- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,075
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I think Agent J does. He was the one posting evidence he thinks shows there was foul play and posted the article by the LA Times that brings up lynching. I think Danarhea thinks it was since he tried to link it to Emit Till. And I think iliveonramen believes that it was because he was arguing that hanging a person is uncommon except in a "very specific circumstance" (read: lynching)
as usual your post thinks wrong about me
I DO think this is shady
I DO think theres evidence that suggest foul play
I DO think there is enough to warrant a deeper outside investigation
but i clearly said i dont know what happened and i wasnt there
my conversations about "lynchings" were to two posters that didn't know what they were. 1 falsely claimed that lynching had to involve race, thats wrong. The other falsely claimed that a lynching had to be based on a LEGAL crime, that was also wrong.
BUT due to the lengthy time it took for me, the dictionary and other posters to get them to understand this fact so I could understand how you made your mistake, i could have easily made it myself.