- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 119,584
- Reaction score
- 75,509
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
It is unilateral when one person is authorized to kill instead of granting the person a trial by jury of peers. If they're an authorized government official doing this it is even more immoral IMO. If a person deserves justice, it should be determined through the justice system.
So you consider it more "moral" to allow crime and killing of police and innocent people...not allowing them to defend themselves...and then attempting to bring the perpetrator to "justice" later?
If so, please refer back to my words in parentheses in my previous post, and also my statement that I'm very glad few, if any, other Americans agree with you.