• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dems change tune after mocking GOP for ‘drill, baby, drill’

The why did you righties do all those things that you think are so wrong? Are you morons or something?

Aren't you asking a loaded question here. Like, do they still beat their wives? :lamo
 
Surprising no right wingers ever heard of Obamanomics. Well, not really, some still reside in cold, dark, damp places.

Obamanomics

The success of Obamanomics | Al Jazeera America

as opposed to

Reaganomics (/reɪɡəˈnɒmɪks/; a portmanteau of Reagan and economics attributed to Paul Harvey)[1] refers to the economic policies promoted by U.S. President Ronald Reagan during the 1980s. These policies are commonly associated with supply-side economics, referred to as trickle-down economics by political opponents and free market economics by political advocates.
Reaganomics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Do you believe what Al Jazzeera said in this article? Do you understand the national debt?
 
Actually you did--going back to the Harding/Coolidge/Hoover catastrophe.

As repeated by Reagan and Bush-two .

because when we did those things we had no track record to look at, no we do, and we will no longer compromise with bad ideas, and foolish people.
 
Do you believe what Al Jazzeera said in this article? Do you understand the national debt?

Do you believe facts, no matter the source?
Or do you quibble with the link when it doesn't support your thoughts, casting aspersions on it because it's name is Arab ?
 
Do you believe what Al Jazzeera said in this article? Do you understand the national debt?

Do you believe that trickle down works? when the wealthy become even wealthier. Hoard money and assets and not create jobs after being given tax cuts as incentives to create jobs?

The national debt? when did conservatives suddenly become obsessed with deficits and national debt?
wait, don't answer that, I already know...

First inauguration of Barack Obama - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
GOP messengers now getting the message, the booming economy can't be denied.
So their lie machine does a 180, taking credit for Obamanomics .

I'll be more than glad to give Obama credit for lower gas and oil prices... if you can explain what he done to affect those changes.
 
Do you believe that trickle down works? when the wealthy become even wealthier. Hoard money and assets and not create jobs after being given tax cuts as incentives to create jobs?
In fact the difference between the rich and poor has grown, the middle is shrinking and real wages have gone down since Obama gained the Presidency.

The national debt? when did conservatives suddenly become obsessed with deficits and national debt?
Obsessed? You feel the national debt isn't a concern? Do you even know how many trillions of dollars BHO has managed to rack up in six years?
wait, don't answer that, I already know...
No, I don't think you do.
 
Actually you did--going back to the Harding/Coolidge/Hoover catastrophe.

As repeated by Reagan and Bush-two .

Yeah the depression was caused because of interest rates and credit, they had very little to do with that.

Also FDR was responsible for making the Depression worse and last longer to increase political power.

The Free Market | Mises Institute

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409

http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/policy-report/2003/7/powell.pdf

ABC Finds FDR Partly to Blame for 10-Year Great Depression

Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian: How Government Prolonged the Depression - WSJ
 
What is Obamanomics?

it's a made up term to fool people into thinking Obama has an economic system of his own.

it generally only fools the most partisan among us.. with one side hating it, the other side loving it...everyone else is thinking " umm, there's nothing substantially different from the last guy"
 
These guys will find any reason-or none at all to hate on what they dont want to be true.

Quite intellectually lazy. Why would you accept the leftist canon and the myths that conceal reality?



"The modern liberal, there’s something about his ideology that leads him to invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right, the lesser over the better, the ugly over the beautiful, the profane over the profound, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success."

"It’s an act of bigotry to be an objective reporter." Now, I will admit, I find that brilliant. I wish I had come up with it. It explains a lot about trying to understand the Drive-By Media today. Being objective is bigoted. Why do you think that is? Well, if you're objective it means you are unfeeling toward victims. You are ignoring the pain. If you don't see the pain, if you don't see the failure, if you don't see the suffering and champion it, then you're worthless, you're a bigot yourself.

Is that not true? It is. Every word of it's true. "The modern liberal, there’s something about his ideology that leads him to invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right, the lesser over the better, the ugly over the beautiful, the profane over the profound, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success."

If no religion, no culture, no person, if no behavior, if no form of governance -- if nothing is better than anything else, then success is unjust." And there it is. "If no religion, no culture, no person, if no behavior, if no form of governance -- if nothing is better than anything else, then success is unjust. Why should a person, a nation, a government, religion succeed, if it’s not better than any other? So that liberalism says 'everything is equally good, man, coexist -- doesn’t make everything meet in the middle. It makes the better, bad.


The modern liberal, there’s something about his ideology that leads him to invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right, the lesser over the better, the ugly over the beautiful, the profane over the profound, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success, and more over the triumph of all that is evil and wrong over all that which is good, just, and righteous..

That sums up what leftist are, what they believe, and they always do/create..
 
"The modern liberal, there’s something about his ideology that leads him to invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right, the lesser over the better, the ugly over the beautiful, the profane over the profound, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success."

"It’s an act of bigotry to be an objective reporter." Now, I will admit, I find that brilliant. I wish I had come up with it. It explains a lot about trying to understand the Drive-By Media today. Being objective is bigoted. Why do you think that is? Well, if you're objective it means you are unfeeling toward victims. You are ignoring the pain. If you don't see the pain, if you don't see the failure, if you don't see the suffering and champion it, then you're worthless, you're a bigot yourself.

Is that not true? It is. Every word of it's true. "The modern liberal, there’s something about his ideology that leads him to invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right, the lesser over the better, the ugly over the beautiful, the profane over the profound, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success."

If no religion, no culture, no person, if no behavior, if no form of governance -- if nothing is better than anything else, then success is unjust." And there it is. "If no religion, no culture, no person, if no behavior, if no form of governance -- if nothing is better than anything else, then success is unjust. Why should a person, a nation, a government, religion succeed, if it’s not better than any other? So that liberalism says 'everything is equally good, man, coexist -- doesn’t make everything meet in the middle. It makes the better, bad.


The modern liberal, there’s something about his ideology that leads him to invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right, the lesser over the better, the ugly over the beautiful, the profane over the profound, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success, and more over the triumph of all that is evil and wrong over all that which is good, just, and righteous..

That sums up what leftist are, what they believe, and they always do/create..

Uh huh. :roll:
 
"The modern liberal, there’s something about his ideology that leads him to invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right, the lesser over the better, the ugly over the beautiful, the profane over the profound, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success."

"It’s an act of bigotry to be an objective reporter." Now, I will admit, I find that brilliant. I wish I had come up with it. It explains a lot about trying to understand the Drive-By Media today. Being objective is bigoted. Why do you think that is? Well, if you're objective it means you are unfeeling toward victims. You are ignoring the pain. If you don't see the pain, if you don't see the failure, if you don't see the suffering and champion it, then you're worthless, you're a bigot yourself.

Is that not true? It is. Every word of it's true. "The modern liberal, there’s something about his ideology that leads him to invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right, the lesser over the better, the ugly over the beautiful, the profane over the profound, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success."

If no religion, no culture, no person, if no behavior, if no form of governance -- if nothing is better than anything else, then success is unjust." And there it is. "If no religion, no culture, no person, if no behavior, if no form of governance -- if nothing is better than anything else, then success is unjust. Why should a person, a nation, a government, religion succeed, if it’s not better than any other? So that liberalism says 'everything is equally good, man, coexist -- doesn’t make everything meet in the middle. It makes the better, bad.


The modern liberal, there’s something about his ideology that leads him to invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right, the lesser over the better, the ugly over the beautiful, the profane over the profound, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success, and more over the triumph of all that is evil and wrong over all that which is good, just, and righteous..

That sums up what leftist are, what they believe, and they always do/create..

I think my sig reflects that as well-if you start from flawed assumptions no wonder you'd always be mad. A very insightful post.
 
No response, I am shocked.

There's nothing to respond to.

By the way, it's generally considered good form to cite one's source when copy-pasting hyperpartisan "the other side sux" drivel.
 
There's nothing to respond to.

By the way, it's generally considered good form to cite one's source when copy-pasting hyperpartisan "the other side sux" drivel.

I did not know the truth was "hyperpartisan".
 
Back
Top Bottom