- Joined
- Oct 17, 2006
- Messages
- 59,337
- Reaction score
- 27,005
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
In light of evidence and links, your reply is nah uh???
It really takes some intellectual dishonesty to call other people's arguments bull**** after his very first defense turned out to be a completely fabricated account of events. I mean, this is a person who didn't know that China had been embargoed for 21 years before the US normalized relations. This is a person who doesn't understand that 11 million new customers would be a good economic incentive to normalize relations. This is a person who believe that the embargo shouldn't be lifted until the regime is gone and believes that others are wrong in calling out hypocrisy because oppressive governments have never really been an issue for the US. When you're dealing with a person that devoid of any knowledge on the country they're discussing, it's just easier to watch the events as they unfold and ignore the silly relics of the Cold War.