• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'We will cut off your head in the White House': ISIS threatens to behead Obama...

It is 'justice' of convenience.

Obama did NOT want there to be terrorists in Libya, so instead of delivering the alleged might of the US military to the Assassins of Americans, he lamely promised an FBI investigation......and no one paused to think of the implications.

"Achmed, is it true Allah has blessed you with the blood of American diplomats and you live free?! I bet we all can, let's behead some children now."

Obama does not want there to be an "illegals" problem, but like eliminating terrorists, he changes the vocabulary..."un documenteds" don't have to be arested and shipped back.

Problem solved Obama style.

Not even the scum dwelling socialists in Canada are that dishonest. They may mess with the definition of "homeless" and such, but not enforcing laws is ....

wait...the NDP here learns from you guys.....

This is why leftism is a dated policy of failure-no new ideas (class struggle comrade!) and feeling better about failure.

If the terrorists dont like us-the problem must be us and if we appease theres no longer a problem.

Free healthcare for all-meaning everyone has to buy health insurance under a unilateral mandate.

Low scores in govt run schools? Just lower standards!

Too many poor? Eat the rich!

Essentially, freedom isn't fair so give yours to the left, and they will look after you, in all their beneficence.
 
No, it should be as ugly as hell...

But what I suggest is rather radical...

You attack the money flow. Give the international community the power to seize the assets of banks who allow trade with terrorists groups, sanction every ****ing nation that supports them...take the Bush doctrine to the stratosphere with legal roadblocks etc.

You attack, with military force, anyone selling arms to terrorists....as legal war based combatants.

Then back off the shootin' war, hit 'em where it hurts. The more I think about it there is a parallel between Islamic terrorism and the 1920's and 30's mafia. They could never shoot it out with Al Capone and co., so they went after the money. It was cash then and easy to hide, not so today.


Why hasn't it happened? Why did Bush unveil such a consolidated plan and then simply make war badly?

I can only suspect.

Im all for attacking them any way possible. I'd like to think that fighting them economically would be substantive, but I think its going to take kinetic energy.
 
While it's a given that governments based on Islam (or any religion) are not ideal, jizya was not meant to be a way to oppress non-Muslims. Zakat, the tax that Muslims have to pay but non-Muslims don't, is supposed to be the same amount as jizya at a minimum.

I dont care how it was "meant". Its oppression in practice.
 
'We will cut off your head in the White House': ISIS threatens to behead Obama and turn the U.S. into a 'Muslim province' in new execution video

They just lost their greatest and perhaps only advantage... surprise.
 
This is actually something new for them.

When it was 911 and Al-Qaeda "terrorist" and "Islamic radical" were the rice of the leftist meal, trying to lay blame for the event on Bush. Now, Obama has a peace prize, has apologized to the Arab and Muslim world and interfered in several regime changes; enough that he should be able to claim actual rights to that now embarrassing prize [after AL Gore, Jimmy Carter and Obama it has as much meaning as a blue ribbon in fair with one entrant].

But he cannot justify this claim of success so necessary to his "legacy" now that every other thing he's touched has turned to pillars of salt.

What is interesting is how fast the "stupid voters" pick up on the new monologue, a rather Orwellian shift from "enemies" to some kind of generic threat that cannot use any term suggesting Islam is involved.

It's an amazing dance and proof to me Obama is a sociopath. On the one hand he is saying, in effect, there is no radical Islam while at the same time claiming credit for killing them.

How anyone cannot be a Muslim because they kill other Muslims is not a logic at all...

It's just plain lying

Obama knows exactly what he's doing and has done. He's a wolf in sheeps clothing. And his lefty flock dutifully follow. He knows about the sheep dogs-and he knows that we know.
 
Breaking your will is part of their plan.

He was making fun of Obama's foreign policy if you didn't catch the sarcasm.
 
He was making fun of Obama's foreign policy if you didn't catch the sarcasm.

Breaking people's sense of humor is part of their plan too.
 
I dont care how it was "meant". Its oppression in practice.

If the tax that Muslims have to pay for being Muslims is higher than the tax that non-Muslims have to pay for being non-Muslims, then no, it is not oppression in practice.
 
Pure propaganda and uselessness from ISIS, anyone should be able to see the almost nonexistent odds that ISIS has the capacity or military ability to assassinate the President or turn the US into a Muslim province.



I'm not at all sure about that…

The "Sons of Liberty" were certainly no match for the British Empire and the Viet Cong had no chance against the USA.

That said, though, this threat might become a plank of the GOP Party Platform. Cutting off his head might be a too dramatic statement for the GOP. Maybe another body part(s) and then just figuratively.
 
If the tax that Muslims have to pay for being Muslims is higher than the tax that non-Muslims have to pay for being non-Muslims, then no, it is not oppression in practice.

Ah I see. I guess Islamic societies are actually quite tolerant and free, aren't they? :doh
 
This is why leftism is a dated policy of failure-no new ideas (class struggle comrade!) and feeling better about failure.

If the terrorists dont like us-the problem must be us and if we appease theres no longer a problem.

Free healthcare for all-meaning everyone has to buy health insurance under a unilateral mandate.

Low scores in govt run schools? Just lower standards!

Too many poor? Eat the rich!

Essentially, freedom isn't fair so give yours to the left, and they will look after you, in all their beneficence.



Have a look at Mussolini's Fascism and how Hitler borrowed from that. State mandated monopolies and mandated buying. Same again with "affordable" health care....force people to buy a for-profit service where there are no limits on the profit.

Sorry, but I would take socialism over that.
 
Im all for attacking them any way possible. I'd like to think that fighting them economically would be substantive, but I think its going to take kinetic energy.

I really don't think they've even tried.

I suspect all that oil wealth has a lot of people cowed
 
Seems like it worked on you. Enjoy your day.

I enjoy every day.
I think you misunderstood.
He means this day belongs to you and you alone.
That's really good.....Super Bowl Sunday all for you.:)
Unfortunately, he is wrong.
Today is my birthday, in addition to being SB Sunday.
Therefore, today is actually MY day.
Pretty cool that they're playing the Super Bowl in my honor.
I will allow you to enjoy my day......you don't get any cake, though.
 
If the tax that Muslims have to pay for being Muslims is higher than the tax that non-Muslims have to pay for being non-Muslims, then no, it is not oppression in practice.

Jizya disappeared in the 19th century, and Zekat is a voluntary tax at best today, so when you have ISIS going into villages today imposing Jizya as a kind of blackmail against death, you think that is ok?
 
I think you misunderstood.
He means this day belongs to you and you alone.
That's really good.....Super Bowl Sunday all for you.:)
Unfortunately, he is wrong.
Today is my birthday, in addition to being SB Sunday.
Therefore, today is actually MY day.
Pretty cool that they're playing the Super Bowl in my honor.
I will allow you to enjoy my day......you don't get any cake, though.

Happy Birthday.
 
Ah I see. I guess Islamic societies are actually quite tolerant and free, aren't they? :doh

Definitely not, and as I said, governments should never have religious influence. However, there's no point in levying bogus charges against the Muslim world when there are legitimate instances of oppression and societal faults.
 
Definitely not, and as I said, governments should never have religious influence. However, there's no point in levying bogus charges against the Muslim world when there are legitimate instances of oppression and societal faults.

I suppose islam is lucky to have you here to defend it.
 
Only those who have read the entire Bible and entire Koran could compare and identify...
 
Back
Top Bottom