was the French, they outplayed Susan Rice in the UN. As well as lied to the UN and the Planet.
 
Hilary had her hands tied!!!! Really can see the truth if you read what is not said in that article.
 
US Conservative said:
According to your posted info you joined the board after Libya occurred. Im not saying you weren't against it, but it is what it is.
If Hillary lied to get American in a foreign war (like the left claims Bush did) than surely she's just ended her chance at being president, because no lefty and many dems wont vote for her-no?
Click to expand...

You mean to say that if I wasn't bitching about it at DP, I wasn't bitching about it! What an argument. As to Hillary, I would never have voted for her, and seriously hope she doesn't even run. I have said on numerous occasions here, no more Clintons and no more Bush's. If Americans put either of them back in the WH, I may have to reconsider the aim of my criticisms.
 
matchlight said:
The notion that a person's criticism of a president of the United States is evidence of that person's dislike of the United States itself is ludicrous. Do you imagine Barack Obama is some kind of emperor we all must bow down to? It's exactly because I and millions of other Americans love this country that we hate to see a damned statist liar who has disdain for everything about it, and who does not wish it well, disgracing the White House. It's easy to understand why statists who share Obama's distaste for this country and his readiness to appease its enemies think so well of him.
Click to expand...

No, my criticisms of Obama's failed foreign policy in the ME and Ukraine would reveal that I don't think Obama an emperor. I was merely pointing out the absurdity of your continual claims that criticism of US foreign policy is paramount to hating America. Just because I point to the FP failures of BOTH parties. I'm sure if I did as you do and criticised only the FP's of democratic administrations, I'd be an outstanding American, just like you. Take your hypocrisy to bed with you.
 
US Conservative said:
Very well, Im just looking forward to libs demonstrating their staunch values by booting Hillary in the primary. Surely they can't support another Bush in the form of Hillary, correct? 3rd party 2016?
Click to expand...

For Pete's sake! Do you actually pay attention to my posts that you quote? What makes you think that I would contribute to the installation of another Bush or Clinton in the WH?????
 
US Conservative said:
Another liberal thinker, John Kerry actually went to Pakistan and told them we were ending our drone program there-they cheered until Kerry got home and it turns out he wasn't authorized to make that promise, and we in fact had no intentions of doing so.

This is Obama's famous smart diplomacy in action.
Click to expand...

Wait a minute, which part of that didn't you like? That we might end our PD program, or that we didn't?
 
US Conservative said:
You'd have to ask the democrats that got the US into that war...
Click to expand...

FDR was a democrat as well, and until his economic war, and other provocations, Japan was no threat to us either. I wonder who would pretend that democrats haven't deceived Americans into supporting wars of choice before.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom