If I understand your abbreviations right, you are asserting the U.S. is committing war crimes by killing ten civilians for every "alleged (key word there)" Islamic jihadist it kills in a drone attack. I doubt you can support that assertion with evidence--and the fact you make it suggests how eager you are to slander this country.
Once again, I'd like to recommend an excellent book by Andy McCarthy, the former federal prosecutor who led the prosecution of Omar Abdel "The Blind Sheikh" Rahman for leading the conspirators who bombed the World Trade Center the first time, in February, 1993. The title is "The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America."
Are you slandering your country by claiming that the left is sabotaging America?
Five years ago, on January 23 2009, a CIA drone flattened a house in Pakistan’s tribal regions. It was the third day of Barack Obama’s presidency, and this was the new commander-in-chief’s first covert drone strike.
Initial reports said up to ten militants were killed, including foreign fighters and possibly a ‘high-value target’ – a successful first hit for the fledgling administration.
But reports of civilian casualties began to emerge. As later reports revealed, the strike was far from a success. At least nine civilians died, most of them from one family. There was one survivor, 14-year-old Fahim Qureshi, but with horrific injuries including shrapnel wounds in his stomach, a fractured skull and a lost eye, he was as much a victim as his dead relatives.
Later that day, the CIA attacked again – and levelled another house. It proved another mistake, this time one that killed between five and ten people, all civilians.
http://www.thebureauinvestigates.co...ad-as-obamas-drone-campaign-marks-five-years/
41 men targeted but 1,147 people killed: US drone strikes – the facts on the ground
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/24/-sp-us-drone-strikes-kill-1147
The study by Stanford Law School and New York University's School of Law calls for a re-evaluation of the practice, saying the number of "high-level" targets killed as a percentage of total casualties is extremely low -- about 2%.
The report accuses Washington of misrepresenting drone strikes as "a surgically precise and effective tool that makes the U.S. safer," saying that in reality, "there is significant evidence that U.S. drone strikes have injured and killed civilians."
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/25/world/asia/pakistan-us-drone-strikes/