• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. household net worth falls for first time since 2011

DA60

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
16,386
Reaction score
7,793
Location
Where I am now
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
'The net worth of U.S. households fell in the third quarter for the first time in three years, hit by a fall in the value of their stock holdings and rising debts, giving mixed signals on the outlook for consumer spending.

The decline was modest, pushing the vast total wealth of American families down just $140 billion to $81.35 trillion, a report by the Federal Reserve showed on Thursday.

But it breaks a long uninterrupted chain of gains that many economists say have gradually made U.S. consumers more willing to spend their cash. Many economists think consumers spend a few cents out of every dollar that their net worth increases.

The last time net worth declined was in the third quarter of 2011.'

U.S. household net worth falls for first time since 2011


Take QE away...
 
20141211_networth.jpg
 
The way I read that chart is that the increases are relative to the low in 2008. Then more loss below the 2008 baseline in 2009 and then a small increase over the 2009 bottom and each following relative to that. In short, I don't think the picture/graph, and I like graphs, depicts an accurate history. I could be wrong.
 
The way I read that chart is that the increases are relative to the low in 2008. Then more loss below the 2008 baseline in 2009 and then a small increase over the 2009 bottom and each following relative to that. In short, I don't think the picture/graph, and I like graphs, depicts an accurate history. I could be wrong.

I agree that the graph doesn't do a good job. It's hard for me to see what progress if any, has been made to recoup the losses that occurred in 08 and 09. Have we finally caught up where we were before this drop again? How much further do we have to go until we're there? Or maybe we have fully healed since the "Great Recession" and if so, maybe this dip doesn't seem as bad.

Context here is what this graph is missing.
 
The way I read that chart is that the increases are relative to the low in 2008. Then more loss below the 2008 baseline in 2009 and then a small increase over the 2009 bottom and each following relative to that. In short, I don't think the picture/graph, and I like graphs, depicts an accurate history. I could be wrong.

I dunno...maybe you are right.

But I just post 'em, I don't make 'em.

Here is the source:

After 11 Quarters In A Row, US Households See Net Worth Tumble $141 Billion In Q3 | Zero Hedge
 
Back
Top Bottom