• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'We will cut off your head in the White House': ISIS threatens to behead Obama...

Breaking your will is part of their plan.

All the more reason never to given in to their demands, never to give them any money, and never to agree to a prisoner exchange other than a one on one basis, if at all. To do so would weaken the US position and make the US look weak in their eyes, only emboldening the Militant Islamic Fundamentalists further.

Oh wait. Oops.
 
All the more reason never to given in to their demands, never to give them any money, and never to agree to a prisoner exchange other than a one on one basis, if at all. To do so would weaken the US position and make the US look weak in their eyes, only emboldening the Militant Islamic Fundamentalists further.

Oh wait. Oops.

They are making a movie about that...
saving-private-bergdahl.jpg
 
We don't know who their sympathizers are, if some of them may have infiltrated those who are near POTUS and are responsible for his safety. It seems all that brown nosing Muslims hasn't changed the evil intent of some of those who kill in the name of Islam. So I am not sure why we don't identify these creatures for what they are. Fact is, we are much too gullible and complacent. We worry about the Kardashians and the latest Iphones and what Obama wanted to be when he grew up. We worry about hurting feelings and driving a few miles to many.

To the person who thinks Nazis were civil in comparison to ISIL...I really hope that was only a sick joke.
 
I think you read it backwards. This video isn't of Obama vowing to cut their heads off. This video is actually ISIS vowing to take the white house.

Obama's support for terrorists is irrelevant to this video. If he in fact does. I hope that helped clear up your confusion.

I understood it. Why would terrorists want to behead their most powerful supporter?
 
...To the person who thinks Nazis were civil in comparison to ISIL...I really hope that was only a sick joke.

The Nazis were just more efficient and cleaner. Even Germans living near concentration camps claimed they didn't know that they were slaughtering thousands of people inside. Now that's clean.

(irony alert)
 
I meant it as a quality that made them more dangerous.

The whole "The Nazis were at least civilized and had class for the most part" threw me off. I dont consider lethal injections of the sick, beheadings/gassing of pesky political dissidents and jews etc, to be classy either.
 
Yes but ISIS is now a de facto state. They are a nation, so to speak. Its worrisome to think what a few more years of getting established, and funded would do-NBC warfare, etc are a real possibility. And an international playground for bad actors.

But their "members" are not restricted to that state, they can and do live all over the place, willing and able to die for Islam, any time the state, or any Imam who claims to speak for the religion, suggests they do so. Blowing ISIS to atoms doesn't affect the worldwide danger.
 
We don't know who their sympathizers are, if some of them may have infiltrated those who are near POTUS and are responsible for his safety. It seems all that brown nosing Muslims hasn't changed the evil intent of some of those who kill in the name of Islam. So I am not sure why we don't identify these creatures for what they are.

I agree. So why is it that this administration can't call them what they are? Islamic terrorists? Or perhaps Militant Islamic Fundamentalists (which I think is the most accurate, BTW).

Al Jazeera English bans words: 'Terrorist,' 'Islamist,' 'jihad' off-limits to news employees - Washington Times

Part of that inability to use certain words is a means to control the impression that people get when those words are used; a means to control the conversation, and how people perceive these Militant Islamic Fundamentalists as acceptable people somehow. You know. Propaganda and manipulation of the electorate? Been practices since the dawn of time.

Fact is, we are much too gullible and complacent. We worry about the Kardashians and the latest Iphones and what Obama wanted to be when he grew up. We worry about hurting feelings and driving a few miles to many.

If also find it amazing the number of people that are oblivious to the goings on in the wider world; how they isolate themselves in their tiny social media world all wrapped up with what the Celebutards from Hollyweird are up to next.

It's amazing that this country still functions, such as it has and is, with what seems to be the vast majority of the electorate slowly turning themselves in to stupid as stumps sheeple, only to be led by the merest of tugs on the nose ring that their favored political party had inserted without their knowing.

To the person who thinks Nazis were civil in comparison to ISIL...I really hope that was only a sick joke.

Between the two, my bet would be on the Nazis, but that's really a case of choosing the lesser of two evils.
 
Say what?

Yea, it's why they were a whole lot more dangerous... tied insanity with ruthless precision, nationalism, strategy, and technology. They were a lot more convincing than the ISIS to the people of those times, it's why they got national power and converted an entire country to their side. Their fooled-sophistication was a big factor in their success.... ISIS is barbaric, literally people coming from 1200AD mindsets.
 
The whole "The Nazis were at least civilized and had class for the most part" threw me off. I dont consider lethal injections of the sick, beheadings/gassing of pesky political dissidents and jews etc, to be classy either.

Their sophistication was a big factor in their success, even though it was just a perceived one.... ISIS is barbaric, literally people coming from 1200AD mindsets.
 
The whole "The Nazis were at least civilized and had class for the most part" threw me off. I dont consider lethal injections of the sick, beheadings/gassing of pesky political dissidents and jews etc, to be classy either.

We agree on something.
 
But their "members" are not restricted to that state, they can and do live all over the place, willing and able to die for Islam, any time the state, or any Imam who claims to speak for the religion, suggests they do so. Blowing ISIS to atoms doesn't affect the worldwide danger.

Thats true, but Im saying having their own territory as well makes them more dangerous.
 
Yea, it's why they were a whole lot more dangerous... tied insanity with ruthless precision, nationalism, strategy, and technology. They were a lot more convincing than the ISIS to the people of those times, it's why they got national power and converted an entire country to their side. Their fooled-sophistication was a big factor in their success.... ISIS is barbaric, literally people coming from 1200AD mindsets.

Again, say what. I suggest you interview people that were alive during Hitlers rise to power and fall and see what they actually think.
 
Thats true, but Im saying having their own territory as well makes them more dangerous.

It just makes them an easier target should any nation on the planet grow a pair and get serious about taking out their central hub.
 
It just makes them an easier target should any nation on the planet grow a pair and get serious about taking out their central hub.

To an extent, but its still low intensity and asymmetrical. They will still hide behind civilians and use the same tactics they have elsewhere up to this point. They aren't bound by borders either.
 
All the more reason never to given in to their demands, never to give them any money, and never to agree to a prisoner exchange other than a one on one basis, if at all. To do so would weaken the US position and make the US look weak in their eyes, only emboldening the Militant Islamic Fundamentalists further.

Oh wait. Oops.

They only have 1 goal--to drive the US out of the middle east and the protection of Israel. Doesn't matter to them how many years it takes or how many heads get lopped off. It is that the US has a position that is the issue, not what the position is.
 
To an extent, but its still low intensity and asymmetrical. They will still hide behind civilians and use the same tactics they have elsewhere up to this point. They aren't bound by borders either.

Which is exactly my point. If we go in and nuke the home of IS, it doesn't get rid of IS, it doesn't solve the problem, they just come at us from any of a thousand other places. If we went in and nuked Germany, the Nazis would stop fighting because they have an attachment to that piece of land. IS doesn't. They have an attachment to an ideology. It doesn't matter to them where they live.
 
They only have 1 goal--to drive the US out of the middle east and the protection of Israel. Doesn't matter to them how many years it takes or how many heads get lopped off. It is that the US has a position that is the issue, not what the position is.

Then why did they say they were going to destroy Rome?
 
They only have 1 goal--to drive the US out of the middle east and the protection of Israel. Doesn't matter to them how many years it takes or how many heads get lopped off. It is that the US has a position that is the issue, not what the position is.

What are you talking about? They want a worldwide caliphate. They have said as much.
 
Then why did they say they were going to destroy Rome?

Because they want the west to be hostile toward Muslims who leave so they return to the borg collective. It is all psychological warfare and they are winning.
 
Back
Top Bottom