• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Toddler wounds both parents with 1 shot from handgun

The overall death rate for the US in all wars is far less than 1% of the current US population. You seem to have little concern for life

I care for life that why I want to protects people's right by using math to go against your emotional argument.
 
More guns = More death it gets no more complicated than that as you have been shown
No it doesn't. If that were the case Norway would be more violent then the UK, and the Czech Republic more violent then Greece Or Canada more violent then Russia. None of these statements are true.


In fact handguns are legal in nearly every country in Europe other then yours and your country is still the most violent in Europe so go figure
 
Last edited:
According to the CDC. All firearm deaths in the United States was 32,351. Roughly out of a population of 320 million people in the Country. That is equals to .000101097 % of the populations dead from guns. Which means according to math, statistical it is not significant.

FastStats - Injuries

and get rid of those who were banned from owning guns (i.e. the vast majority of murderers) its even smaller
 
The overall death rate for the US in all wars is far less than 1% of the current US population. You seem to have little concern for life

you seem to have little concern for freedom or factual accuracy. White Americans have a lower rate of gun violence despite our "free access" to firearms than say whites in places like the UK
 
More guns = More death it gets no more complicated than that as you have been shown

Except we've shown you that those deaths for the vast majority only affect criminals and gang members....so who cares? And then those in socio-economically depressed areas, and we try to prevent crime and gangs to protect those people.

So you're right. It's not that complicated. The great majority is in no danger from guns. Certainly they are alot safer from guns than they are from their own cars.
 
An nuclear warhead is an inanimate object too so shouild we just let everyone have one of those ?
A nuke is not suitable for militia duty, and is also unusually dangerous, unlike your typical self-defense handgun.
 
More guns = More death it gets no more complicated than that as you have been shown
The whole reason I carry a handgun is so that I can cause a 'gun death' should I need to.

What's your point?
 
No it doesn't. If that were the case Norway would be more violent then the UK,

But in fact Norway has seven times the gun death rate of the UK per 100,000 so whats your point ?

In fact handguns are legal in nearly every country in Europe other then yours and your country is still the most violent in Europe so go figure

Most violent in Europe ? Have you ever visited it ? On the contrary our overall official crime stats are the lowest since 1981 so it looks like all those gun bans have been helping

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/apr/25/uk-crime-falls-official-figures
 
Last edited:
Except we've shown you that those deaths for the vast majority only affect criminals and gang members....so who cares? And then those in socio-economically depressed areas, and we try to prevent crime and gangs to protect those people.

So you're right. It's not that complicated. The great majority is in no danger from guns. Certainly they are alot safer from guns than they are from their own cars.

I've answered this already ..... twice ! :yawn:
 
you seem to have little concern for freedom or factual accuracy. White Americans have a lower rate of gun violence despite our "free access" to firearms than say whites in places like the UK

I call BS on that claim :roll:
 
Toddler wounds both parents with 1 shot from handgun

Toddler was a good shot, too bad the parents were stupid enough to leave wife's purse with a loaded gun in it for the kid to reach.

More irresponsibility from gun owners.

Authorities have taken their child away from them for the time being, but maybe too late.

Thankfully he shot his parents rather than himself or his little sister.
 
The whole reason I carry a handgun is so that I can cause a 'gun death' should I need to.

What's your point?

The point is your lethal response is your first response rather than the last on far too many occassions as is borne out by your stats :(
 
Thankfully he shot his parents rather than himself or his little sister.

It could just as easily been so, as happens many times every day over there

Who cares as long as the guns are protected. Thats all that matters to most respondents here it seems
 
But in fact Norway has seven times the gun death rate of the UK per 100,000 so whats your point ?



Most violent in Europe ? Have you ever visited it ? On the contrary our overall official crime stats are the lowest since 1981 so it looks like all those gun bans have been helping

Crime at lowest level for 30 years | UK news | The Guardian
So what? Is someone killed it with a firearm morally superior to someone killed by another means?

You'd rather have 50 murders committed without a gun, then 10 committed with one?
 
So what? Is someone killed it with a firearm morally superior to someone killed by another means?

Nothing to do with morality just statistics. You are over 40 times more likely to be shot in the US than the UK and as a consequence 5 times more likely to be murdered overall given that three quarters of your murders involve firearms

You'd rather have 50 murders committed without a gun, then 10 committed with one?

No I'd rather make murder more difficult to commit in the first place. Guns make murder too easy
 
The point is your lethal response is your first response rather than the last on far too many occassions as is borne out by your stats :(
Lethal force is my last response. Please do not speak on things you know nothing about.
 
Lethal force is my last response. Please do not speak on things you know nothing about.

That point was not supposed to be addressed to you personally, but I'm sure you knew that
 
Last edited:
Then you have to oppose gun control since gun control makes crime worse.

The worst crime on the books is surely murder. Your murder rates are by far the highest in the developed world because of mass casual access to firearms which are used in three quarters of them. Since we introduced comprehensive gun controls over recent decades our already low gun crime has significantly diminished and our criminal fraternity now find it far more difficult and expensive to acquire them.
 
That point was not supposed to be addressed to you personally
I have to wonder how Europeans claim to have any ground to question the American education system when someone like yourself continually 'misspeaks'. Maybe Europeans shoot first and ask questions later, but here in America we shoot only when we have no other option. Having a gun is about keeping that last resort on the table. About 1/3rd of the time, simply displaying the gun stops the attack cold.
 
have to wonder how Europeans claim to have any ground to question the American education system when someone like yourself continually 'misspeaks'.

This is playing to the gallery of course. I'm pretty sure you really knew what I meant.

Maybe Europeans shoot first and ask questions later, but here in America we shoot only when we have no other option.

Actually we tend to not shoot at all. We live longer that way

Having a gun is about keeping that last resort on the table. About 1/3rd of the time, simply displaying the gun stops the attack cold

But if your society is allegedly so much more law abiding then this kind of overkill would not be necessary. Judging by your statistics that 'last resort' seems to be arrived at rather too often
 
The worst crime on the books is surely murder.
"Worst" is a moral judgment, an opinion. I personally believe child sex offences are worse than murder.

Your murder rates are by far the highest in the developed world because of mass casual access to firearms which are used in three quarters of them.
I look forward to checking your link to the data you've already read which leads you to that assumption.

Since we introduced comprehensive gun controls over recent decades our already low gun crime has significantly diminished and our criminal fraternity now find it far more difficult and expensive to acquire them.
Murder and homicide rates before and after gun bans - Crime Prevention Research Center

What your government did to fool you is to record the data in a different way. Please take some time to educate yourself on the topic before posting further.
 
Last edited:
This is playing to the gallery of course. I'm pretty sure you really knew what I meant.
That honestly sounded like you were accusing me of a crime, something this forum would ban you for if you confirmed you were making a murder accusation.
 
"Worst" is a moral judgment, an opinion.

Eh ?

I look forward to checking your link to the data you've already read which leads you to that assumption.

Already posted on this thread

url=http://crimepreventionresearchcenter.org/2013/12/murder-and-homicide-rates-before-and-after-gun-bans/]Murder and homicide rates before and after gun bans - Crime Prevention Research Center[/url

Gun crime in the UK is at a 20 year low and continues to fall

Vandalism and gun crime fall to 20-year low | Positive News

This is mirrored by a record low across the board for most crimes in the UK

Crime at lowest level for 30 years | UK news | The Guardian
 
Back
Top Bottom