Or waiting on the ambulance.
Society has evolved past communism.
If you're going to condemn a behavior it's best if you not perform that behavior as you condemn it.
Sigh. Our posts crossed before I put you on ignore. Now I have, so this is the last comment. When you say I'm whining, you are calling me a whiner. You are not saying "I disagree with your complaint", you are just trying to offend me. Yes, I can see what a personal attack is. Some are explicit, some are indirect. Indirect as yours was (not really, but let's assume it was, for the sake of the argument) it was still a personal attack. Now, I did introduce new information, like another poster mentioned (that he didn't know about the gun pictures). I don't expect others to spoon-feed me information; I specifically gave examples of people in the are in Ukraine with access to info sooner and often better than the media, so I was inquiring/hoping for someone from the Ferguson/Berkeley area who would have fresh info. Now, since I'm NOT in Ukraine, or Ferguson/Berkeley, I did NOT have fresh information (I'm not planning to travel there to go get it). And you mentioned the gun in and out as if I was taking any sides in this issue - I was merely presenting possibilities. When you say stuff like "Apparently now you're saying the cop wasn't justified in shooting because he didn't wait for the teen to fire first" you grossly misunderstand what I was saying. I never said that. I just said in two opposite hypotheses, that if we *were* to support hypothesis B, it might be difficult to believe that the cop fired several shots and the teen who had the gun supposedly pointed at him didn't fire any (Hyp. B would be a cover-up and a planted gun - and hey, the police might have a gun with the serial number filed off, just for this purpose of planting it). Now, I did ALSO advance hypothesis A, in which there is no cover-up and the cop is entirely justified. I didn't support either hypothesis. So, NO, you didn't understand the intention, scope, or content of my post, and went immediately into an uppity attitude, with barely disguised personal attacks. Now, good-bye for good, like I said, other than for defending myself when attacked or misrepresented (which I did after each of the four posts where you attacked me or misrepresented me), I have ZERO interest in reading you, and have read you for the last time (would have missed your fourth misguided post if you hadn't replied before I was finished composing my third one).
The conversation is about finding public information.
What makes you think the information is not available to investigators, to then insist it should be?
Immediate means immediate, not 72 hours later. You wanted the police dash-cam released to the public right then and there before the cop even had a chance to talk with the union rep and prepare a legal defense. I can only assume you desire a witch hunt.
Ok this just happened so what makes you think it's not being thoroughly documented?
All the Ferguson protesters are "the most radical". The very protest itself is based on a life-long bully being killed while trying to kill a cop. Only the most radical racists participate in a Ferguson protest to begin with. They will not see the facts, they will only see a cop shooting a black teen.
See? You want the dash-cams made available to the public right now, this very post.
Why should I care about that? Post what you want, you aren't accountable to me.
You entered this debate whining about no one spoon-feeding you new information. You have a computer, use Google for yourself.
Be sure that I'm not ignoring you and will continue to reply to your posts as I see fit
So you have put me on ignore yet are still responding to my posts. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of putting someone on ignore? It also shows that you want to respond to my posts, which should give you pause to consider your decision....this is a debate site, after all.
OMG please stop whining :doh
Was that me? Because I don't know about the gun pictures you mentioned either. I thought I asked about that. I can re-read the thread for a 3rd time to be sure but I don't think any have been posted.
That's called speculation and it's my experience that nothing causes more drama on this website than speculation. People here like facts, evidence, and expect our speculation to be attacked when we present it....that is in fact why we present it, why we join a debate site in the first place.
The ignore feature is your's to use as you see fit. I myself am not putting you on ignore and will continue to respond to your posts as I see fit.
