- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 106,823
- Reaction score
- 98,852
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You can't deny your own message. Sorry, but the time limit for you to delete it has passed.
I suggest you try to read gooder.
You can't deny your own message. Sorry, but the time limit for you to delete it has passed.
The fact that you are so concerned over this stuff is evidence that you're paranoid. As for me getting a shot, well, good luck with that.
I suggest you try to read gooder.
Which of your issues of Playboy was that "model" in? I'm unaware of any Playboy model having anything to do with this topic.
Are you an anti-vaxxer trying to disassociate himself with one of the most prominent spokespeople of that movement being a playboy model?
I don't know of any of the playboy models or really anything about the ant-vaxxer movement, so I have no idea who you are talking about as well.
Well seeing as you've been participating in this discussion for a number of pages now maybe it would behoove you to google up on the antivaccination movement, what it's all about and who some of the prominent people endorsing it are.
I swear these greater good arguments remind me of people in a cult. It's a like a chant or something..
The greater good...the greater good....the greater good...
Well seeing as you've been participating in this discussion for a number of pages now maybe it would behoove you to google up on the antivaccination movement, what it's all about and who some of the prominent people endorsing it are.
Well seeing as I haven't shown any interest in the movement that seems kind of like a waste of time. Why don't you just provide the name of the playboy model you're talking about?
I swear these greater good arguments remind me of people in a cult. It's a like a chant or something..
The greater good...the greater good....the greater good...
You having found some "Playboy model" saying something negative about vaccinations is exactly nothing.
I've read a great deal on the topic but, unlike you, never a Playboy or the opinion of a Playboy model. Obviously you considered her one of your scientific opinions to add into your decision process. I haven't. What does that say about the difference between us as to how we form our opinions?
Hasn't that been the justification for every genocide? Stalin murdering 10% of the population was the greater good for 90%? That it was a greater good for all remaining Germans to kill Jews, the disabled and homosexuals?
One person who has recommended some vaccinations and urged NOT getting others?
Our family doctor. Been in practice nearly 4 decades having recently retired from being a lead doctor at the hospital.
An insulting cartoon face of doctors wasn't in that picture earlier in this thread.
You joined this discussion on page three and it's page 21 now, so if you don't know what the antivaccination movement is then you've simply had no interest in learning. I won't waste my time on someone who's made the conscious decision to remain willfully ignorant on the topic.
Well I don't really care about some group that liberals are apparently up in arms about. It's more than likely some irrelevant group that is just their annoyance of the week.
Since some children are allergic to certain vaccinations and vaccinations for some kids with immune system disorders would die, tell us exactly how many children you want CPS to murder for your fanatical belief in vaccinations and profit for drug companies from every child? 1,000? 10,000? 100,000?
Would at least then have CPS pay for the funerals?
Vaccines do not cause autism. Period. There is absolutely no evidence linking the two.
The entire idea comes from a single study which was proven to be fraud. The "scientist" was trying to scare people off the MMR vaccine so he could sell more doses of a vaccine he had a patent on. So he fabricated data and suggested that the "mercury" in the vaccine caused autism.
1) It's not mercury. It's thimerosol.
2) The data was fabricated, there's no correlation with autism
3) We don't even use it anymore
Which is objectively better than being immune to zero strains of a virus.
Also objectively better to not being vaccinated.
For some reason, you seem to be going off some sort of standard of perfection. Vaccines aren't perfect. Nothing is.
Sometimes, you really are better off not wearing a seat belt. That doesn't mean not wearing a seat belt is a good decision.
Um, no. They hadn't figured out vaccinations. Nowhere near a large enough portion of the population was immune.
This is America. We don't do "For the Greater Good". What are you some liberal who wants to take aways guns or somethin'?
I don't care if people get vaccinated or not.
.....
Well if the vast majority of people get vaccinated like you say - only the ones who don't get vaccinated have to worry. Isn't it up to them if they want to take that risk or not... or is should it be forced upon them for the "common good"?
....
Then what about the non-understanding of what causes SIDS is opinionated? ...